As Bank Industry Analysts Lose Jobs, Serious Blogs Take the Forefront [View article]
Thanks Reggie, I will. I think you've got another paid subscriber! You finally got me. Maybe you can tell me how stupid I am for being an ETFC long in this environment. argh.
As Bank Industry Analysts Lose Jobs, Serious Blogs Take the Forefront [View article]
Reggie, I thought you were done wth Seeking Alpa man? Your subscriber part of your blog is kind of whack, I keep trying to log in to no avail. My email is prescient11@yahoo.com if you can help.
For those who don't know Reggie he's the best around, GGP is his crown jewel. He also called HIG and the other insurers and the downfall of the IBs. His analysis is the best. I shouldn't have closed my short on GGP in the $20s, and you shouldn't have closed it in the teens,wow!
Congrats on all the success man, you've earned it.
The Weakness of the Treasury's New Bailout Plan [View article]
Felix, the resident genius with "concerns". Really, man, why don't you just own up to it. No plan would be perfect. And they're taking preferred shares so they do not dilute the common. While it's not as much oversight as one would like, what do you expect them to do, FORCE healthy banks to accept this capitalization and then FORCE them to accept new board members, someone probably as dense and bureaucratic as yourself.
Listen, despite your constant cabal-like effort to communicate "concerns" about everything, this is the government giving you a big middle finger, saying, listen skippy, we, the Euros, everyone is backing our banks and that's it. So move along Felix, just move along man. You've been out of your league for some time.
The financial system will not fall, it appears, based on these broad guarantees, and I think the governments of the first-world nations should be applauded for their efforts in this regard. Let's just hope the lesson has been learned and once the bleeding is stopped they fix the disease.
Hank Paulson: Smartest Man in the Room [View article]
Do only doom and gloom freaks post here. I will say that I think Paulson has an idea of what this is. Do you morons really think that he and his lieutenants, who have been working for 24 hours straight for months, do not understand the problems.
Yes, all you are geniuses and Paulson knows nothing. The author may be a little too much in favor of Hank, but it's clear that Paulson has some plan. A lot better than what I've heard from the uber-bears. Most of which I see post again and again on these articles with nothing ever to say.
Worrying About Large-Deposit Bank Runs [View article]
Well well well Felix, I see that these SOBs are being investigated for aggressive short selling and CDS manipulation. Care to apologize to Dear John Thain now, or will you never own up to your own ignorance and mistakes.
The $300B, obviously comes from the taxpayer, but it will be in the form of repackaged loans with an FHA guarantee.
Lender cuts the loan principal to 90%, issues a new FHA backed mortgage, and then can sell it in the market. Should be as liquid as a T-bill. Thus, the cash gets directly to where we desperately need it, these lenders' balance sheets. I think it will have a tremendous effect, especially with some of the biggies.
Does this loser sit up at night thinking of what clever titles he can put out there that will grab attention? You got me, I clicked the link only to see your smug stupid face come up first thing.
Listen up skippy and listen up good, you may think you know what you're talking about, but in reality you fail to realize what's happened. Think for once damnit. Think beyond your limited capacity and the numbers you cherish. Are you stupid enough to really believe that the government is going to want to foot the bill for all the likely failures if what you profess is to take place. Of course they won't. That's why the government just injected $300B of liquidity into the banking system a la the housing bill.
Game, set and match. Go look for the sky to fall, as we're not there yet. But the smugness is really too much.
Bearfund, I agree, I'm at a loss on WFC as well. Stock may even be overvalued, who knows there.
What I do know, however, is that they are not falling off a cliff and the rumors of their death had been very exaggerated.
This leads to my hypothesis that negative home values are not a direct correlation, or even a strong correlation, between the very large loss estimates the author cites and current forecasts.
There will be more losses, but the end is not at hand. If you had bothered to review WFC's quarterly release, even accounting for their 180 day change on the chargeoff for the HELOCs, they are making money.
Imho, where uber-bears make the greatest mistake is that they believe people have a stop-loss on their house. This is not the case. Negative equity only becomes a factor when one cannot or chooses not to make the payment on the house. Thank God moving is such a pain.
More losses are likely, and many investment banks holding leveraged instruments are likely holding their losses. Whether it's a trillion, or a few more hundred billion, I don't know.
The housing rescue bill is more important than many, many, realize. GS estimated that US banks will have to raise $65B of capital. The housing bill just injected $300B onto banks balance sheets, and this should affect some downstream CDOs and other instruments as well.
Of the much-maligned baseball analogy, in my view we are likely in the bottom of the seventh inning.
The world is not ending, financials will still be around. Take a hard look at WFC's earnings release, and then you will know why it went up 22% in one day and much higher in the days that followed.
