Loading...
Symbols:
Get Seeking Alpha Free Stock Alerts by Email!
Get Free Stock Alerts by Email!
Transcripts
- Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc. F3Q08 (Quarter End 09/05/08) Earnings Call Transcript
- General Electric Company Q3 2008 Earnings Call Transcript
- DragonWave Inc. F2Q09 (Qtr End 08/31/08) Earnings Call Transcript
- Emmis Communications Corporation F2Q09 (Qtr End 08/31/08) Earnings Call Transcript
- Audiovox Corporation F2Q09 (Qtr End 08/31/08) Earnings Call Transcript
- Robbins & Myers, Inc. F4Q08 (Qtr End 08/31/08) Earnings Call Transcript
- Total System Services, Inc. Q3 2008 Earnings Call Transcript
- Tortoise Capital Resources F3Q08 (Qtr End 08/31/2008) Earnings Call Transcript
- Intraware, Inc. F2Q09 (Qtr End 08/31/08) Earnings Call Transcript
- LTX-Credence Corporation Business Update Call Transcript
-
Editor's Picks
-
Most Popular
- PIC: Market Rewards Insurers That Avoided Risk
- Venture Debt Firms: Crunch Time and Opportunity
- Exxon Mobil Appears at Lower End of Valuation Range
- Crocodile Tears and the LIBOR-OIS Spread
- Geopolitics, Politics, and the Financial Crisis
- Apocalypse Dow: The Search for Scapegoats
- Full list of Editor's Picks »
- Cramer Should Be Suspended »
- This Isn't a Bottom, It's a Disturbance in The Force »
- Bulls Take a Stand - Cramer's Stop Trading! (10/10/08) »
- Where We Go from Here: Best and Worst Cases »
- Sirius Shares Priced Like Stamps »
- Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News »
- Prefer a Yield - Cramer's Lightning Round (10/10/08) »
- 5 Reasons Stocks Will Keep Falling »
- 60% of Google Employee Stock Options Are Drowning »
- Back Room Deal? - Cramer's Mad Money (10/10/08) »
- Midstream MLPs Crashing, Present Opportunity »
Trading Center
Hedge Fund Jobs
Job Seekers: Search jobs by category, get job alerts by email or live feed, apply online See full list of jobs »
Employers: See all recruitment options, get applications online or by email Post a job »
Lilguy
47 Comments
Nouriel Roubini Predicts (Surprise!) a Long Recession
I just can't figure out which ones are which, but Roubini has come as close to any in recent times in accurately assessing economic trends. I'd pick him if I only had one choice.
Why Is Everybody Selling as Buffett Is Loading Up?
This capital enables him to get extremely good deals--at the front of the line in terms of preferred shares, earning interest at rates unheard of for the "common man," and having an option to buy stocks below at or below current market prices when the long-term expectation (& Warren's only concern) is that they will go up.
About the only way I can get that deal is to invest in BRK!
Don't Get Sanguine About This Bill
The proposed legislation does not focus on the right problem. The critical underlying problem in our economy is the growing number of foreclosures and associated decline in the US real estate market. This bill will not address the core problem in any meaningful way.
The proposed legislation is inadequate to the task it is intended to tackle. Even if all the $700 billion were made available as credit by the receiving banks, it would be insufficient to bail them out of the multi-trillion dollar liquidity shortfall they face. the Treasury and Federal Reserve have already extended over a trillion dollars in direct aid or guarantees to Wall Street—and credit conditions have worsened.
The proposed legislation will not result in significantly expanded credit available from Wall Street to Main Street. Because of their huge leverage—20-30 times their capital—the banks will need virtually every cent to shore up their capital reserves. The half-trillion dollars already extended to Wall Street has accomplished nothing in easing credit conditions.
The proposed legislation rewards the outrageously poor, if not outright corrupt, financial management of the banking industry. Banks that knowingly failed to be diligent about risk management and some that participated in fraud will be bailed out. Indeed, the mismanagement of major banks is systemic and has metastasized the illness in the housing industry into a global financial cancer. It needs to be cauterized, not subsidized.
The proposed legislation will ultimately leave the US taxpayer with hundreds of billions of dollars in losses added to the national debt and our taxes. To make any sense at all in achieving its intended goal, Treasury will have to pay a premium for this toxic financial waste. The taxpayer will ultimately eat this waste no matter what warrants, equity, or other arrangements are introduced.
The Economy Won't Be Ignored
The proposed legislation does not focus on the right problem. The critical underlying problem in our economy is the growing number of foreclosures and associated decline in the US real estate market. This bill will not address the core problem in any meaningful way.
