Seeking Alpha

fjd10595 » Comments » GDX

  • Wednesday Outlook: How Far Can Bulls Take It? [View article]
    Good job.
    Mar 19 07:56 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Thursday Outlook: Metals, Commodities, International [View article]
    I say overpriced China drops from her, in lockstep with the US market. Our economy is slowing, and so is theirs. I bought the inverse ETF at a 20% discount a couple of days ago when China rallied. We will see.
    Mar 13 07:46 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Thursday Outlook: The Inflation Con Game [View article]
    The veto is already the law of the land and can be used by one person. To my knowledge it has been the case since the founding of this nation. I am saying that the president should use it to contain the will of the people as exercised through congress when their are obvious excesses. But this president doesn't contain excesses, he adds to them. The invasion of Iraq was reckless, poorly planned and based on fraudulent data- the president's people telling him what he wanted to hear. It is well understood that this is the most closed administration in history, they force out people that don't see it their way, Paul O’Neill, Christy Whitman, Powell, and promote people that are incompetent or worse, but see it their way, Rumsfeld, Rice, Rove. They are a disgrace to our children who will inherit the problems that they have caused or added to. Any person who believes that George Bush has administered this country properly has to be a fool.
    Feb 22 14:41 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Thursday Outlook: The Inflation Con Game [View article]
    To 86999, you did not give us any solution, yes, the veto is needed, because we know that the masses in Congress do not work collectively to achieve the best ends for the future, they seek to please the crybaby children in their districts with more entitlements. We need a person in the White House that is very intelligent, very discerning, and who is more concerned with the future than the masses in Congress. We need a person who can lead the masses in Congress to proper policies. You are correct to be worried about tyranny. It is a fine line between having a US president who leads us into the future and having a dictator/ president like Putin. Baby Bush has failed on all accounts. An earlier post said that his legacy will be "saving us from terror". Yes, he was right to hit the terrorists and the Taliban, then he recklessly invaded Iraq on his false data and increased terrorism. Some of us were afraid that the American people were electing a fool, and he proved us right. Not only is he a fool, he is reckless, driving the country over a cliff, denying science, pandering to extremist christians.
    Feb 22 09:15 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Thursday Outlook: The Inflation Con Game [View article]
    You guys make me laugh, "why does bush get the blame", "clinton had a republican congress", remember the Bush quote on the big drug entitlement' "get the bill on my desk so I can sign it". He wanted it, he got it, he didn't fund it, he gave the bill to our kids. Period. The war, the same thing. Clinton did not ask for big entitlement spending like bush has. Ever hear of the term "veto". Bush didn't use if for four years. Reading comments like these, I see why the country is going down the drain if this is a sampling of what the public believes. What a shame for our kids.
    Feb 22 08:10 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Thursday Outlook: The Inflation Con Game [View article]
    "Clinton and company" may have changed the formula, as you state, but please, some equal time. At least they held the line on spending. "Bush and company" have wrecked this country ten times over. The Bush legacy is to turn over the bill for today's problems to our kids. It is complete recklessness, and not enough is written about it.
    Feb 21 08:14 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
More on GDX by fjd10595
fjd10595's
Comments Stats
86 comments
Rating: 27 (102 - 75 )