Seeking Alpha

oldlures1 » Comments » C

  • Citi's Flip-Flop on Mortgage Cramdowns: A Really Bad Idea [View article]
    Tom, I agree with you. The underlying basis is, as you said, that "A loan, recall, is a contract, willingly entered into between a lender and a borrower." Sure, some folks were taken advantage of, as has been the case for decades (and not just in banking), but they are the exception; few and far between, not the norm.
    It is disheartening and disappointing (though not surprising) that many of the comments reflect/support a lack of culpability on the part of the borrower/homeowner. Sadly, it is the prevelance of such mentality, I believe, that exacerbates many of the issues facing us today and undermines progress going forward.
    Keep it up - I like the way you think!
    Jan 13 17:30 pm |Rating: +1 -1 |Link to Comment
  • Ugly [View article]
    I said it once, and I 'll say it again, I believe that the following steps would eliminate half (at least!) of the volitility in the market today:
    1) reinstate the uptick rule
    (it worked as intended since 1929, but some well-lobbied SEC knuckleheads erased it last year).
    2) aggressively enforce the prohibition of "naked" short selling
    (you should never be allowed to short stocks that don't exist - can you say "fraud"?)
    3) disallow the purchase of CDS/credit default swaps by investors who do NOT have an insurable interest in the company
    (I can't purchase hazard insurance on your home; that's illegal, so why should it be okay to buy default insurance in a company of which I have NO insurance interest? It shouldn't!)

    If the current market was a bucking bronco, hedge funds would be the rider, and they'd be well past 8-second bell....with no grips....holding a trophy in one hand and a big bag-o-money in the other....just hoping this "ride" will go on forever!
    Nov 20 18:19 pm |Rating: +1 0 |Link to Comment
  • Is Citigroup Failing? [View article]
    The falling share price is NOT a reflection of failed fundamentals, nor it is a reflection of a "problem". The contrary, it is purely a reflection of bear raiding. Elimination of the uptick rule, coupled with regulated naked shorting and the dubious incentivizing of CDS's (i.e. I can buy insurance in something of which I own NO insurable interest), has produce an environment for unethical practice and bear raiding, not to mention provided the tools by with the former is propogated.

    Citi's losses, for the most part, are paper...not cash. The securities on their books are not worthless, but rather not tradable in the current environment (on that note, what is?! Basically, nothing that doesn't start with "T"). So FASB makes them write the assets down on their books.....but the true intrinsic value hasn't dropped that much.

    I could be wrong, and only time will tell, but I don't believe for a second that the true book value of Citigroup is reflected in its current stock price. I think it has been tremendously oversold. [Yes, I am long Citi....currently VERY LONG].

    You want to solve the ills of the stock market? Here's a few starters:
    1) reinstate the uptick rule
    (it worked as intended since 1929, but some well-lobbied SEC knuckleheads erased it last year).
    2) aggressively enforce the prohibition of "naked" short selling
    (you should never be allowed to short stocks that don't exist - can you say "fraud"?)
    3) disallow the purchase of CDS/credit default swaps by investors who do NOT have an insurable interest in the company
    (I can't purchase hazard insurance on your home; that's illegal, so why should it be okay to buy default insurance in a company of which I have NO insurance interest? It shouldn't!)
    Nov 20 18:12 pm |Rating: +1 0 |Link to Comment
  • Who's Buying Financials? [View article]
    Time and time again your articles are gloom-n-doom, everybody is wrong and I am right, blah, blah, blah. Personally, I think you've fallen under the spell of the magical flute of various pied pipers; Ackman being one of the most prominent.
    I'm sorry, but going forward, I think I'll just skip over your blogs. They're just not worth the read.
    Aug 17 10:23 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Everything Financial Rolls Over: Is a Bounce Likely? [View article]
    I've never been much of a chart-follower, but it's food-for-thought. Thanks for providing.
    Jun 27 16:51 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • The Current Market Atmosphere: Easy Money Hard to Come by [View article]
    I'm with Sophisse. Can't speak for everyone, but I think it'd do me a world of good to disconnect for a while; seperate from the "noise", and clear my head. Too much info - my circuits are about to short.
    Jun 25 18:58 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • The End of the Monoline Bond Insurance Business [View article]
    At a minimum, it's premature. In a broader sense, it's unsubstantiated propaganda. I regret that I expended time reading it.
    Jun 23 11:43 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Bernanke's Statements: Blatant Lies or Wishful Thinking? [View article]
    More chicken little rhetoric. Gre-e-e-a-t.
    Moving on now...
    Jun 14 08:01 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
More on C by oldlures1
Comments by Ticker
oldlures1's
Comments Stats
74 comments
Rating: 6 (10 - 4 )