America Needs a Natural Gas Transportation Infrastructure [View article]
Fitz -- I don't know if you know how to do a text search within my earlier comments, but I did not mention Bush -- pro or con -- except to ridicule your hatred of the man. Your conspiracy theories about 9/11 ranks right up there with the idiots who think the moon landing was faked.
The reason this country doesn't have a better energy policy is because people like George Bush and yourself are involved in the debate. You can protest all you want, but you and he are EXACTLY alike
America Needs a Natural Gas Transportation Infrastructure [View article]
I'll throw Fitz a bone if he promises to lose the tin-foil hat...
The shortfall in NG production currently gets solved by NG imports from Canada. Canada has loads of NG, a stable government, and at least post War of 1812 they have been our allies.
The gotcha is that the Canadian government has dramatically increased taxes on energy production (both crude and NG). This is needed to pay for all the "free" healthcare they have in Canada. The US already subsidizes all the pharmaceutical drugs in Canada (we pay 100% of the research costs, plus part of the production costs for Canadian drugs) -- so I guess Fitz wants the US taxpayer to pay for the rest of Canada's costs?
Of course, he also wants to destroy the water tables out west with lots of shale oil drilling. With less potable water to go around, we don't need to worry about our health
America Needs a Natural Gas Transportation Infrastructure [View article]
SkippinCA -- you are correct. Fitz had a big math error in his article. He plans to make up the shortfall with "go power" -- also known as the stuff that powers Matchbox cars.
Of course, taxpayers will end up footing the bill to actually make this pie-in-the-sky nonsense "work".
Fitz complains about Bush constantly -- and we have all heard about the lady that doth complain too much. Fitz has WAY more in common with Bush than he is willing to admit
America Needs a Natural Gas Transportation Infrastructure [View article]
Fitz -- lose the tinfoil hat and stop whining about all your imaginary conspiracy theories. Do you still think Bush took down tower #7 at the WTC site? That was your bizarre theory last summer seekingalpha.com/artic...
How embarrassing for you!!! And even more ridiculous: you even wanted to suggest the NY fire department was helping Bush to conceal the truth!!
No one stopping NG usage, and there is no conspiracy this time either. Quite the contrary, people like T Boone Pickens have been pushing NG in vehicles for years. Firms like UPS and FedEx (whose trucks always return to base at the end of the night and thus don't need to worry about a NG station being available) have converted parts of their fleets to use NG.
All have found that NG is not economical-- there is a **SMALL** cost savings, but it is too small to pay for all the added expenses during the expected life of the vehicle. In places where NG has to be brought in (ie there is not a NG pipe to supply the gas) -- NG vehicles cost more than gasoline.
NG vehicles are only economical for short burst / occasional use applications.
We don't need immature pie-in-the-sky conspiracy theorists like yourself figuring out new ways to waste taxpayer money. Congress does fine on its own.
Stay Away from U.S. Treasuries - Invest in Energy Stocks [View article]
America Needs a Natural Gas Transportation Infrastructure [View article]
The reason this country doesn't have a better energy policy is because people like George Bush and yourself are involved in the debate. You can protest all you want, but you and he are EXACTLY alike
America Needs a Natural Gas Transportation Infrastructure [View article]
The shortfall in NG production currently gets solved by NG imports from Canada. Canada has loads of NG, a stable government, and at least post War of 1812 they have been our allies.
The gotcha is that the Canadian government has dramatically increased taxes on energy production (both crude and NG). This is needed to pay for all the "free" healthcare they have in Canada. The US already subsidizes all the pharmaceutical drugs in Canada (we pay 100% of the research costs, plus part of the production costs for Canadian drugs) -- so I guess Fitz wants the US taxpayer to pay for the rest of Canada's costs?
Of course, he also wants to destroy the water tables out west with lots of shale oil drilling. With less potable water to go around, we don't need to worry about our health
America Needs a Natural Gas Transportation Infrastructure [View article]
Of course, taxpayers will end up footing the bill to actually make this pie-in-the-sky nonsense "work".
Fitz complains about Bush constantly -- and we have all heard about the lady that doth complain too much. Fitz has WAY more in common with Bush than he is willing to admit
America Needs a Natural Gas Transportation Infrastructure [View article]
seekingalpha.com/artic...
How embarrassing for you!!! And even more ridiculous: you even wanted to suggest the NY fire department was helping Bush to conceal the truth!!
No one stopping NG usage, and there is no conspiracy this time either. Quite the contrary, people like T Boone Pickens have been pushing NG in vehicles for years. Firms like UPS and FedEx (whose trucks always return to base at the end of the night and thus don't need to worry about a NG station being available) have converted parts of their fleets to use NG.
All have found that NG is not economical-- there is a **SMALL** cost savings, but it is too small to pay for all the added expenses during the expected life of the vehicle. In places where NG has to be brought in (ie there is not a NG pipe to supply the gas) -- NG vehicles cost more than gasoline.
NG vehicles are only economical for short burst / occasional use applications.
We don't need immature pie-in-the-sky conspiracy theorists like yourself figuring out new ways to waste taxpayer money. Congress does fine on its own.
America Needs a Natural Gas Transportation Infrastructure [View article]