<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>pollyserial's Comments</title>
    <description>pollyserial's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/1480391/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>What Is The Federal Reserve's 'Rat' Trying To Tell You?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1426401/comments?source=feed#comment-18892881</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18892881</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Me either.  Still short (partial position) from near yesterday's high.  Continue to hope that I will be rewarded with a move near 1600.  Small position, will fold if market bluffs higher again.  Mostly in cash.  Looks like fed commentators are fairly bullish though, Plosser is the one hawk and he sees no bubbles.  LOL!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 09:26:45 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Me either.  Still short (partial position) from near yesterday's high.  Continue to hope that I will be rewarded with a move near 1600.  Small position, will fold if market bluffs higher again.  Mostly in cash.  Looks like fed commentators are fairly bullish though, Plosser is the one hawk and he sees no bubbles.  LOL!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Clarity And The S&amp;P 500</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1438341/comments?source=feed#comment-18872751</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18872751</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I don't know that it's fair to blame the fed for the 3:00 express.  I'd put it on the shoulders of the short sellers, and the algos betting that at some point the envy trade will arrive, and the 'cash on the sidelines' will rotate into equities, particularly as gold and bonds are shoe-horned down.<br/><br/>I'm entirely with you on the fundamentals, though, and just wish I could stop paying attention to them and get fully invested instead of staying almost fully in cash!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 18:54:09 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I don't know that it's fair to blame the fed for the 3:00 express.  I'd put it on the shoulders of the short sellers, and the algos betting that at some point the envy trade will arrive, and the 'cash on the sidelines' will rotate into equities, particularly as gold and bonds are shoe-horned down.<br/><br/>I'm entirely with you on the fundamentals, though, and just wish I could stop paying attention to them and get fully invested instead of staying almost fully in cash!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Is The Federal Reserve's 'Rat' Trying To Tell You?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1426401/comments?source=feed#comment-18871991</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18871991</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It would be rather amusing and par for the course if they publish a report on Tuesday citing the 'cheapness' of stocks and then jawbone them cheaper on Thursday.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 18:32:45 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It would be rather amusing and par for the course if they publish a report on Tuesday citing the 'cheapness' of stocks and then jawbone them cheaper on Thursday.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Trulia's New 'Bubble Watch' Nudges California And Texas Housing Into Overvalued Territory</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1437491/comments?source=feed#comment-18866861</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18866861</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I don't think they were talking about legacy rent-controlled rents....]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 16:34:33 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I don't think they were talking about legacy rent-controlled rents....]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple (AAPL -4.2%) roundup: Tiger Global joined the unrelated Tiger Management in selling Apple shares in Q1, lowering its stake to 260K shares from a prior 1.05M (13F). 2) According to the iRumor mill's latest updates, the retina iPad Mini will have the same resolution (2048x1536) and processor (A6X) as the retina 4th-gen iPad; the iPhone 5S will replace the tradition home button with a touch-sensitive sapphire button (a positive for GTAT); and the iPhone 5S will have an improved camera to go with a fingerprint sensor. 3) The DOJ accuses Apple of being the ring-master in an e-book price-fixing scheme (previous); Apple calls the accusation "absurd." 4) Joe Weisenthal observes Apple's price movements have correlated some with gold's.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1027611?source=feed#comment-18865301</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18865301</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Change the headline to 'not even crumbling apple can take the steam out of this rally'.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 16:02:58 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Change the headline to 'not even crumbling apple can take the steam out of this rally'.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Is The Federal Reserve's 'Rat' Trying To Tell You?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1426401/comments?source=feed#comment-18858781</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18858781</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[They've painted themselves into a bit of a corner: markets front-running stimulus, economy not improving.  Surprise, surprise.  Who would have known that wall street would be better at playing poker than the fed?  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 13:56:41 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[They've painted themselves into a bit of a corner: markets front-running stimulus, economy not improving.  Surprise, surprise.  Who would have known that wall street would be better at playing poker than the fed?  