Your explanation is plausible only to the extent the TED spread is a trustworthy number. They've already been caught blatantly lying about LIBOR once, so why assume it's trustworthy now? (especially with so much on the line.)
IMO it's more likely LIBOR is (still) a lie and things aren't really as "good" as they seem. Remember, there's no way to independently verify the LIBOR calculation... it's a "trust me, I'm really telling you the truth" number. Sorry guys, I don't trust you.
-
Your explanation is plausible only to the extent the TED spread is a trustworthy number. They've already been caught blatantly lying about LIBOR once, so why assume it's trustworthy now? (especially with so much on the line.)
Nov 22 08:20 am
|Rating:
+1
0
All Comments by RDKaser »This Is Not Financial Meltdown [View article]
IMO it's more likely LIBOR is (still) a lie and things aren't really as "good" as they seem. Remember, there's no way to independently verify the LIBOR calculation... it's a "trust me, I'm really telling you the truth" number. Sorry guys, I don't trust you.
Take ALL data like this with a grain of salt.