Mike Havrilla is a former pharmacist (retail and home infusion settings), biotech stock trader, and writer with experience that includes full-time online trading since 2009, working as a full-time pharmacist from 2004-2009, and writing for investors since 2007. Mike holds Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) and Bachelor of Science (Biology) degrees from the University of Pittsburgh and worked in the pharmaceutical industry for Wyeth prior to pharmacy school. He is also an avid runner and has completed over 20 marathons with a personal best time under three hours for the 26.2 mile race and under 80 minutes for the half marathon. Mike merged his former publishing business with BioRunUp.com / Mark Messier in October 2010, creating a new online biotech stock research and trading subscription service.
Born: September 5th 1982
Location: Queens/Long Island, New York
Marital Status: Engaged
Children: Zoey Marie
Academic: Towson University, B.S. 2006
Major: Political Science
Minor(s): English, Economics, & Mathematics
I've had a love for the securities markets since I was about 8 years old, and received my first subscription to the Wall Street Journal at 11. I've been obsessed with such mathematical concepts as M-Theory and Chaos Theory since my early days of High School, and have always had a fascination with numbers.
Leonard is an editor of BioTuesdays.com. Before joining the blog, Leonard amassed 36 years of experience as a financial journalist, editor and manager with The Wall Street Journal and Dow Jones News Service, and The Globe and Mail’s Report on Business, where he pioneered the development and launch of the newspaper’s Money & Markets section in the early 1990s. Most recently, he was Canada’s leading biotechnology and healthcare writer, as well as the author of a highly popular stock market blog on globeandmail.com.
Nicholas Smith is currently a financial analyst for Yahoo. He graduated from Creighton University with majors in finance and accounting. He has over three years of experience working as an analyst in a variety of fields, including investment research, corporate FP&A and private equity. His three years working as an analyst combined with the experience he has obtained trading stocks over the past five years have provided him with a unique perspective on the financial markets.
Rich Steffens has grown up in New Jersey, is a successful businessman, and follows social media trends amongst life science and biotech companies. His family is deeply influenced by the ill effects of diabetes, and is a kidney donor to his older sister. His area of interests also includes cancer immunotherapy, which he started writing about in 2008. Rich jokes that he is one of the world's slowest marathon runners, and he runs with MSKCCs Fred's Team to support cancer research, raising over $20,000 in ten years to support MSKCCs efforts.
Rich states- I am not qualified to offer investment or medical advice, and make no claims that I am an expert in these areas. I seek to share and learn.
A retail pharmacist, I have worked as a pharmacist in hospitals and ambulatory care as both a clinician and manager. I also have 12 years experience as a registered nurse in hospitals again as a clinician and manager. I am particularly interested in healthcare economics with a subinterest in pharmaco-economics issues.
Blogger, Self-Made Analyst, Trader, Investor, Crowdfunder and Critical Thinker. Currently, I am looking for a job in the investment space. Job offers are always welcome.
The name "Dutch Trader" refers to The Golden Age. This was a period in Dutch history, roughly spanning the 17th century, in which Dutch trade, science, military and art were among the most acclaimed in the world.
Dutch ships hunted whales off Svalbard, traded spices in India and Indonesia (via the Dutch East India Company) and founded colonies in New Amsterdam (now New York), South Africa and the West Indies. In addition some Portuguese colonies were conquered, namely in Northeastern Brazil, Angola, Indonesia and Ceylon. This new nation flourished culturally and economically, creating what historian Simon Schama has called an "embarrassment of riches". Speculation in the tulip trade led to a first stock market crash in 1637, but the economic crisis was soon overcome.
In 1602 the Dutch East India Company was founded. It was the first-ever multinational corporation, financed by shares that established the first modern stock exchange. This company received a Dutch monopoly on Asian trade and would keep this for two centuries. It became the world's largest commercial enterprise of the 17th century. Spices were imported in bulk and brought huge profits, due to the efforts and risks involved and seemingly insatiable demand.
To finance the growing trade within the region, the Bank of Amsterdam was established in 1609, the precursor to, if not the first true central bank.