Guess what, with all the dire predictions they were still making money. Even if you put all their home equity losses on the books, that is still the case. Enjoy the summer, take the kids to the lake.
Explain what you mean by risk factors and I'll let you know if I agree or disagree. I vehemently disagree about the "massive dilution" you reference, by the way.
As Bank Industry Analysts Lose Jobs, Serious Blogs Take the Forefront [View article]
As Bank Industry Analysts Lose Jobs, Serious Blogs Take the Forefront [View article]
For those who don't know Reggie he's the best around, GGP is his crown jewel. He also called HIG and the other insurers and the downfall of the IBs. His analysis is the best. I shouldn't have closed my short on GGP in the $20s, and you shouldn't have closed it in the teens,wow!
Congrats on all the success man, you've earned it.
Citi's Desperate Straits [View article]
Of course, I hope the sarcasm comes through clear enough as there is no analysis in this piece. Why do you write such tripe?
Bigger is Not Better in Banking [View article]
The Weakness of the Treasury's New Bailout Plan [View article]
Listen, despite your constant cabal-like effort to communicate "concerns" about everything, this is the government giving you a big middle finger, saying, listen skippy, we, the Euros, everyone is backing our banks and that's it. So move along Felix, just move along man. You've been out of your league for some time.
The financial system will not fall, it appears, based on these broad guarantees, and I think the governments of the first-world nations should be applauded for their efforts in this regard. Let's just hope the lesson has been learned and once the bleeding is stopped they fix the disease.
Hank Paulson: Smartest Man in the Room [View article]
Yes, all you are geniuses and Paulson knows nothing. The author may be a little too much in favor of Hank, but it's clear that Paulson has some plan. A lot better than what I've heard from the uber-bears. Most of which I see post again and again on these articles with nothing ever to say.
Worrying About Large-Deposit Bank Runs [View article]
Which Banks Will Survive? [View article]
The $300B, obviously comes from the taxpayer, but it will be in the form of repackaged loans with an FHA guarantee.
Lender cuts the loan principal to 90%, issues a new FHA backed mortgage, and then can sell it in the market. Should be as liquid as a T-bill. Thus, the cash gets directly to where we desperately need it, these lenders' balance sheets. I think it will have a tremendous effect, especially with some of the biggies.
Which Banks Will Survive? [View article]
Can you not answer the question/point that I raised? If not, then why bother to respond. $300B is on its way. Now, do you have a point?
Which Banks Will Survive? [View article]
where's the lack of analysis, damnit. sorry user if that offends you.
I made a point regarding the housing bill. Where's your counterpoint?
Thanks so much.
Which Banks Will Survive? [View article]
Which Banks Will Survive? [View article]
Listen up skippy and listen up good, you may think you know what you're talking about, but in reality you fail to realize what's happened. Think for once damnit. Think beyond your limited capacity and the numbers you cherish. Are you stupid enough to really believe that the government is going to want to foot the bill for all the likely failures if what you profess is to take place. Of course they won't. That's why the government just injected $300B of liquidity into the banking system a la the housing bill.
Game, set and match. Go look for the sky to fall, as we're not there yet. But the smugness is really too much.
Is the U.S. Banking System Safe? [View article]
What I do know, however, is that they are not falling off a cliff and the rumors of their death had been very exaggerated.
This leads to my hypothesis that negative home values are not a direct correlation, or even a strong correlation, between the very large loss estimates the author cites and current forecasts.
we'll see how the construction loans go.
Is the U.S. Banking System Safe? [View article]
Imho, where uber-bears make the greatest mistake is that they believe people have a stop-loss on their house. This is not the case. Negative equity only becomes a factor when one cannot or chooses not to make the payment on the house. Thank God moving is such a pain.
More losses are likely, and many investment banks holding leveraged instruments are likely holding their losses. Whether it's a trillion, or a few more hundred billion, I don't know.
The housing rescue bill is more important than many, many, realize. GS estimated that US banks will have to raise $65B of capital. The housing bill just injected $300B onto banks balance sheets, and this should affect some downstream CDOs and other instruments as well.
Of the much-maligned baseball analogy, in my view we are likely in the bottom of the seventh inning.
The world is not ending, financials will still be around. Take a hard look at WFC's earnings release, and then you will know why it went up 22% in one day and much higher in the days that followed.
Guess what, with all the dire predictions they were still making money. Even if you put all their home equity losses on the books, that is still the case. Enjoy the summer, take the kids to the lake.
Metrics, Mortgages and Analysts [View article]
Explain what you mean by risk factors and I'll let you know if I agree or disagree. I vehemently disagree about the "massive dilution" you reference, by the way.