Seeking Alpha
  • jdub2788
    before anyone says AAPL top, didnt get beyond $605...let me do it for you. I don't think that's not a top IMO. but who knows.
    3/20/12
    Reply (19)
    • jdub2788: im as clueless as anyone else. my GLD has done zero, my miners are getting skull eff'd, my sqqq is a debacle. what a week and its only tues
      3/20/12
    • Bob de'Long: How's your condo in Acapulco?
      3/20/12
    • TonyNed: Wait, did you use a double negative on purpose or was that just poor grammar?
      3/20/12
    • Hillbilly Stock Star: My big guess is GLD gets "monkeyed " to $1500 ish imo.
      3/20/12
    • bdubya13: how about your Baltimore investment property?
      3/20/12
    • bigfoot: Look at $APPL chart for 1999-2000. That was a bubble that burst, and it could happen again.
      3/20/12
    • Bret Kenwell: yeah but AAPL in 2000 and AAPL in 2012 is a whole different beast.
      3/20/12
    • bigfoot: Only if AAPL can keep innovating, and with Jobs gone, that's far from certain.
      3/20/12
    • Bret Kenwell: yeah but they are just at the beginning of pushing out some huge products, still early with the iPhone 4s, the whole iPad collection, while
      3/20/12
    • Bret Kenwell: I agree that AAPL is more than due for a pullback, I still think they have a substantial amount of time left on top as the tech titan
      3/20/12
    • bigfoot: I'm not saying AAPL can't stay a $600 stock, though I predict they'll split it in the next year or two, but bubbles usually burst.
      3/20/12
    • Bret Kenwell: well in the end it is inevitable. it sounds as though you mean longer term, I originally had the impression you meant short term. my bad
      3/20/12
    • JayWright: Any company that sells a "fad" product is subject to bubble burst more than a company that provides consumer "staples".
      3/20/12
    • JayWright: Just a matter of when.
      3/20/12
    • bigfoot: BTW, the low for the day on AAPL has been revised to 582 from 570.
      3/20/12
    • Docneuro411: Bigfoot, I saw that today too, I was wondering about that, I didn't think I saw any prints close to 570 coming across, but I guess it only
      3/20/12
    • Docneuro411: Takes a nanosecond to get that low and come back. I wonder if it was a trade that got nullified?
      3/20/12
    • Ohdz: lol tony that double negative threw me off too
      3/21/12
    • jdub2788: interpret how you want the double negative....the mystery is what kills everyone! :)
      3/21/12