My background is Management, Economics and Law. This I studied at Fontys Business School in the Netherlands, with specialization in Banking and Insurance.
My passion is investing, writing, travelling, history, swimming, playing chess and enjoying my family.
I love to analyze companies and sectors and write about it. Main points of interests: China, Biotechnology, Consumer, Energy, Mining, Dividend, OTC Market, Food, Robotics and some other themes.
As an investor I have a bias towards value investing and the markets. All opinions are my own and do not represent the views of my employer.Valuation metrics play an important part of my investment strategies. My investment philosophy is Unloved, Underowned and Undervalued.
One of the best investment quotes is: The key to making money in stocks is not to get scared out of them from Peter Lynch.
Do you have any other business proposals or questions, just write an email to firstname.lastname@example.org
Dutch Trader, The Netherlands================
For the Securities Disclaimer & Disclosure, read:
I am primarily an investor interested in creating passive income streams through dividends. I focus on finding and analyzing dividend paying stocks, MLPs and REITs that are a good fit for income investors.
I practice Judaism and my faith is very important to me. I visit family in Israel once a year, but I am educated and work in the United States where I hold an MBA and a bachelor's in English. I am a patient man, enjoy wine but am not a connoisseur, and I listen more than I speak.
Follow @SmithOnStocks on Twitter for more updates (http://twitter.com/#SmithOnStocks
Please read this section carefully for some important disclosures.
Who Am I?
My name is Larry Smith. My career was spent on Wall Street as a biotechnology and pharmaceuticals analyst and also as Director of Research at Smith Barney and Hambrecht and Quist. On my website, SmithOnStocks, which can be addressed from this Seeking Alpha site, I publish articles on biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies. I attempt to be objective and present a balanced view of negatives and positives. Readers should not rely on Seeking Alpha for my latest views and articles on Seeking Alpha should be viewed as informational only. The reports section of my website reflects my most current view on a stock.
How Do I Get Paid?
My only source of revenues from my articles is from subscription revenues from my website. I do not receive any compensation from companies or investor relations firms to write articles. I do not receive any direct or indirect compensation from hedge funds, other investment managers or any entity to write articles. I consider direct compensation to be cash compensation that is directly or indirectly tied to my writing articles.
I also do not receive compensation in the form of content. I believe that it is not uncommon for some writers to receive content from hedge funds, other investment managers or any entity that are critical components of the articles that they write. I consider this as non-cash compensation. I do not receive advertising revenues from my website so there is no incentive to be sensational in order to create page hits. I only get paid if my subscribers believe that my articles are of value to them and they then decide to subscribe to my services.
You Should View Articles Published on Seeking Alpha as Informational Only
I want to make clear to readers that not all of the reports that I publish on my website are also published on Seeking Alpha. Also, I will sometimes make reports available on my website a significant period of time before publishing the same or a condensed version on Seeking Alpha. All of the articles that are published on Seeking Alpha and my website at the same time have consistent views and opinions. However, at a later data, it may be the case that my viewpoint and opinion may change and these changes in viewpoint and opinion may only be published in articles on my website.
For this reason, readers may want to check the reports section on my website for my current opinion on a stock and should not rely on the latest Seeking Alpha article as my viewpoint or opinion may have changed. The content on my website is intended only for subscribers, but non-subscribers can view the headlines in the reports section which in most cases but not all will announce a change in viewpoint or opinion. However, I emphasize that I undertake no obligation to update my articles on Seeking Alpha and the latest article on Seeking Alpha may not reflect my latest thinking. This is why I want to re-emphasize that any article published on Seeking Alpha should be viewed as information only.
What SmithOn Stocks is All About
SmithOnStocks is not registered as a securities broker-dealer or as an investment adviser with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or with any state securities regulatory authority. SOS relies solely on publicly disclosed and available information. While SOS makes all reasonable efforts to confirm the accuracy of its statements and opinions, all comments should be considered only as opinion and should not be considered to be absolute fact. Investors should carefully read the Terms & Conditions and Disclosures sections of my website. Investors should carefully perform their own due diligence, seek other points of view and consult with their broker or financial advisor.
