China: Holiday Thoughts on Misunderstanding Data [View article]
Thanks for all the great comments. The main points I tried to make in the first part of my piece were: 1) As most of the comments implicitly ackowledge it is not very useful to assume that there is such a thing as "Chinese opinion" when in fact this is a very complex country undergoing huge social transformation and, not surprisingly, there is a very wide range of views including some very mixed feelings about the process of change. Chinese attitudes to China are at least as nuanced and conflicted as American attitudes to the US are, and the view of young people as being dominated by the fen qing (sorry for the typo) is no more accurate than to assume all young Austrians are neo-Nazis just because the neo-Nazis are more visible in the headlines. 2) This complexity and distrust has political and economic implications.
And AWJ, I am not disparaging young people from elite colleges (nor are all my young friends from elite colleges -- I actually deal with a pretty wide group of people here). At Beida, Tsinghua, Renda, Zheda, Fudan and several of the other elite schools at which I taught and lectured I have met lots of very impressive students who have a great deal of idealism and are eager to see Chinese advance in a wide variety of areas, but there is no point assuming that elite students have any more objective view than students from what you unfairly call the "trash" schools. In fact Beida students know that, one way or the otjher, their prospects for advancing in China or going abroad (and all six of the people I spoke to Sunday night said they would not hesitate for a second to emigrate if they could, but it was too difficult for them to do so) are fairly good, and this cannot help but affect their feelings and observations.
By the way I agree with your dismay about Bjork's silly and self-interested behavior. If you are Modern Sky come see me at the Maybe Mars booth, where i spend a lot of time.
The second part of my peice was, I guess, a warning about my own perspectives. I am no more objective than anyone else, but my many years experience in other developing countries leaves me very wary of the claim that economic processes are different in China. I think we need to look at data in China and understand that even when the data is right, it can give us a view that is the opposite of reality because the system has so many moving parts and they react in sometimes contradictory ways to each other.
-
Thanks for all the great comments. The main points I tried to make in the first part of my piece were: 1) As most of the comments implicitly ackowledge it is not very useful to assume that there is such a thing as "Chinese opinion" when in fact this is a very complex country undergoing huge social transformation and, not surprisingly, there is a very wide range of views including some very mixed feelings about the process of change. Chinese attitudes to China are at least as nuanced and conflicted as American attitudes to the US are, and the view of young people as being dominated by the fen qing (sorry for the typo) is no more accurate than to assume all young Austrians are neo-Nazis just because the neo-Nazis are more visible in the headlines. 2) This complexity and distrust has political and economic implications.
Oct 01 02:48 am
|Rating:
0
0
All Comments by HeF »China: Holiday Thoughts on Misunderstanding Data [View article]
And AWJ, I am not disparaging young people from elite colleges (nor are all my young friends from elite colleges -- I actually deal with a pretty wide group of people here). At Beida, Tsinghua, Renda, Zheda, Fudan and several of the other elite schools at which I taught and lectured I have met lots of very impressive students who have a great deal of idealism and are eager to see Chinese advance in a wide variety of areas, but there is no point assuming that elite students have any more objective view than students from what you unfairly call the "trash" schools. In fact Beida students know that, one way or the otjher, their prospects for advancing in China or going abroad (and all six of the people I spoke to Sunday night said they would not hesitate for a second to emigrate if they could, but it was too difficult for them to do so) are fairly good, and this cannot help but affect their feelings and observations.
By the way I agree with your dismay about Bjork's silly and self-interested behavior. If you are Modern Sky come see me at the Maybe Mars booth, where i spend a lot of time.
The second part of my peice was, I guess, a warning about my own perspectives. I am no more objective than anyone else, but my many years experience in other developing countries leaves me very wary of the claim that economic processes are different in China. I think we need to look at data in China and understand that even when the data is right, it can give us a view that is the opposite of reality because the system has so many moving parts and they react in sometimes contradictory ways to each other.