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Is The Federal Reserve's 'Rat' Trying To Tell You?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1426401/comments?source=feed#comment-18854811</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18854811</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Indeed.  I'm a little distressed that I took my gold short off.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 12:36:59 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Indeed.  I'm a little distressed that I took my gold short off.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>S&amp;P Target 2000: Air Pocket Ahead - Part IV</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1432471/comments?source=feed#comment-18816131</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18816131</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[so this is what the 'euphoria' phase looks like. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 13:18:33 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[so this is what the 'euphoria' phase looks like. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Is The Federal Reserve's 'Rat' Trying To Tell You?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1426401/comments?source=feed#comment-18815431</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18815431</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[That's what they'd like you to believe, that's for sure.  <br/><br/>Your timeframe is pretty short there.  The rest of the week may see some risk off IMO, the fed's buying schedule is lighter.  <br/><br/>But those with serious skin in the game will wait to see if the fed blinks.  If and when they do, we'll know how the market will deal with the end of QE, and not before.  You're not going to calm down a raging bull with half-baked rumors, that much is now obvious.  Now it's the fed's move.<br/><br/>And, btw, not sure what you mean exactly by 'market' but bonds and gold sure seem to care.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 13:00:17 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[That's what they'd like you to believe, that's for sure.  <br/><br/>Your timeframe is pretty short there.  The rest of the week may see some risk off IMO, the fed's buying schedule is lighter.  <br/><br/>But those with serious skin in the game will wait to see if the fed blinks.  If and when they do, we'll know how the market will deal with the end of QE, and not before.  You're not going to calm down a raging bull with half-baked rumors, that much is now obvious.  Now it's the fed's move.<br/><br/>And, btw, not sure what you mean exactly by 'market' but bonds and gold sure seem to care.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Is The Federal Reserve's 'Rat' Trying To Tell You?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1426401/comments?source=feed#comment-18770951</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18770951</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Losing faith in this GLD short, fwiw.  I'm going to exit with my small gain (from 142).  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 13:38:55 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Losing faith in this GLD short, fwiw.  I'm going to exit with my small gain (from 142).  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bernanke The Washington Super-Whale, Hedge Fundies And The Widowmaker</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1427391/comments?source=feed#comment-18744301</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18744301</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Great points as always Whitehawk -- except that I'm guessing KB needs a bigger move to break even at this point?  And I'd guess that he'll get it.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 19:56:37 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Great points as always Whitehawk -- except that I'm guessing KB needs a bigger move to break even at this point?  And I'd guess that he'll get it.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Is The Federal Reserve's 'Rat' Trying To Tell You?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1426401/comments?source=feed#comment-18742161</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18742161</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I'm not counting on bonds for safety right now.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 17:40:20 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I'm not counting on bonds for safety right now.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Bernanke The Washington Super-Whale, Hedge Fundies And The Widowmaker</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1427391/comments?source=feed#comment-18736981</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18736981</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Brad, this is a great article and analysis.  Those jumping on him with fed bashing: I don't think he defended the policy or said it was a good thing, he's just pointing out the trade fundamentals here.  You can't fight the fed.  I do think shorts will see a move here, or soon, but it's going to be a big bear trap.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 13:19:20 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Brad, this is a great article and analysis.  Those jumping on him with fed bashing: I don't think he defended the policy or said it was a good thing, he's just pointing out the trade fundamentals here.  You can't fight the fed.  I do think shorts will see a move here, or soon, but it's going to be a big bear trap.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Is The Federal Reserve's 'Rat' Trying To Tell You?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1426401/comments?source=feed#comment-18723241</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18723241</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I'm with you on GLD, not so sure about AUD (on fundamental terms obviously their exposure to the commodities complex isn't encouraging but employment reports have to have them re-thinking this rate cut) and have no idea what blue gold or purple EDs are, do tell!