Investing in equities includes considerable risk, and investors should be prepared for the possibility of capital loss. This is particularly the case with biotechnology stocks in which hard to predict clinical and commercial outcomes can often disappoint investors and lead to unusually large declines in price. Potential investors in biotechnology stocks must often be prepared to risk the loss of substantially all of their investment. These stocks are only suitable for investors willing and able to accept unusually high financial risk. Users of my information acknowledge that SOS and its owner are not liable to any person or entity for the accuracy, thoroughness, reliability, or timeliness of the information provided. Users further acknowledge that SOS is also not responsible for any direct or indirect losses that may arise from the use of information provided to any person or entity.
Employees of SmithOnStocks or SOS do buy and sell healthcare stocks, some of which may be the subject of written articles appearing on Seeking Alpha. In the event that employees have a stock investment in a company, that ownership is fully disclosed in notes on Seeking Alpha. On any new recommendation, I have a 48 hour waiting period before initiating a position in a stock. I trade in line with my recommendations.
In 1999 I made an ethical breach that resulted in a suspension from being a registered representative in the securities industry for a period of time. I believe that this measure was harsh beyond any reasonable measure and totally unwarranted. I have gone to great lengths in this report to give my side of the story and I hope that you will read the in-depth account that I have provided. This took place over 16 years ago and has long since ended. There has been no restriction from the NYSE for many years on my working as a registered representative if I choose to go through the required registration procedures.
Still, this NYSE action is like a Scarlett letter that I carry. I would urge you to read the full account of the events that led to this NYSE action and if you do so I believe you will agree that this in no way reflects on my integrity and the way I have always conducted myself, then and now. I strongly believe that the action taken was excessive and I think that if you read my full account you will agree.
People make mistakes. Bill Clinton lied under oath, was impeached and disbarred as a lawyer in Arkansas in connection with the Monica Lewinsky affair. However, society has judged him on the body of work that he has done. Suspensions in the security industry can result from serious infractions in which investors are defrauded or swindled. In the events that led to my suspension no investors lost money and as I explain in this report investors who followed my advice made significant amounts of money. Before you rush to any conclusions, let me tell you my story.
I Am Proud in How I Have Conducted My Career
Before I go into the details of this ethical breach, I want to emphasize that I have had a distinguished career on Wall Street. My record from 1971 when I started on Wall Street until 1999 was unblemished. I came to New York from Indiana with no business connections and no money but through hard work I became a highly regarded Wall Street analyst and was selected to the Institutional Investor All Star team in pharmaceuticals for ten years in a row. Based on my record as being the top or one of the top analysts at Smith Barney, I was selected to be head of research from 1981 until 1989. I also served on the Board of Directors at Smith Barney.
Based on my strong reputation, Hambrecht and Quist approached me in 1989 to head their life sciences research effort and to run the annual H&Q (now JP Morgan) healthcare conference. I was a Managing Director and on the operating committee at H&Q. I left H&Q in the late 1990s because I disliked the bureaucracy that was such an integral part of being head of research. I had made enough money to be financially secure and I wanted to get back into doing what I loved, biotechnology research. I joined Tucker Anthony in 1997 as a biotechnology analyst.
Explaining the Events That Led to the NYSE Issue
Tucker Anthony had a sister firm called Sutro and a decision was made early in 1998 to move health care research from Tucker to Sutro. Tucker was an east coast based firm and Sutro was based in Los Angeles. Sutro leased a New York office to which I moved. It was here that an unfortunate train of events was set in motion that led to the NYSE action that put a stain on what I consider an outstanding career.
When I moved from Tucker to Sutro, I maintained my brokerage accounts at Tucker. I conducted normal trading in this account for some months. Then the research administrative research manager for Sutro contacted me and said that for regulatory purposes I would have to move my account from Tucker to Sutro. After some time spent in looking for a broker to handle my account at Sutro I became frustrated. At that time, I had over $5 million in my brokerage accounts. While I was sophisticated in health care investing which made up 10% of my portfolio, I needed help with other parts of the portfolio. I could find no retail broker at Sutro that I wanted to trust my portfolio to. I asked and received approval to look for a broker outside of Sutro and contacted Schwab about finding an investment advisor there to manage my account.
