ADX

Total Rating:
0 / 0

1 Comment

    • Thu Jan 17th 13:35 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Net Neutrality - Tragedy of the Commons (T, VZ, BLS)
      This argument is baseless. If bandwith were to be comoditized as a limited resource then I could see the point to charge consumers. But, Fiber bandwith is unlimited, so therefore you have an unlitmited supply of bandwith.

      4% of consumers that use 50% of unlimited Fiber bandwidth compared to 96% using the other 50% of unlimited bandwidth results in a zero effect on the network and on user experience.

      Plus, since most people's connections are capped between 1.5Mb and 6Mb, then they should be allowed to use that bandwidth fully. This has nothing to do with the consumer. These statistic are based on ISP backbone numbers, which are in fact a fiber optic SONET, which therefore has an unlimted amount of bandwith. The ISP's are just getting a liitle too greedy.

      Plus the Japan numbers don't report any issues with network congestion or other network problems, but simply proves that you have different kinds of internet users. ISP's are trying to frame the issue that these 4% powerusers are steeling bandwith from the rest of the 96% on the backbone, when in fact, there is more bandwith there then what is currently being consumed by everyone. Fiber bandwith is unlimited. There is no base for this argument.
      View article »
Contribute an Article Become a Seeking Alpha Contributor