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 22:26:22 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I'm with you on GLD, not so sure about AUD (on fundamental terms obviously their exposure to the commodities complex isn't encouraging but employment reports have to have them re-thinking this rate cut) and have no idea what blue gold or purple EDs are, do tell!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Is The Federal Reserve's 'Rat' Trying To Tell You?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1426401/comments?source=feed#comment-18723201</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18723201</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[on Friday?  in what market?  who's your broker?  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 22:24:10 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[on Friday?  in what market?  who's your broker?  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The End Of QE Won't Kill This Bull Market</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1425531/comments?source=feed#comment-18723011</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18723011</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[And this new &quot;flexible&quot; fed has just become another reason to have less exposure to the markets and the 'accompanying psychology'; because, basically, schizoid panic will now become the institutionalized foundation of the market.  And you know that as soon as we decide that QE tapering rumors aren't going to take us back to the 200 DMA at a moment's notice, well.... then they will.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 22:12:43 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[And this new &quot;flexible&quot; fed has just become another reason to have less exposure to the markets and the 'accompanying psychology'; because, basically, schizoid panic will now become the institutionalized foundation of the market.  And you know that as soon as we decide that QE tapering rumors aren't going to take us back to the 200 DMA at a moment's notice, well.... then they will.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The End Of QE Won't Kill This Bull Market</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1425531/comments?source=feed#comment-18722811</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18722811</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Good points, all.  Like you, I emphasize the 'for now'.  For now, yields are definitely on the move, and risk is well bid.  <br/><br/>I'm of course not claiming to have a crystal ball!  There are worrying signs and there are positive signs. <br/><br/>I have also noticed the recent bounce back in the commodity complex.  It doesn't seem at all decisive to me.  It seems actually to be poised on the edge of a knife right now.....and, full disclosure, I am short GLD.<br/><br/>But at this point in time I am content to largely sit in cash, trade a bit where it seems appropriate, and wait for a clearer sign on long-term direction.  My hunch, as I said, is long-term deflation, but I'm not a zealot.  Best wishes.<br/> ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 22:06:21 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Good points, all.  Like you, I emphasize the 'for now'.  For now, yields are definitely on the move, and risk is well bid.  <br/><br/>I'm of course not claiming to have a crystal ball!  There are worrying signs and there are positive signs. <br/><br/>I have also noticed the recent bounce back in the commodity complex.  It doesn't seem at all decisive to me.  It seems actually to be poised on the edge of a knife right now.....and, full disclosure, I am short GLD.<br/><br/>But at this point in time I am content to largely sit in cash, trade a bit where it seems appropriate, and wait for a clearer sign on long-term direction.  My hunch, as I said, is long-term deflation, but I'm not a zealot.  Best wishes.<br/> ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The End Of QE Won't Kill This Bull Market</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1425531/comments?source=feed#comment-18722181</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18722181</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It's an interesting point.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 21:43:12 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It's an interesting point.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Is The Federal Reserve's 'Rat' Trying To Tell You?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1426401/comments?source=feed#comment-18720181</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18720181</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[btw how did you get short SPY and IWM @ 7:30 pm on a friday?  I thought that even futures markets are closed then?  I thought long and hard about adding to my IWM short and putting on a SPY short just before 4, into the teeth of the 3:30 cocaine train, but thought better of it.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 20:29:33 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[btw how did you get short SPY and IWM @ 7:30 pm on a friday?  I thought that even futures markets are closed then?  I thought long and hard about adding to my IWM short and putting on a SPY short just before 4, into the teeth of the 3:30 cocaine train, but thought better of it.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What Is The Federal Reserve's 'Rat' Trying To Tell You?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1426401/comments?source=feed#comment-18720031</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18720031</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[LOL @ subtle.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 20:19:59 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[LOL @ subtle.