While this was in process, the research administrative manager at Sutro called again and said that Sutro was probably planning to shut down the New York office and I would have to move to Los Angeles or leave the firm. Moving to Los Angeles was not an option for me as my roots were deep in New York. I informed her that given this choice I would soon be leaving Sutro rather then moving to Los Angeles and began to think about what to do. I came to the preliminary conclusion that I would start a consulting firm dealing in biotechnology. I also concluded that I would have to carefully manage my investment portfolio.
It was here that I made a major mistake that I have regretted ever since. Frustrated that my money was tied up in Tucker and I was unable to trade in my account and unable to find a broker that I trusted, I decided to open an account at Schwab without a broker managing it. I indicated on the account transfer form that I was self-employed based on the assumption that I was going to be leaving Sutro imminently. This was my Bill Clinton moment and turned out to be a major mistake.
I continued to work at Sutro while I was waiting for the New York office to be closed which I thought would be in a matter of days or weeks and during this time, I began to execute trades in my account at Schwab. However, after some weeks the research administrative manager at Sutro called and informed me that based on the response they had gotten from clients and the work that I was doing that the firm had reversed itself and now wanted to keep the office in New York and they were also willing to hire two assistants to aid me. There was also the promise of a significant bonus in the upcoming review that based on my work could amount to several hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Not surprisingly, I decided to stay on at Sutro instead of leaving and starting my own firm. I then looked for and finally found a Sutro broker that I could trust to help manage my portfolio. The brokerage accounts at Schwab were opened in February of 1999 and transferred to Sutro in April 1999. When I moved my accounts to Sutro the compliance department at Sutro saw that there was this hiatus when I had an unauthorized account at another firm. This was reported to NYSE.
NYSE Reviewed My Case and Took No Action for Three Years
Management at Sutro looked very closely at what had occurred and decided that while it was certainly not something they could condone, it was a minor infraction and they thought that given my stellar and unblemished record that NYSE would not take any meaningful action other than a wrist slap. Sutro decided to be pre-emptive in administering the wrist slap and fined me and suspended me for one month. They thought that this would satisfy NYSE based on their interpretation of what had occurred. They wanted me to continue with the firm, paid the sizable bonus I was due and committed to picki up all legal fees.
I then had a deposition with a lawyer from NYSE in early 2000. During a one day interview, he went over all of the details of the accounts that were held at Schwab and all of the trades that occurred in detail. He also looked at all of the reports that I had issued as an analyst during this time to compare to the trading in my account to the issuance of research reports. I then heard nothing more from the NYSE for three years.
Sutro concluded as did I that this issue was behind us. Three years later in mid-2003, I heard from NYSE to my shock that they were re-opening the case. Why after three years was the case being re-opened? In talking to the lawyers at NYSE, I came to understand that this was the result of Elliott Spitzer’s attack on Wall Street research. Remember the famous case of Henry Blodgett who recommended stocks of investment banking clients to clients that he thought were actually sales.
NYSE enforcement was under pressure because this unethical practice had been brought to light by Spitzer and they had missed it. They were under pressure to show how tough they could be as enforcers. They reviewed their records and came up with my case which they decided to reopen it in order to show that they were aggressive enforcers.
They went over the same information that had been gathered in early 2000, but came up with an entirely different interpretation. They said that I effected stock transactions shortly before issuance of research reports which I had prepared and this was a violation of Exchange Rule 472.40(2) (iii). They also said that I failed to disclose that I held securities in stocks recommended in a research report. They said that I opened accounts at a member firm that concealed fact of my employment at another member firm; violated Exchange Rule 407(b). They recommended a censure and two and one-half year suspension.
Two Stock Trades at Question
The information on opening an account at another firm is something that I just discussed at length. This was not in dispute. However, NYSE focused on two stock trades that I made and explained the suspension largely on the basis of these two trades. I believe that they were clearly wrong in their conclusions. Let me discuss those trades in detail.
