Too Late to the Oil Party? Consider an Alternative (Part II) [View article]
I hear a lot of people say that nuclear is more viable than wind or solar, but I haven't seen any data to back it up. Anyone seen a study that does a side-by-side comparison of costs of a nuke facility(construction, fuel, waste storage, etc) vs. a wind farm, and a comparison of the amount of MWh each produces over its expected lifespan? My wildly aimed guess would be that an equivalent wind farm is more expensive up front but that the advantages of not needing fuel and not having waste to deal with would tend to even out the costs. I just don't know how close it comes to parity.
CT, when all the ice melts in Antarctica, it will still be a continent, because there is land under there. Unlike the Arctic, which is why we call the Arctic an Ocean, and Antarctica a Continent. But I take your point, though.
Too Late to the Oil Party? Consider an Alternative (Part II) [View article]
The T. Boone Pickens Approach [View article]
What We Can Do To Reverse the Oil Crisis [View article]