Why Merrill's CDO Sale Doesn't Mean Big Writeoffs Elsewhere [View article]
Absolutely agreed Tom. Saying every CDO needs to be written down to 22c (or 5c depending on how you view it) is like saying every stock needs to be marked down to $2 (or $10) because that's where BSC went. Ok, not the same .. but u get the idea ..
Merrill CDO Deal: How Can It Book a 'Sale'? [View article]
The option analysis is an interesting angle.
For Lone Star, this deal is oddly similar to the deal the Fed gave to JPM for Bear Sterns .. The Fed took all the downside risk after a small sliver of risk taken by JPM and JPM retained all the upside equity.
Additionally, a little noted consideration is that Lone Star is identified in ML's press release as an "affiliate", which usually means that ML has more than a 20% but less than a 50% stake in Lone Star. So a) this means it certainly wasn't an "arms length" price and b) ML may retain a small portion of the equity.
Yes, Financial Companies Can Be Analyzed [View article]
I think in a lot of the criticism for this article, you guys are missing the point. Tom Brown's thesis is that for someone willing to do the due diligence, long term bargains can be found in the financial industry NOT that financials have hit a bottom.
Calling a bottom is not what Brown has done and is absolutely not what Graham would ever do. Value investing is long term and not about market timing.
That being said, Brown claims that "investors willing to do the analysis can come up with range of loss estimates" for banks. As someone mentioned above, these level three assets like CDOs that ML has just written down again are exceedingly complex and require models put together by teams of PhDs. An individual investor will never be able to come up with this "range of loss estimates." If you can pick up Merrill's SEC filings from three months ago and estimate its $5b writedown, please give me the name of your hedge fund so I can invest!
That being said, I do agree that financials as an industry are now undervalued. However, Brown's approach of doing due diligence and picking the "best" of the pack exposes the individual investor to too much idiosyncratic risk -- no individual investor can pick out the next Bear Sterns or even Freddie or Fannie.
I think the best move for an investor with a three year horizon is to make a diversified bet on financials with 10 names in his portfolio. That way, even if one crashes and burns, he will still be able to benefit from the underlying valuations long term.
What You Can - And Can't - Learn from Warren Buffett [View article]
"Evidence of avoiding income taxes is evident throughout Berkshire's life, as the company and Buffett have always used the IRS Tax Code to their advantage. There is clearly nothing wrong with that but similarly, it is somewhat disingenuous to urge higher taxes after a career of avoiding them."
>> I disagree. If tax is 20% and someone believes that the govt should raise taxes to 30% to pay for more social services, that doesn't mean that person needs to pay extra tax himself. There is nothing hypocritical about using the existing rules to benefit yourself while believing that the rules should be changed.
Counterparty Risk Could Spread Beyond Credit Markets [View article]
@helpless No major financial institution is going to fail -- the Fed won't let it. Meanwhile, though, CDS and other derivative contracts are going to have to move towards exchanges to greatly reduce the counterparty risk. This will also hopefully increase price transparency and prevent a liquidity crisis. Problem is banks are making too much money keeping them OTC.
Indian Inflation Continues to Accelerate [View article]
Below is another post about the rupee as a very poor performer. It quotes Bloomberg pointing out that of the BRIC countries, Brazil, Russia and China have major exports while India is running a current account deficit. Together with higher inflation, this is pushing the rupee lower.
Are Airlines Stocks a Contrarian Opportunity? [View article]
The trade as you present it is simply a leveraged bet on the decline of oil prices. If that is your view, I don't see why you wouldn't make a more direct bet on oil, like buying puts.
Also, if you are most bullish on the airline that is "best managed" primarily on the basis of hedging its oil exposure, wouldn't this airline have the least to gain from a correction in oil prices? Airlines that have been punished because of insufficient hedging would gain much more. In fact, you might be best off shorting the hedger and going long another to really capture your view on oil prices declining.
Biggest Winners and Losers Since the 5/19 Top [View article]
Financials are still really volatile and risky because not many people know what is going on and there are not too many signs things are over. Meanwhile, the market decline has made growth stocks like technology and health care more attractive. I think a good play is to buy volatility during periods of rallies in the market -- especially for financials.
Agree completely with Opportunist. The Kindle is an extremely bold move whose time horizon is 5 to 10 years. You can't judge the thing in its first year. Unlike the iPhone, for example, this is Amazon's first foray into consumer electronics, and it is delving into a space where there was no market previously.