The first trade was in Stericycle, a medical waste disposal company. I had been following the company for some time with a neutral rating. In my reports, I noted that the Company wanted to buy the medical waste disposal business of Waste Management and if they were successful, I would immediately go to a strong buy.
This acquisition was announced on April 14, 2009 after the close at 4 PM EST. Because it was 1 PM in Los Angeles I held a conference call with Sutro’s traders and the salesforce and told them I was going to a strong buy on the stock. It was the practice of Sutro to initiate new ideas with a conference call in this manner. The traders and sales force would then go out to the clients with the idea. After this, the analyst would follow-up by publishing a note on First Call (an electronic distribution network) and this was done on April 15 This was then followed up by a written research report on April 16. On April 16, I bought 2500 shares of the stock at a price of $12. This was accepted practice at Sutro for research analysts buying stocks that they recommended. There was no requirement to wait for a period of time to buy the stock. The analyst was allowed to buy the stock at the same time as other Sutro employees and clients
The NYSE judged my conduct on standards that were different from those that were accepted practices at Sutro. By today’s standards, the Sutro practices seem very loose but they were common at the time. This is why Sutro did not view this trade as a breach of conduct and kept me as an analyst. The NYSE also said that I did not disclose that I owned Stericycle in my written report. However, none of the analysts at Sutro were required at the time to do so. This was also standard operating procedure.
Stericycle was a major success for investors. Adjusting for stock splits the stock traded at about $3.00 when I first recommended it. Fifteen years later, the stock is trading at about $119. This was one of my best recommendations ever. I held the Stericycle stock for many years and only sold it recently.
The NYSE did not accept that my actions were in line with the practices of Sutro even though I produced a letter to that effect from the research administrative officer. I also argued that a $30,000 investment in a portfolio that amounted to $5 million at the time was de minimus. I argued that the stock was bought and maintained as a long term investment. I argued that it was an excellent money making idea for investors. The NYSE dismissed all of these arguments and maintained that I traded ahead of my recommendation.
The second trade that the NYSE emphasized was a trade in Schering Plough. On April 18, the stock had traded down by 5%. I had an accumulate rating on the stock essentially telling investors to buy the stock for the long term, but connoting less emphasis than a buy. In the morning call to traders and salesmen, I alerted them to the price weakness, but told them there was no change in the fundamental outlook and there was no change in my price target. I was not intending to issue a report, but the research administrative manager told me that the price drop in Schering Plough based on my price target indicated 25% upside that was the accepted criteria for a buy recommendation. Hence, I needed to put out a report in which I upgraded my opinion from accumulate to buy.
I bought the stock on April 20 at the same time as the written report was issued. I previously owned 500 shares and this increased my position to 1000 shares for a total investment of about $35,000 which again was within a $5 million portfolio. The NYSE again accused me of the same things as in the Stericycle situation. They said that I traded ahead of my recommendation and did not disclose that I owned the stock. My responses were the same as for Stericycle and were once again rejected.
Was The NYSE Action Justified?
I think that the NYSE action was out of all proportion to what actually transpired. I think the enforcement officers applied new standards in overturning the prior decision to take no action on this case that had been in effect for three years. They were under pressure to make a big splash in the Elliot Spitzer era to show how tough they were. My recommendations were solid recommendations and indeed the Stericycle recommendation was outstanding.
I fully recognize that my decision to open the brokerage account at Schwab prior to resigning from Sutro was an ethical breach on my part even if I was planning to resign from Sutro. When I decided to stay with Sutro, I transferred my accounts immediately. I strongly and absolutely maintain that my trading in Schering-Plough and Stericycle was in accordance with policies in place at Sutro at the time. By today’s standards these seem loose, but this was common industry practice at the time.
The NYSE review was conducted by a mediator and it was he that determined the punishment. He had spent his entire career as an enforcement officer for the NYSE. He was also friends with the NYSE lawyers on my case and sent out to lunch with them during the hearing. He was the judge, jury and executioner of my fate. As I look back, I question his objectivity and motives. In writing his opinion, he did not acknowledge documents from Sutro that showed that my stock trading disclosures were in-line with their internal procedures. I had no opportunity to review or correct his opinion in the opinion he wrote. In a country in which, guilt or innocence is established by one’s peers, mine was determined by a hanging judge with no experience in the securities business and an apparent pre-determined view on my actions.