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>On the surface, today's selloff in gold has all the earmarks of a dollar-related move. After all, the Dollar Index has risen nearly 2% over the past two days. Couple that with the standard Friday jitters, its only natural for support levels to be breached today. However, Oppenheimer's chief market technician Carter Worth says today's action all part of a bigger technical move. "A multi-year bull market has transitioned to a bear market," Worth says, and "the backing and filling of late is the normal setup for the next leg down."</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1019801?source=feed#comment-18719951</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18719951</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[What's your time-frame and target Whitehawk?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 20:16:48 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[What's your time-frame and target Whitehawk?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The End Of QE Won't Kill This Bull Market</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1425531/comments?source=feed#comment-18719921</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18719921</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Your point about the economy is a bit confusing.  If a recovery hasn't even started, then why are stock prices up 100% --  if not because of QE-related financial market distortions?  <br/><br/>My fundamental opinion is that QE has tremendous effect on the markets but there is little flow-through to the 'real' world of inputs and wages and etc.<br/><br/>And yes I agree, if QE ends because the economy is recovering, we are going to the moon.  In my opinion, however, QE will end/taper not because the economy is recovering but rather because it becomes increasingly obvious that QE is in fact threatening if not outright stalling the recovery, by encouraging companies to add to their bottom line using financial shenanigans and buybacks, instead of actually growing their businesses and adding to employment.  <br/><br/>And, I'm not sure I understand why you think ADP, PAYX and insurers will benefit moving forward: I guess you're firmly in the camp of an inflationary, higher growth future?  I hope you're right, of course, but I just don't see it.  At any rate thanks as always for an informative viewpoint and best wishes.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 20:14:13 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Your point about the economy is a bit confusing.  If a recovery hasn't even started, then why are stock prices up 100% --  if not because of QE-related financial market distortions?  <br/><br/>My fundamental opinion is that QE has tremendous effect on the markets but there is little flow-through to the 'real' world of inputs and wages and etc.<br/><br/>And yes I agree, if QE ends because the economy is recovering, we are going to the moon.  In my opinion, however, QE will end/taper not because the economy is recovering but rather because it becomes increasingly obvious that QE is in fact threatening if not outright stalling the recovery, by encouraging companies to add to their bottom line using financial shenanigans and buybacks, instead of actually growing their businesses and adding to employment.  <br/><br/>And, I'm not sure I understand why you think ADP, PAYX and insurers will benefit moving forward: I guess you're firmly in the camp of an inflationary, higher growth future?  I hope you're right, of course, but I just don't see it.  At any rate thanks as always for an informative viewpoint and best wishes.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Fed and Treasury are examining the extent to which Bloomberg terminal usage by top officials was tracked by Bloomberg journalists. Bloomberg reporters were reportedly using terminal login data "very openly" to determine when traders were suspended or let go during the London Whale situation. Another report says Bloomberg employees accessed a transcript of a call of former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan to the company's help desk.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/1019921?source=feed#comment-18719621</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18719621</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA['Fed and Treasury are examining the extent to which Bloomberg news is or is not aware of exactly what 'other' assets they may have been buying under OMO.']]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 19:49:42 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA['Fed and Treasury are examining the extent to which Bloomberg news is or is not aware of exactly what 'other' assets they may have been buying under OMO.']]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Unraveling The VXX Roll Yield Riddle</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1421431/comments?source=feed#comment-18718781</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18718781</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@steadyO: the idea being, that the deep ITM put covers you in case there's a regime change, yeah?  but you're well-screwed if we get a month long selloff, no?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 18:52:40 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@steadyO: the idea being, that the deep ITM put covers you in case there's a regime change, yeah?  but you're well-screwed if we get a month long selloff, no?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Unraveling The VXX Roll Yield Riddle</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1421431/comments?source=feed#comment-18718751</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18718751</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[swashplate: I love and try to remember the first line of that movie 'Rounders': 'if you don't know who the sucker is at the table....it's probably you.'  Doesn't it seem like, if the money down there was really free money, some one of those reasonably intelligent and very hungry sharks in the water would have grabbed it by now?<br/><br/>The chart on SVXY goes back all of two years, which have been some of the best times in history to sell vol.  