Socialism cannot compete!

Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News

Do you think that what you wrote even sounds logical?? Ask everyone to pay their share under the law, no matter how flawed it may be? Think about that from a theoretical standpoint -- is it really their "share" if the law is flawed? And the more flawed the tax code becomes, the more unjust the designated "share" would be?! Yet you would say those who have the most unjust share should still pay it? Is there no point at which they are justified in either not paying or in paying some but not all of it? If there is a point, where is that point? These are very real questions that we all need to be asking. Particularly with the way our tax money is being used!!

IMO, I would submit that it is not only the wealthy who are unjustly treated by the current income tax law...but almost everyone who actually pays in!! When you consider the nature of confiscatory taxation, $1 is too much. But when it has become 20...30...40% of gross incomes...how have we not revolted yet???


On Oct 27 10:37 AM TommyG wrote:

> Doubleguns: Yes a revamped tax structure would fix a lot of ills
> but the scum in both houses won't let the their special interests
> get hurt. Meanwhile; is it too much to ask that everybody pays their
> share under the law, however flawed it may be.

Wall Street Breakfast: Must-Know News

Nooooooo!!! They can't have our Kudlow! We need him here!!


On Oct 27 09:34 AM doubleguns wrote:

> Old Trader the translation would be "Me" pronounced with a short
> e like the Canadian eh.
>
> I think they don't have a Kudlow over there is the problem. They
> are much more realistic.:-)
>
> Maybe we could send them our Kudlow for a couple of years.