I research early (micro cap) and mid phase publicly traded companies in the Biotechnology and Medical Device sectors that are harder to at times find information on for investors. I believe that these companies, although potentially more volatile than their larger cap retail counterparts, hold great value. With a clear understanding of where their product is positioned in the market, the capitalization and the team, these smaller companies can hold incredible value over the long term.
I have a varied background in both business and in the technical sector. Currently, I also am a co founder of BCN Biosciences in Pasadena CA, a privately held biotechnology company in addition to holding a research faculty position at the University of California Los Angeles Department of Radiation Oncology.
I am a small-time writer/blogger who dreams big and enjoys researching and writing about biotechs and pharmaceuticals. My work experiences include food safety, water quality, pesticides, food additives, paints, plastics and pharmaceutical precursors. My focus as of late has been researching the treatment options for many cancers and prevention of their recurrence. Additional recent research has been in the stem cell field, an exciting field in its infancy but now becoming a teenager! My ongoing goal for investors is attempting to find under-the-radar or oversold pharmaceuticals or biotechs for investment potential.
I am currently employed by a Fortune 20 company, on any given day I am assessing risk management and the financial health of various companies. My time is spent looking at charts and numbers all day and I specialize in statistical analysis. I use the writers of various finance sites for my investing ideas, then do my own research prior to investing.
Thanks to those of you that have given me feedback and responded to my messages. I have found the writers at Seeking Alpha to be very accommodating and informative.
My firm provides investment products and solutions for institutions and individual investors. I take particular attention to small and mid-cap companies in emerging markets. I like to research and trade good ideas; both long and short; with other experienced traders.
VFC is just a guy with an opinion. VFC's Stock House brings new ideas to the table and opens discussions for a broad spectrum of investors, with a strong focus on - but not limited to - the biotech, pharmaceutical and healthcare sectors. VFC's Stock House provides research, informational and opinion-based coverage of various companies and stocks in multiple sectors.
The information contained within the pages of VFC’s Stock House are not intended to be taken as advice, but as a starting point where investors can follow up with their own DD and devise their own entry and exit strategies. Do not Buy/Sell based solely on VFC's ideas or opinions.
The goal of VFC's Stock House is to 'call it like I see it' - while bringing new ideas, companies, and discussions to the eyes of investors and readers. This is supposed to be fun and new investors should not invest with the idea that this will 'pay the bills' or with the belief that a stock will just keep going up. DD is paramount, but so is sticking to pre-conceived entry and exit strategies and not letting emotional trading get in the way.
Goals must be realistic, if it sounds far fetched, then it probably is. Let the big boys eat the cake - the small investor is just trying to pick up some crumbs, and there's nothing wrong with that!
As an avid stock trader I am always searching for new opportunities. I utilize a very research heavy approach in my strategy that has done quite well for me over the years. I have earned a degree in Physics and an MBA in Finance. Although my educational background is an unconventional pairing, both have served me well. I am currently a consultant that specializes in small business development.
1. Ph.D 1982, University of Athens, Athens, Greece, Biochemistry, Mentor Professor Dr. Constantine Sekeris.
2. M.Sc 1972, University of Bucharest, School of Chemistry, Bucharest, Romania,Biochemistry.Mentor Associate Professor Dr. Ion F. Dumitru.
1.”Visiting” Scientist, Department of Immunology, U.T.M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Anderson,Houston, Texas 77030, (“M. D. Anderson”), Mentor: Dr. Chris D. Platsoucas, 9/1985 - 9/1987.
(“Visiting Scientist” for J-1 Visa is Post-Doctoral Fellow, with >3 years post PhD experience from Foreign Countries)
2.”Visiting” Scientist, Department of Microbiology, Mt. Sinai School of Medicine, New York, 10029, Mentor: Dr. Constantin A. Bona, 4/1985 - 9/1985.