The proposed legislation is inadequate to the task it is intended to tackle. Although $700 billion dollars is huge sum, the Treasury and Federal Reserve have already extended over a half-trillion dollars in direct aid or guarantees to Wall Street—and credit conditions have worsened.
The proposed legislation will not result in significantly expanded credit available from Wall Street to Main Street. Because of their huge leverage—20-30 times their capital—the banks will need virtually every sent to shore up their capital reserves. The half-trillion dollars already extended to Wall Street has accomplished nothing in easing credit conditions.
The proposed legislation will ultimately leave the US taxpayer with hundreds of billions of dollars in losses added to the national debt and our taxes. To make any sense at all in achieving its intended goal, Treasury will have to pay a premium for this toxic financial waste. The taxpayer will ultimately eat this waste no matter what warrants, equity, or other arrangements are introduced.
The additional national debt and taxation burden will come at a time when Americans will be in a substantial recession and least able to afford it.
Bush's Speech: Surprisingly Coherent
First, it was FEAR of Al Qaeda to justify the torture (OK, "enhanced interrogation") of prisoners, deprivation of civil and human rights for accused terrorists at Guantanamo, warrantless and illegal wire taps of Americans in their homes and workplaces, and the creation of the bureaucratic beast of the Department of Homeland Security.
Second, it was FEAR of a nuclear-armed Iraq that might attack the United States that led to the Bush Doctrine (ask Sara Palin if you don't know what it is), the use of an elaborate, yet seemingly authoritative lie in the Iraq WMD national intelligence estimate to justify an invasion, and the absolutely unnecessary loss of more than 4,000 brave young men and women and waste of one trillion dollars (or more depending on whose numbers you use) over nearly six years. And, the underlying premise of the invasion--a prospectively nuclear-armed Iraq tied to Al Qaeda--was known to be a lie at the outset. I won't even get into the horrendous mis-management and lack of leadership over the military campaign.
Now, having found a basis in FEAR for attacking our most precious civil liberties and destroying the century-long role of America as the moral leader of the developed world, Bush and his cronies are using FEAR to drive America to make outrageously stupid economic security policies. His speech last night was nothing except about FEAR and the warning that if Americans don't follow his lead, we will all live through an economic h***.
Leadership can not be based on FEAR alone as it has been now for eight years. It must be built on a motivating vision for a better world, a clear understanding of the complexities of achieving that vision and the limitations of the policy and other tools in that effort, and an appreciation that the American people seek the opportunity to excel, not act in irrational FEAR.
FDR said, "The only thing we have to FEAR is FEAR itself." I FEAR leaders who can only try to motivate through FEAR. It is negative, irrational, and ultimately leads to greater societal losses than gains.
We've Crossed the Line from Capitalism to Socialism
Moreover, while offering the Secretary of the Treasury unlimited authority and $700 billion to bail out his friends on Wall Street, the only thing the other 300 million Americans will get is a larger national debt and a bigger tax bill.
If there is going to be an effort to stabilize financial markets involving large sums of taxpayer money, it needs some balance. For example:
--The boards of directors and executive committees (and maybe others) at the banks receiving US taxpayer money are automatically fired, forced to return their ill-gotten bonuses for the last 3 or more years, and banned from any executive or board position in a publicly-traded US company for 5 years. (Its the Millken solution.)
--Ban the creation, sale, purchase, or brokering of any asset-backed credit derivative by any bank operating in the United States. Similarly, ban the placement of any asset-backed security in foreign credit derivatives.
--Every American taxpayer receives a stimulus check of approximately $6,300 to offset the cost he/she will absorb for this $700 billion bailout. (It makes as much sense as spending the money on banks that knowingly took excessive risks for big profits.)
--The $700 billion may only be used to acquire the mortgage-based assets of US banks (only) that are insolvent, not just illiquid. This was the way the RTC handled assets. Otherwise, the bailout only rewards the outrageous behavior of the banking sector and its shareholders--not all Americans. (So, it could buy LEH assets, but not GS or MER assets.)
--Require that the money be used to acquire a just less than 80% equity in the bank (a la AIG) to ensure effective USG control over banking practices. Also cut out preferred shareholders all together and establish a 30-70% haircut on the bank's outstanding bonds--consistent with the toxicity of its asset holdings.
--Finally, absolutely and completely eliminate any language (such as is the current draft) that puts the Secretary of the Treasury above the law ("non-reviewable&... In fact, put stringent language in that states he must obey all US laws.
The draft legislation is an outrageous effort by the Administration to bail out its buddies. It defies the Constitution, destroys free markets, insults the role of Congress in overseeing national policies and laws, and irrepairably damages all American taxpayers for the benefit of a few.
