Seeking Alpha

brokerinbirmingham » Comments » QQQQ

  • Obama's New Wall Street [View article]
    My only problem is with BHO restriciting the free flow of capital (human and financial) to where the free market and human freedom of choice in occupation want to go. If poeple want to get rich doing transaction as opposed to writing computer code, who is he to say no? Do we live in the USSR now? Does he have the constitutional power to restrict the pursuit of happiness wherever (legally) one might pursue it? I think he does not. I think BHO is meddling in private enterprise far more dangerously than even FDR would have done. I wish I were as presbyopic as you guys who know exactly where to put people. Since I make my living based on transactions, it would be foolish of me to say my occupation is worthless. Or, do you mean that people who trade for a living do not contribute to the economy? I mean, a transaction is a connection of a seller and a buyer - whether it's a car, a house, or a stock. And that's worthless to you? Well, I'll take my worthlessly profitable transactions and commit them in another country. Seems like every country wants to be a hub of these worthless transactions - London, Frankfurt, Tokyo, Dubai, Zurich...wonder why. Oh, that's right! Capital gains! Commissions! Fees! Worthless crap. I agree. My bad. Too bad there won't be a banker to lend me money for my new home, or a real estate agent to help me sell my old home. THey gave up on worthless transactions business and started writing computer code.
    May 07 10:32 am |Rating: +2 -5 |Link to Comment
  • Obama's New Wall Street [View article]
    Interesting that BHO believes his policies can gut the financial industry talent (to say nothing of the sector's ability to offset risk by dirivative trading) and yet it stays competitve. One wonders, what if we apply the same ideas to the tech sector. Let's say we tell the bosses of MSFT, DELL, CSCO, and ORCL, "we're going to kill your profit motive, but hey, you'll still be competitve. No more multi-millionaires for you, but I'm sure you'll always attract the top talent. Don't worry, if you make too much money we'll be there to skim it off the top for you. And we've got these great bureaucrats to help you engineer the best technology in the world. They know jack sh-t about computers, but they did raise money for my campaign, so they're qualified." The thought makes my leg tingle. Oh wait, that's no tingle, it's BHO trying to pick my pocket again.
    May 07 09:33 am |Rating: +6 -4 |Link to Comment
  • Judging Obama's First 100 Days [View article]
    Barak claims he inherited the economic condition from President Bush. So Barak takes no blame for the probelmatic issues, and claims victory for the successes. How insipid. How invidious.
    Sophistry at it's best. So, Barak is only President of successful endeavours after the fact now? Anything that doens't work out was Bush's fault? Conservatives can find a lot of fault with Bush (both of them) and they do. But one thing you have to give them credit for is NOT blaming everything they can't handle on the predecessor President.
    "Compromise is the negation of leadership." - Margaret Thatcher
    May 05 11:07 am |Rating: +3 0 |Link to Comment
More on QQQQ by brokerinbirmingham
Comments by Ticker
brokerinbirmingham's
Comments Stats
38 comments
Rating: 24 (55 - 31 )