3.Assistant Professor of Research, Department of Immunology, Hellenic Anticancer Institute, Athens, Greece, Mentor: Dr. Michael Papamichail, 9/1981 - 3/1985. (Official title: 3rd Researcher salary & Rank Asst Professor).
1991-2010. Assisted with Greek and Romanian Language and referral of foreign patents.
1.Chemist I and Chemist II, Department of Bacterial Biochemistry, Cantacuzino Institute for Immunology,
Microbiology and Vaccines, Bucharest, Romania. (“Cantacuzino Institute”), 1972 − 1975.
2. Assistant Director,Culture Media Laboratory,Cantacuzino Institute, 1972-1975.
3.Chemist-III, (highest rank) Department of Virology, Cantacuzino Institute, 1975 − 1978
4. Research Assistant, Department of Immunology, Hellenic Anticancer Institute, 10/78 − 8/81,
5. Assistant Immunologist and Assistant Professor of Immunology (Gynecology), Department of Gynecologic
Oncology, (“Gyn-Oncol)”, MDAnderson,77030,10/87 − 8/93.
7. Associate Immunologist and Associate Professor of Immunology Gyn-Oncol, MD Anderson, 1993 − 1999.
8. Assistant Director, Immunology and Molecular Biology, Gyn-Oncol, MD. Anderson, 1988 – 1995.
9. Professor of Immunology, Gyn-Oncol, MD Anderson, 9/2000-8/31/2008.
10. Professor, Experimental Therapeutics, MD Anderson, 9/2008-1/2010.
11. Director,Immunology &Vaccine Research Laboratory,Gyn-Oncol. MD Anderson 1998 – 2010. Saved >
$ 87,000.00 in administrative costs to MDAnderson, 5/20/2005-8/31/2008.
12. Member, University of Texas Health Science Center, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston
13. Affiliated Member, The Center of Minority Health.
14.Terminated. Leave as Principal and only Caretaker, 2/1/2010-5/10/2011,now private profession.
DURABLE DISCOVERIES AND FEDERALY FUNDED -INVENTIONS PATENTED
1. USP 8,258,261 9/4/2012.Divisional.Induction of tumor immunity by variants of folate binding protein Ioannides CG, Peoples, Jr.; George E, Kathleen Ann (Newton, MA) Assignee HJF
2. USP 7,547,759, 6/16/2009. Cancer immunity by variants of folate binding protein. Ioannides CG and Peoples, GE Assignee UT System Board of Regents (Board)
3. USP 7,348,153, 3/25/2008. Novel melanoma peptide-vaccines derived from the high molecular weight proteoglycan antigen. Ferrone S, Ioannides CG, Kawano, K, Murray, JL. Assignee Board.
4. USP’ 6,514,942, 2/4/2003. Methods and compositions for stimulating T-lymphocytes.Ioannides CG, Bryan Fisk B and Ioannides, MG. Assignee Board
5. USP 5,434,076 7,1995. Human ovarian tumor-specific monoclonal antibodies. R.S. Freedman, C. G. Ioannides, R. Patenia, and B. Tomasovic. Assignee Board.
6. USPA: 10/507,009 Pending. Controlled modulation of immunogenicity by amino acid side length. Ioannides CG O’Brian CA, Campbell M, Peoples GE. Assignee Board.
PATENT APPLICATIONS TO BE REVIVED
7. USPA 12,529,759 Submitted 3/09/2009. Cancer therapy by Notch and Numb tumor antigens. Ioannides CG, Matsueda S ,Mine T, Li Yufeng. Assignee: Board.
8.USPA 12,262,402 Submitted 01/05/2010. Mosaic helper peptides. Ioannides CG, Murray JL, Peoples GE, Efferson C, Kawano K, Tsuda N, Matsueda S, Li Yufeng. Assignee: Board
INVENTIONS CLOSED, (INACTIVE), DUE TO FIRING 2010
9. Cancer Therapy by designed micro-RNA. Tsuda N, Kawano K, Chang DZ, Ioannides CG. 2007.
10. Priming of Th1 help and modulation by cytokines with opposed effects for cancer vaccination. Murray, JL, Kuerer H, O'Brian CA. and Ioannides, CG,2001.