IT CAN NOT BE PASSED! WRITE YOUR CONGRESSMAN/CONGRESSWO... RIGHT NOW AND TELL HIM OR HER IN CLEAR, SIMPLE, POLITE, AND EVEN CONSTRUCTIVE TERMS WHAT YOU THINK OF THE PROPOSED BAILOUT
Is Wachovia the Worst Run Bank in America?
While Wachovia's history is ignominious, it can't undo the stupidity of previous management (at least not without a huge cost). The real investmnet question is whether the new management is making the situation better or worse. My sense is that is doing so-so which, in this case, probably won't be enough. The new management has to make almost nothing but good decisions for Wachovia to survive.
Expect the Real Rally by Mid-2009
Expect the Real Rally by Mid-2009
I'm sorry, but this doesn't withstand the smell test. If US consumers aren't buying as much and exports are stagnating as (a) the dollar strengthens relative to other currencies and (b) other economies are experiencing their own recessions, employers will continue to lay off staff. The now 6.1% official unemployment rate is likely to exceed 7% by the middle of next year.
On top of this, the boomers may have to retire much later than they want as their savings go up in smoke during the ongoing bull market. So, if you add 3-5 years to their work life (not considering how Congress may push the Social Security retirement age farther down the road to save some pennies), there will be few openings for a new generation of workers looking for jobs.
Finally, when there is an economic recovery, jobs are almost the last category to see gains as employers are uncertain that the recovery will actually continue. Employment is very much a lagging indicator of the economy, more so as the US becomes less focused on manufacturing and more focused on services.
I see no reason, employment or otherwise, that the stock market should rally into a bull market next summer. Once the housing mess has stabilized, permitting the financial sector to stabilize, then maybe we will see a bull market opportunity. I don't think that will happen before 2010 at the earliest.
False Data Clobbers the Markets
....but let's take them one-by-one.....
First, I didn't like the latest GDP numbers anymore than anyone else. It was one of those "this does not compute" moments. But waiting for "better" data is not the answer. While I'll be about the last person to cheer on BEA, it makes clear that the latest estimate is "preliminary"... after its "advanced" estimate a month ago--and it will continue to revise this number as time goes on. Are markets going to wait until the GDP number is 100% accurate before it moves? I don't think so.
And to the extent that the writer believes "inaccurate" NFP estimates cost the DJ some 1500 points, I would say that points to a huge flaw in his modeling approach to the market. The data is what it is; whether you can properly interpret it is your problem.
Second, Steve Jobs' health--or lack thereof--has been the subject of rumors for years. Look how skinny he is, he must be dying of cancer......blah, blah, blah. This isn't data; it's barely information, and it's not new. It is rumor, innuendo, etc., and the likelihood of its being true--no matter how many times it has been repeated--is small. To make investment decisions on that kind of information is stupid, even misfeasance.
Third, explanations for why oil prices go up or down are no better or worse than the explanations given for other market phenomena. Indeed, pundits feel compelled to explain market, stock, or other investment-related events in terms of some kind news event. Once in awhile they get it right, but more often than not, there is no apparent cause and effect relationship. And sometimes they are just plain wrong. Acting on such information without vetting it thoroughly is irresponsible. Until it is vetted, it is not data.
As for the apparent contradiction between slowing population increases in China and India and the growth of the middle class, the writer is confusing a demographic trend and an economic trend. It is quite easy to have a smaller population and larger middle class over time in both real and relative terms. This is not bad data, this is really bad analysis.
Disclosure from Financials? I Call B.S.
In short, garbage in, garbage out. GIGO!
The Great Consumer Crash of 2009
Maybe even more worrisome are the measures the USG will take to get us out of this mess. The more likely will tend to salve the self-inflicted wounds, but not address their systemic basis (such as the much-ballyhooed tax stimulus package). In the end, if we do not do what is necessary to fix our financial system and our own way of living, we will only add pain for ourselves, our children, and our grandchildren.
Don't Believe the Lies: Ride the Bank Stocks Bull
I'm not in financials and won't be for quite awhile--that is, after the truth of the nearly insolvent financial sector slowly emerges.
Wells Fargo Leaves Much Uncertainty in Wake of Latest Earnings
If memory serves, WFC changed its standard for non-performing mortgages from 120 days to 180 days of non-payment for this quarterly report. It cuts the writedowns for the moment, but what a colossal writedown they'll have to report next quarter--unless they find another cute accounting trick to hide reality.
They are really putting lipstick on the pig. I can't wait to hear what cute ideas C used to reduce its writedowns and losses below analysts' expectations. Ultimately, the lies will all come home to roost.
The 'Crisis' in Venture Capital