If you do wade in to waters that you don't thoroughly understand, just do it small enough so that you can feel ok about giving money away if it goes down that way.  Best wishes.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 18:49:49 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[swashplate: I love and try to remember the first line of that movie 'Rounders': 'if you don't know who the sucker is at the table....it's probably you.'  Doesn't it seem like, if the money down there was really free money, some one of those reasonably intelligent and very hungry sharks in the water would have grabbed it by now?<br/><br/>The chart on SVXY goes back all of two years, which have been some of the best times in history to sell vol.  If you do wade in to waters that you don't thoroughly understand, just do it small enough so that you can feel ok about giving money away if it goes down that way.  Best wishes.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Unraveling The VXX Roll Yield Riddle</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1421431/comments?source=feed#comment-18718631</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18718631</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[@ jpwillia thanks for clarifying and with greatest respect I think Andrew's approach makes more sense on every level.  You limit your profit using spreads but you also limit your downside.  BTW I highly recommend reading Taleb's 'Fooled By Randomness' if you're going to be a derivatives trader, which is what you're doing.  It has many good examples of a few of the many ways people can utterly blow up their accounts, and lives, by not having protection as sellers in derivatives markets.  Best of luck!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 18:42:01 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[@ jpwillia thanks for clarifying and with greatest respect I think Andrew's approach makes more sense on every level.  You limit your profit using spreads but you also limit your downside.  BTW I highly recommend reading Taleb's 'Fooled By Randomness' if you're going to be a derivatives trader, which is what you're doing.  It has many good examples of a few of the many ways people can utterly blow up their accounts, and lives, by not having protection as sellers in derivatives markets.  Best of luck!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Unraveling The VXX Roll Yield Riddle</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1421431/comments?source=feed#comment-18718451</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18718451</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You're right of course, that was silly and unfair of me.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 18:31:33 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You're right of course, that was silly and unfair of me.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Unraveling The VXX Roll Yield Riddle</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1421431/comments?source=feed#comment-18718431</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18718431</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Totally agree on options -- and hedged positions using options IMO, to further reduce the danger.  Though being long a small amount of the underlying when the underlying is as cheap as UVXY is right now, is more or less the same thing as an option.<br/><br/>And, I was talking about mental stops.  I never put stops in any more......but, this idea that you just sell vol and wait for it to go your way, all-in, strikes me as dangerous.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 18:30:30 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Totally agree on options -- and hedged positions using options IMO, to further reduce the danger.  Though being long a small amount of the underlying when the underlying is as cheap as UVXY is right now, is more or less the same thing as an option.<br/><br/>And, I was talking about mental stops.  I never put stops in any more......but, this idea that you just sell vol and wait for it to go your way, all-in, strikes me as dangerous.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The End Of QE Won't Kill This Bull Market</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1425531/comments?source=feed#comment-18718321</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18718321</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[And Alan, (with all due respect) I think that at the very least you should consider the possibility that, as the big money unwinds treasuries (hedges) they will be perhaps be moved to unwind some portion of their notional exposure to risk.  Margin rates will no doubt rise and it seems to me that levels of margin must also decline.  ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 18:25:50 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[And Alan, (with all due respect) I think that at the very least you should consider the possibility that, as the big money unwinds treasuries (hedges) they will be perhaps be moved to unwind some portion of their notional exposure to risk.  Margin rates will no doubt rise and it seems to me that levels of margin must also decline.  ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The End Of QE Won't Kill This Bull Market</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1425531/comments?source=feed#comment-18718161</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18718161</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[(.......or maybe w/ regard to rates you're just talking about the effect of OMO on rates.....which have obviously already started moving and will no doubt experience some extreme volatility in the near term)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 18:20:12 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[(.......or maybe w/ regard to rates you're just talking about the effect of OMO on rates.....which have obviously already started moving and will no doubt experience some extreme volatility in the near term)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
