John Ryskamp

Bar Continues to Drop Dangerously on What the U.S. Will Accept as Collateral

What is your point? They're trying to keep suburbia in suburbia, and they can only do what suburbia wants them to do. Suburbia is all lies, contradictions, conspiracies and theft. Is it any surprise that politicians' policies are the same?

What do YOU propose to keep a bunch of useless rats in tickytacky suburban houses? I mean, do you EVER look at the facts ON THE GROUND? The suburban enterprise was always doomed, it was always a scam (including that piece of junk you live in). But the logic of it is an iron logic: keep it going until it collapses of its own b.s.

So that's what they're doing. That's what explains all the hide-the-ball, all the hypocrisy, all the flummery. Gee, sound like any society you know of? Like, one whose initials begin with U and S?

What's going to happen is that official unemployment rate will zoom to 50% and then we'll have a revolution. Hopefully, the result won't be Hitler or Stalin. But would YOUR policies be any different? Would YOU guarantee that these slobs would remain in their ridiculous housing? or would you have to "sacrifice" a bunch in order to carry out some crackpot theory of your own?

Get real.

Are We Targeting the Wrong Monetary Aggregates?

What is more, the failure to take cognizance of these 9 things, makes for greater opportunity in the shadow banking system, and greater problems when credit is withdrawn which had been created because these 9 things were not present.

Conclusion? Shadow credit was approximate 12 times, not 3, as much as M2, and as we uncover more of the facts, that number 12 is climbing. It is climbing daily.

Mr. Slater is not imaginative enough to encompass all the corruption involved in Shadow Credit, or the scope of it.