11. Short pyknons in human RNA as anticancer agents. Li Y, Ioannides, CG. MDACC 09-094.2009.
EXTERNAL FUNDS: $ 4,091,298.10 in 23 years, (1992-2015), not adjusted for inflation.
Follow me on https://twitter.com/#!/RobertWeinstein
Owner of 1 Reason Insurance, a full-line insurance agency licensed in Wisconsin and Minnesota, and 1 Reason Real Estate, licensed in Wisconsin. http;//1reason.com
Let's connect on Linkedin http://www.linkedin.com/pub/robert-weinstein/12/129/651
Google + Profile https://plus.google.com/110309851050284795454
Contributor to StockSaints' weekly Options Investing newsletter
Robert Weinstein is an active trader focusing on the psychological importance of risk mitigation, emotion and financial behavior of market participants. Robert co-founded the investing blog StockSaints, where he writes a journal about his trading activity and experiences.
Grant Zeng has over 10 years of professional experience in equity research and analysis. Grant joined Zacks Investment Research Inc. in March 2006, and currently is a senior equity analyst covering biotech/pharma industry. Before joining Zacks, Grant worked for TheStreet.com as a biotech analyst from 2005-2006. From Sept 2001 to December 2003, Grant worked for China Pacific Insurance Co. as an senior equity/fund analyst. Grant was a healthcare equity analyst with Young & Partners, LLC from Aug 2000 to September 2001. Grant had also teaching and researching experience in pharmaceutical science.
Grant Zeng obtained his MBA with a major in Finance in 2000 from McMaster University, Canada. He also holds a Master of Science in Biochemistry from the University of Western Ontario, Canada; Master of Pharmacology and Bachelor of Medicine from Second Military Medical University, China.
Grant Zeng is a Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) charter holder.
Author of the critically acclaimed book, "Taking Charge With Value Investing (McGraw-Hill, 2013)" and the premium subscription service "Tipping The Scale" (as seen below). An analyst that ranks in the top 4% on both tipranks.com and Motley Fool CAPS for stock picking performance.
Tipping the Scale members gain access to the TTS Portfolio Tracker. Here, members see what I am buying and selling the minute it happens, along with what I have owned, bought, and sold historically. These are just a few of the features on the TTS Portfolio Tracker.
Tipping The Scale is an equity research platform that uses a numeric scale instead of the traditional "Buy, Hold, Sell" to identify the best investment opportunities in the market. Stock coverage is determined by market catalyst, and every company goes through a vigorous test in 10 different categories. The higher the total score, the bigger the upside. In addition, Tipping the Scale also provides a number of portfolio strategies to hedge the volatility of the market and protect from downside.
Check out my instablog for more information on the popular research service Tipping the Scale, including performance information, benefits, and how it all works.
After two decades as an investment banker, analyst or portfolio manager for major Wall Street firms, in 1995 started his own investment firm specializing in M&A and portfolio management for high wealth individuals.
Theodore J. Cohen, Ph.D., a research scientist, has been an investor for more than 50 years. Since 1980, he has focused his attention on investment research and investigative analyses of companies developing therapeutic drugs in the biotech sector. Dr. Cohen is a frequent contributor of Guest Opinions (op-ed pieces) to the Bucks County (PA) Courier Times (circulation: 80,000), where, since 2007, he has addressed such varied subjects as the conflicts of interest (COIs) associated with two members of the Provenge advisory committee (AC); the U.S. Senate’s Durbin Amendment, to tighten COI reviews of FDA AC members; and naked short selling. Cohen is the author of the award-winning novels Death by Wall Street: Rampage of the Bulls (AuthorHouse, 2010) and House of Cards: Dead Men Tell No Tales (Outskirts Press, 2011), which were inspired by real events. The books are available from Amazon.com, B&N, and 26,000 online bookstores worldwide. For details, see http://www.theodore-cohen-novels.com.