Managing Editor

Total Rating:
+3 / 0

129 Comments

    • Fri Jun 27th 14:07 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      The Swissie and Gold
      GMiki -

      There's no representation made here that the Swiss franc is "better" than gold.

      Rather, we observe the degree to which a currency is "pegged" to the dollar against its gold-denominated value.


      Investors dealing with international assets, including those holding foreign stocks and bonds, or mutual funds holding such assets, are, by default, in the foreign exchange market. Each time they buy an offshore stock or bond, they're selling dollars to buy francs or yen or euro, depending upon the home currency of the target security.

      Aren't they entitled to know the value they're obtaining when they make such investments?

      To say that the period cited isn't relevant because it's a "consolidation period" smacks of data mining. If we only report data that supports some preconceived notion, we have no credibility as dispassionate observers.

      If you'd followed the articles embedded link to "Translating Currencies Through Gold," you would have seen a graph and supporting data on THREE YEARS of currency/gold valuations.

      View article »
    • Thu Jun 26th 09:58 AM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Oil Inventories Report Full of Surprises
      Redbaron -

      This article is part of a weekly series of reports on oil and fuel inventories run on Hard Assets Investor (HardAssetsInvestor.com)

      There WERE comments five weeks ago. They were here: "Crude Oil Flips to Contango" (www.hardassetsinvestor...) and here: seekingalpha.com/artic..., as well as in "Crude Oil Dances To Contango," (seekingalpha.com/artic...).

      There's more reportage than analysis in these rweekly eports. Intentionally.

      On top of the numbers presented in the Energy Department status reports, HAI's articles also cite consensus forecasts from outside analysts, updates on crack spreads/refiniing margins and the values of related ETFs.

      The argument about accuracy, seems to me, a straw man.

      What "information"... is lacking from this report on oil inventories?

      View article »
    • Thu Jun 19th 12:13 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Tracking Crack Spreads
      User -

      It depends on how "short" the "short" in your term is.

      And whether or not you can go "short." Seasonally, margins are softening now. If you're especially aggressive--and some might say, foolish--you could sell the independents now.

      Or you could wait for heating oil season when retooling and maintenance operations curb production (look for that 5% margin differential ) to buy the stocks.
      View article »
    • Thu Jun 19th 11:29 AM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Tracking Crack Spreads
      ihl - Thanks for your comments.

      maximax - Thanks for yours as well.

      Your point's well-taken. Coking spreads take into account more than just two products on the output side, namely WTS, dated Brent and No. 6 fuel oil.

      Coking operations, too, are multiplying.

      The point of the article, however, was to offer a basic model for those unfamiliar with refinery operations in terms that they've likely encountered in investment articles.

      Crack spreads are discussed in investment terms more often than coking spreads.

      Investors, too, are much more likely to grab the two crack spread output prices from retail sources than the less transparent coking components.

      There are a limited set of products, too, for retail investors to use (ETFs) to capture refining margins.

      In a nutshell, this article wasn't destined for professional hedgers or industry insiders. Rather, it's an overview of a concept often encountered by, but seldom adequately explained to, retail investors.
      View article »
    • Wed Jun 18th 11:51 AM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Tracking Crack Spreads
      User -

      Not the TWO margins. The DIFFERENCE between the two margins.

      One tracks the spread between the input price and the prices of the outputs (the apprarent refining margin), the other (gross profit margin, basis the cost of goods sold) the profit represented by the per-barrel crack against the sale prices of the outputs. Gross and grosser, you might say.
      View article »
    • Wed Jun 18th 10:21 AM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      PPI: the Numbers behind the Numbers
      Thaks for your comment.

      Apparently, snarkiness doesn't translate well on the page.

      I, personally, DON'T feel reassured by the core numbers. I haven't yet found a way to live without food and energy.
      View article »
    • Tue Jun 17th 13:30 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      The Dollar, Inflation and You
      Thanks for your comment. Agreed. The move to a specie-backed currency wought be a fractious event.

      How would your new currency idea work?
      View article »
    • Thu Jun 12th 22:49 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Play Your Short Game in Gold
      GMiki -

      COMEX June gold had last settled at $894.50 when you wrote your comment. Three trading sessions later, the contract settled at $869.20.

      Some might consider a $2,530 return a nice short. At exchange minimum margins, that's a 59% gain.

      View article »
    • Thu Jun 12th 09:36 AM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Crude Report Stumps Analysts
      Jack Yetiv -

      EXACTLY! Now you know why we run the crack spread figures on Hard Assets Investor (HardAssetsInvestor.com) every week. If investors would look at the oil business as a business, they can gain insight into pricing.
      View article »
    • Thu Jun 12th 09:11 AM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Crude Report Stumps Analysts
      RKoo-

      Astute observation about the refinery utilization rate. The notion that refiners expect a slackening of demand, or more particularly, a surfeit of supply, is bolstered by the shrinking backwardation and emergence of a contango in NYMEX spreads.


      Thanks for your comment.
      View article »
    • Mon Jun 2nd 21:36 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Hedging Gold's Volatility
      Georealist - If you look at the revenue obtainable from HL's production at current prices (say gold at $900/oz and silver at $17/oz), each metal fetches about $96 million. A pretty even split.

      Help me out with your last comment, though. Subscribe? Subscribe to what?
      View article »
    • Fri May 30th 09:51 AM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Crude Oil Dances the Contango
      Due Diligence -

      Not really. Producers are capacity-constained. They can only sell their up to their production levels. The supply's in the back months. but demand from anxious buyers is concentrated in the nearby deliveries. Bid up the front, sell the deferred to sufficient size and--bingo--you have backwardation.

      You also have spread traders taking both ends of the term structure on. Bull spreaders buy the near-term contract against a sale of a back-month delivery. For them, absolute price levels aren't so important. What counts is the size of the price differential. If the spread (nearby price minus the deferred price) becomes more pronouced becaue the front month rises more (or falls less)
      than the back month, the spreader profits.

      You can see the oil market's backwardation overlaid on top of oil inventories in the HardAssetsInvestor.com article "More Off-Base Oil Predictions" at www.hardassetsinvestor....


      View article »
    • Wed May 28th 09:03 AM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      52-to-1 Just Right for Gold/Silver Ratio?
      There may, indeed, be no predictive value of the gold/silver ratio, but that doesn't mean it doesn't get watched. The ratio is closely followed by the value investors of the metal world (see "What's Better: Gold or Silver?" at hardassetsinvestor.com...).
      View article »
    • Sun May 25th 17:20 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      A Bumper Crop of Agricultural Products
      GCC is a broad-based commodity index tracker. While GCC INCLUDES agricultural commodities, it isn't LIMITED to ags like the products compared in the table.
      View article »
    • Sun May 25th 17:15 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Enhanced Oil Returns
      Because OIL isn't an ETF. It's an ETN.

      The comparison between USO and USL--as both are ETFs--is direct. Thy're both subject to the same frictional costs. An ETN, as a structured debt instrument, isn't.
      View article »
Contribute an Article Become a Seeking Alpha Contributor