Cougar Biotechnology: Stalking Prostate Cancer [View article]
Bryan, you say:
“Both treatments Dendreon's and Cougar's fall short, time to progression for Provenge and no survival statistics for abiraterone.”
Did Provenge really miss ‘time to progression?’
The p value for the primary endpoint of cancer progression was p=0.052, barely missing the p=0.050 threshold. For Howard Scher and Maha Hussain, this narrow miss was blown up to be an utter failure. They said that because the p value did not reach 0.050, then all additional data (including survival) should be discarded. Basically, their position was that because the odds of being successful in progression were only 94.8% and not 95.0%, there was no correlation between the two metrics and the 99.0% survival odds should be thrown in the trash.
And remember, the overall survival p value in 9901 was 0.01, easily beating the p=0.05 threshold. This goes to the crux of the anger of the Provenge advocates. Statistical significance on survival is the "gold standard" by which the FDA judges all oncology treatments, and Provenge met it with flying colors in the 9901 trial.
-
Bryan, you say:
Jul 03 01:14 am
|Rating:
+1
0
All Comments by kyoto27 »Cougar Biotechnology: Stalking Prostate Cancer [View article]
“Both treatments Dendreon's and Cougar's fall short, time to progression for Provenge and no survival statistics for abiraterone.”
Did Provenge really miss ‘time to progression?’
The p value for the primary endpoint of cancer progression was p=0.052, barely missing the p=0.050 threshold. For Howard Scher and Maha Hussain, this narrow miss was blown up to be an utter failure. They said that because the p value did not reach 0.050, then all additional data (including survival) should be discarded. Basically, their position was that because the odds of being successful in progression were only 94.8% and not 95.0%, there was no correlation between the two metrics and the 99.0% survival odds should be thrown in the trash.
And remember, the overall survival p value in 9901 was 0.01, easily beating the p=0.05 threshold. This goes to the crux of the anger of the Provenge advocates. Statistical significance on survival is the "gold standard" by which the FDA judges all oncology treatments, and Provenge met it with flying colors in the 9901 trial.