The top 100 stock
market authors
selected for publication
market authors
selected for publication
Socialism cannot compete!
»
Comments
|
You are currently following Socialism cannot compete!
Stop FollowingYou are no longer following Socialism cannot compete!
-
1728
)
Sort by:
Latest | Highest ratedDear Fed: The Problem is Solvency, Not Liquidity [View article]
Are We Becoming a Nation of Renters? Investing for the New Housing Dynamic [View article]
fairtax.org
On Nov 06 06:45 AM 3percenter wrote:
> There is no such thing as a "homeowner". Stop paying your property
> taxes and find out pretty quickly who really owns your home. I'm
> 35 and have never owned a home. I am still renting and am able to
> put away a good chunk of savings every month. My former neighbors
> who were also tenants, on the other hand, bought their first home
> at the peak of the boom and soon realized they were part of the sub-prime
> borrowers crowd. They are now struggling to stay in their home without
> a dime left over at the end of every month. The American Dream? No
> thanks.
Reacting to Roubini's Predictions: The Economy, Dollar Carry-Trade, Housing [View article]
A New Economic Indicator? [View article]
On Nov 06 12:32 AM JeffDB wrote:
> None of that proves anything, of course, but many *feel* a little
> more on edge, whether it's justified or not.
The Homebuyer Credit as Economic Success Story [View article]
On Nov 06 04:00 AM Mr. Ed, Jr. wrote:
> Then why would it not be better to just give EVERY taxpayer an 8k
> tax credit or just 8k in cash ? Then, all could help stimulate the
> economy, rather than just a small % of citizens who want to buy a
> home.
The Homebuyer Credit as Economic Success Story [View article]
On Nov 05 12:52 PM Tom Armistead wrote:
> Those who can qualify for a mortgage are the middle class, who have
> taken a hosing as the USG has spent billions bailing out TBTF banks.
> So now they get a small recompense. They'll pay it back in taxes.
>
>
> From an economic point of view the point is to reduce supply. This
> country had about 1 million excess single family homes for sale so
> if this mops up some of that supply it helps sustain the asset values
> which is what this is about.
>
> Remember, the asset values underlie a huge, huge amount of MBS, which
> is part of the capital structures of banks and insurance companies.
> TARP was originally supposed to support MBS. This credit for new
> homebuyers actually acieves that goal and could very well prevent
> the double dip recession so many a fearful of.
The Real Job Loss Story: Death of Small Business [View article]
Instead of growing government, stripping our freedoms, and jacking up taxes...some drastic downsizing of government, coupled with REAL TAX CUTS would have this economic ship righted in no time!!!
A New Economic Indicator? [View article]
On Nov 05 11:48 AM Witchy wrote:
> Two lists.
>
> A few people, in mostly random order, who in the past contributed
> much to how we are, who we are, some of our best and brightest, all-time
> most-interesting: Thales, Sophocles, Socrates, Moses, Buddha, Confucius,
> Jesus, Leonardo, Michelangelo, Shakespeare, Copernicus, Galileo,
> Edw. Jenner, Darwin, Dostoevsky, Einstein, Heisenberg, T. Edison,
> Rachel Carson, Roberto Bolano ...
>
> A few people, in mostly random order, currently active and important
> to how we are, who we are, among our best and brightest, most interesting:
> E. O. Wilson, J. Lovelock, Obama, Bernanke, Gore, Jobs, Gates (both),
> Buffett, Branson, Soros, P. Roth, J. Gray, and many more ...
>
> Question: are, were, would any of them be, gun-obsessed?
>
> The gun-nuts are among the lowest of us, those who have the least
> to contribute ... Our Neanderthals ...
Dow Theory Sell Signal? [View article]
Markets Cheer the Buffett Buy [View article]
Buffett's Big Rail Buy: What It Means for Berkshire Shareholders [View article]
5 Questions and Compliments for the U.S. Treasury [View article]
1) Let failure happen and let the free market do the resolving. No, I do *not* believe in a special chapter in bankruptcy law for "too large to fail" banks (or other such companies). The last thing we need is more power and control given to government. They caused this mess with a socialist housing push...and their "solutions" have all involved further curtailing of capitalism...the pillaging of the people and of businesses that were not picked winners.
2) Tax cuts, tax cuts, tax cuts. Let the producers keep more of what is theirs. This will boost employment and allow businesses to shore up balance sheets without bailout money. The "downside"...in order to afford it, big cuts to government will be necessary. Darn.
Homebuyer Tax Credit: Update [View article]
On Oct 28 12:35 PM MyrEnforker wrote:
> Sure, they care about homeowners, but that's not the prime reason.
> It gives the banks more time to repair their balance sheets.
>
> This is STILL ultimately all about the banks.
Contrarians Denninger, Dent, Faber and Hoye Looking for Dollar Rebound [View article]
seekingalpha.com/artic...
Yet, we're supposed to be dollar bullish? Even short-term? I don't think so!!!
Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News [View article]
"Consumer confidence dips." -- Why would that be? The prospect of hugely higher taxes? Watching government take over everything?
"Easing Hilton's towering debt load." -- Will Paris soon be supporting her daddy? Talk about role reversal!
"Tackling too-big-to-fail." -- Funny, I thought free markets that allowed failure already had this accounted for!
"That's a good czar." -- There ARE no good czars!!
"Mortgage apps drop for second straight week." -- Hmmm. Maybe that Keynesian Big Government stuff just doesn't work?!