Also, Vijay doesn't mention this, but AWS (Amazon Web Services) is an extremely innovative cloud computing solution that Google is now trying to copy itself.
Explaining Bear Stearns' Current $7 Price [View article]
Shareholders will almost certainly reject this offer. On Monday morning, while all other financials hit the tank, JPM added $10b to its market cap, suggesting that BSC was worth AT LEAST $10b to JPM (and therefore likely other banks without liquidity problems). However, now that markets have somewhat stabilized, BSC is no longer today in the same position as it was on Sunday night. Therefore, BSC's counterparties are going to now be more comfortable with their risk and have had time to hedge. Shareholders reject the deal and bear is at least a $2b company by week's end.
Sort by:
Latest | Highest ratedWhy Merrill's CDO Sale Doesn't Mean Big Writeoffs Elsewhere [View article]
Merrill CDO Deal: How Can It Book a 'Sale'? [View article]
For Lone Star, this deal is oddly similar to the deal the Fed gave to JPM for Bear Sterns .. The Fed took all the downside risk after a small sliver of risk taken by JPM and JPM retained all the upside equity.
Additionally, a little noted consideration is that Lone Star is identified in ML's press release as an "affiliate", which usually means that ML has more than a 20% but less than a 50% stake in Lone Star. So a) this means it certainly wasn't an "arms length" price and b) ML may retain a small portion of the equity.
The Mystery of Merrill's Asset Reduction [View article]
CDO notional: $30.6bio
CDO sale amount: $6.7bio
ML's funding commitment on sale: 75%
ML's funding commitment notional: $6.7bio x 75% = $5.025bio
Lone Star's effective equity investment = $6.7bio - $5.025bio = $1.675bio
ML's total loss if CDOs are marked to 0: $30.6bio - 1.675bio = approx. $29bio
The Merrill Shell Game [View article]
It's Raining BRICs [View article]
India (Sensex) +265%
China (Shanghai Comp) +92%
Russia (Micex) +242%
Brazil (Bovespa) +334%
US (S&P) +25%
Maybe it does pay to diversify ...
Yes, Financial Companies Can Be Analyzed [View article]
Calling a bottom is not what Brown has done and is absolutely not what Graham would ever do. Value investing is long term and not about market timing.
That being said, Brown claims that "investors willing to do the analysis can come up with range of loss estimates" for banks. As someone mentioned above, these level three assets like CDOs that ML has just written down again are exceedingly complex and require models put together by teams of PhDs. An individual investor will never be able to come up with this "range of loss estimates." If you can pick up Merrill's SEC filings from three months ago and estimate its $5b writedown, please give me the name of your hedge fund so I can invest!
That being said, I do agree that financials as an industry are now undervalued. However, Brown's approach of doing due diligence and picking the "best" of the pack exposes the individual investor to too much idiosyncratic risk -- no individual investor can pick out the next Bear Sterns or even Freddie or Fannie.
I think the best move for an investor with a three year horizon is to make a diversified bet on financials with 10 names in his portfolio. That way, even if one crashes and burns, he will still be able to benefit from the underlying valuations long term.
What You Can - And Can't - Learn from Warren Buffett [View article]
>> I disagree. If tax is 20% and someone believes that the govt should raise taxes to 30% to pay for more social services, that doesn't mean that person needs to pay extra tax himself. There is nothing hypocritical about using the existing rules to benefit yourself while believing that the rules should be changed.
A Month of Seeing Red [View article]
Counterparty Risk Could Spread Beyond Credit Markets [View article]
On Barclays' New Carbon Emissions ETN [View article]
Indian Inflation Continues to Accelerate [View article]
maoxian.com/archive/as.../
Are Airlines Stocks a Contrarian Opportunity? [View article]
Also, if you are most bullish on the airline that is "best managed" primarily on the basis of hedging its oil exposure, wouldn't this airline have the least to gain from a correction in oil prices? Airlines that have been punished because of insufficient hedging would gain much more. In fact, you might be best off shorting the hedger and going long another to really capture your view on oil prices declining.
Biggest Winners and Losers Since the 5/19 Top [View article]
The Case for Amazon.com [View article]
Also, Vijay doesn't mention this, but AWS (Amazon Web Services) is an extremely innovative cloud computing solution that Google is now trying to copy itself.
Explaining Bear Stearns' Current $7 Price [View article]