Blaine

Thursday Outlook: Range-Bound Trading

I think that this article by in the April 11 issue of the NY Times sums it up for me.

According to a recent report by Amory Lovins of the Rocky Mountain Institute, if the United States had continued to conserve oil at the rate it did in the period from 1976 to 1985, it would no longer have needed Persian Gulf oil after 1985. Had we continued this wise course, we might not have had to fight the Persian Gulf war, and we would have insulated ourselves from price shocks in the international oil market. Fuel efficiency is a sound national energy policy, economic policy and foreign policy all wrapped into one. Every increase of one mile per gallon in auto fuel efficiency yields more oil than is in two Arctic National Wildlife Refuges. An improvement right now of 2.7 miles per gallon would eliminate our need for all Persian Gulf oil!

Thursday Outlook: Range-Bound Trading

The oil embargo began during the Nixon administration, which did absolutely nothing and neither did Gerald Ford's. When Jimmy Carter became president, he installed solar panels atop the White House. He also championed nuclear power. He taxed oil company profits to fund renewable energy research. He created the U.S. Department of Energy. He introduced America to ethanol. Oil imports plummeted during the Carter administration. Renewable energy research skyrocketed.

Pres. Carter submitted a 104-page energy plan to Congress with 113 specific proposals. Builders were required to use more insulation. Appliances, refrigerators in particular, became more energy-efficient. Homeowners received tax credits to heat water with solar power and the speed limit was lowered to 55 mph to conserve gasoline.

Carter boosted renewable fuel usage from 6 percent to 7 percent of the nation's energy demands. Oil used to generate electricity disappeared.

But Ronald Reagan soon began killing off many of Carter's energy initiatives. Reagan halved the Energy Department's conservation and alternative fuels budget. Spending on photovoltaic research dropped by two-thirds. Under Reagan, Energy tax credits for homeowners disappeared. Reagan rolled back fuel-efficiency standards for cars and he had the solar panels atop the White House taken down.

Today United States imports 12 million barrels of oil daily, or 60 percent of the amount consumed. Oil and gas prices are skyrocketing. The US imports twice as much oil as it did during Carter's final year in office. Ethanol, biodiesel, solar and other alternative fuels supply no more energy than they did in 1980. And the Bush administration has given no consideration to any action that would correct our growing crisis of energy.

Thursday Outlook: The Inflation Con Game

Sorry, the date on the NY Times article was February 22, 1995 - not 2008. It was written by Kenneth N. Gilpin.

Thursday Outlook: The Inflation Con Game

It is a completely false assertion that "Clinton and Company" changed the way inflation was calculated. It was factually Alan Greenspan and a grateful Republican Congress who created a shell game to slash $150 million form the Federal Deficit over five years. Greenspan suggested the change in 1995 as a way to trim cost of living adjustments to Social Security beneficiaries, other recipients of Federal benefit programs and retired Government workers.

According to the NY Times, “Mr. Greenspan's proposal was greeted enthusiastically by Republicans on Capitol Hill. He appeared to offer a way out of one of their biggest quandaries: how to cut spending on Federal entitlement programs without a specific vote that would clearly tamper with politically sacrosanct Social Security benefits. It would also allow Congress to increase tax revenues at a faster rate without requiring a political death wish: a vote to increase income taxes. …Indeed, House Speaker Newt Gingrich went so far as to threaten to withhold financing from the Bureau of Labor Statistics -- responsible for compiling the monthly consumer price report since 1919 -- unless it changed its approach. (NY Times, Feb. 22, 2008)
Truthfully, it was Speaker Gingrich and the 1990’s Republican Congress who were responsible. Does David Fry intentionally misrepresent the facts or is he just uninformed? Those who would undertake journalism at the very least have an obligation for the truth; and hyperbolic slander has no place in legitimate publications, even if they are online. One should only hope that Mr. Fry is not as cavalier with his investing advice as he is with the truth.