ChristianR

4 Comments

    • ON: Mon Mar 24th 21:05 PM
      Commented on:
      Financials Likely in Dead Cat Bounce, But Fed's Now a Wildcard
      "Auction Rates Securities market which locked
      $330,000,000,000,000 in now absolutely illiquid securities."

      $330 trillion????? Please.
      View article »
    • ON: Sat Mar 8th 18:59 PM
      Commented on:
      iPhone SDK and Restrictions: Some of the Details Aren’t Great
      "I don't know anyone who would want such a feature, or a developer stupid enough to contemplate it for the mass market."

      Lots of people. Disney Mobile has such a feature on their phones that allows tracking and they seem to have a mass market for kids phones and parents who want it. There are a lot of other opportunities here too.

      A small background application (you are talking less than 1k of code) would handle a lot of the hard work and use very little battery life.
      View article »
    • ON: Sun Feb 24th 21:10 PM
      Commented on:
      A Bank Led, Bank Insurer Bailout?!
      Wachovia has stated multiple times that its monoline exposure is around $400 million. MorningStar stated last month: "Wachovia hedged away a portion of subprime and CDO exposure with monoline financial guarantors and believes it would need to take as much as $400 million in credit charges if the monoline financial guarantors were to fail. If Wachovia wrote down all of its remaining exposure and the monoline financial guarantors failed, we estimate it would take a pretax charge of $1.47 per share."

      $1.47 per share. IF the monoline guarantors were to fail.
      View article »
    • ON: Wed Feb 20th 13:27 PM
      Commented on:
      Wachovia: Lower Rates Are Working
      Let's do the math.

      Even if Wachovia had a 20% problem rate (above what is already taken into account which is already significant), 20% of 120 billion (round number) is 24 billion. When they write something off, that doesn't mean it goes to zero. It means they foreclose. Suppose these loans are 95% LTV (initial value at origination). So the 24 billion represents 25.2 billion of original value (24 billion / 0.95). If they sell at a 30% discount to their origination values in the past 3 years (since those are most likely to be the ones in trouble) that means you are talk about 17.7 billion in value (25.2 billion * 70%).

      This would put the write-off at around 7 billion. That is a catastrophic scenario and would require something of Great Depression proportions.

      Even if it did occur, 7 billion would certainly be a big hit, but WB made almost that much in 2007 which means it would be painful, but not something that would be as bad as people are fearing now.

      Just to be clear: I do not think this will happen and am only going through the exercise to make the point that even in the scenario above, it would not be the end of the world or even close for WB. It might wipe out a year's worth of profits, but companies have been through much, much worse and done fine once it was behind them.

      The perspective is way out of line here in my opinion - Todd S is right.
      View article »
Loading...
Symbols:
Authors:
Quick Links:
Contribute an Article Become a Seeking Alpha Contributor

Transcripts

More Transcripts»