jerry p

http://www.us.mensa.org

22 Comments

    • Will Ackman's Plan for Fannie Mae Backfire? [view article]
      IndyMac was already insovent long before Schumer said anything. The stock price went from $70 to $1.30 before the Schumer comments. It's really not sad that a bank like IndyMac was shut down. They gave out hundreds of billions worth of high LTV loans without verifying the income or assets of the borrowers. In what world will a business model like that survive? Jul 18 02:27 PM
    • Will Ackman's Plan for Fannie Mae Backfire? [view article]
      I don't think Ackman that going on CNBC is going to influence many institutions and funds if he is not making sense. IndyMac and New Century didn't go bankrupt because of shorts. Look no further than management and yourself when you lose money on your investments. Jul 16 12:26 PM
    • 'The Time to Buy Financials' Is Still Not Now [view article]
      Just because a stock fell 50% the past 3 months (100 to 50) does not mean it cannot fall another 50% the next 3 months (50 to 25). Who wants to catch the falling knife when stocks keep dropping? People who bought IMB for a bargain after it dropped from 44 to 14 are now crying as it is at 1.40 Jun 20 06:06 PM
    • Nationalizing Oil: Well-Intentioned, But Wrong [view article]
      Venezuela has the lowest gas prices in the world because it is subsidized by taxes. Why should someone who is conserving by driving a small car have to subsidize gas for someone driving a Hummer? The person who consumes the most fuel and causes the most pollution should have to pay the most money. Jun 11 02:52 PM
    • Nationalizing Oil: Well-Intentioned, But Wrong [view article]
      Saudi Aramco is 10 times bigger than Exxon-Mobil. The US oil companies are like shrimp in an ocean. They control nothing. If we socialize our oil companies, that means no more tax revenues. That means we lose all of the contracts we signed in Central Asia, South America and Africa. PeMex is the national oil company for Mexico. They are losing money despite record high oil and gas prices. That tells you how well government bureaucrats can run oil companies. Jun 11 11:50 AM
    • Nationalizing Oil: Well-Intentioned, But Wrong [view article]
      Microsoft makes obscene profits from selling Windows to the entire corporate world and government. We should socialize it. Why put so much power in the hands of one company? Jun 11 11:44 AM
    • Crude: Where's the Demand Destruction? [view article]
      The question is how much longer can these governments continue to subsidize fuel prices? Jun 11 11:35 AM
    • Stock Market Overvaluation and the Passive Investor [view article]
      Inflation will kill fixed income securities Apr 26 07:59 PM
    • The Real Solution to the Energy Problem [view article]
      Three questions:

      What happens to the battery packs at end of life? What is the cost and effect on the environment to dispose or recycle them? There will be hundreds of millions of these batteries.

      Wouldn't there be a massive shortage of raw materials needed to create hundreds of millions of those battery packs? Raw materials supply-demand problems could make widescale use of electric vehicles impractical.

      Can the current infrastrucutre support adding tens of millions of cars to the power grid? How many decades will it take to upgrade the system? Power plants and nuclear reactors aren't put up overnight.       Apr 11 02:49 PM
    • The Real Solution to the Energy Problem [view article]
      People can still immediately trade into USD positions when needed. The FX markets are bigger than the bond and stock markets combined. They can always hold their currency in Euros and trade the required amount into USD when needed. There is no need for anyone to hold dollars if they don't want to. The issue of taking payment in USD, Yen, or Euros is all smoke and mirrors when the real-time currency translation is available 24x7.

      If the Japanese want to buy $1M of oil from Iran, and the current rate is 100Y:1USD then what difference does it make what the currency for the transaction is? If the Iranians want Yen, then the Japanese transfer $100M Yen. If they want USD, then the Japanese trade $100M Yen for $1M USD and transfer $1M USD. The Iranians can take that $1M USD and trade into Yen or Euro in 5 seconds. If the Iranians want to use that money to buy an airplane from Brazil, they can immediately trade into USD or Brazilian Real in the FX markets. It's nothing more than a few keystrokes. That Iraq-USD theory would be more believable 50 years ago when crates of cash were being sent back and forth.

      The 517 trillion in derivatives is a deceptive number. The true number is closer to $120 trillion in CDS, CDO, CLO etc. Many of the derivatives in that 517 number are futures contracts, options etc. It's still a huge number and they should have been regulated.       Apr 09 03:12 PM
    • The Real Solution to the Energy Problem [view article]
      The Iraq-USD theory holds no water because those countries can immediately trade out of the USD into another currency through the FX markets. They can use their USD holdings to buy American assets and dump those USD back on us. If we lost that 20% of oil from the Middle East, what happens to our economy?

      Comparing oil and gold prices makes little sense. Once oil is taken out of the ground and refined/used, it is gone forever. Gold taken out of the ground is here forever. Expanding economies require more oil, not gold. If gold prices soared to $10,000/oz, it would not affect the economy. Rising oil prices hurt the economy.

      Conservation can start immediately, costs no money, and keeps hundreds of billions of dollars in our economy. Is it realistic to mandate that every car has a super battery installed and be a hybrid? Maybe if you are a dictator. Even then, it would take at least a decade and cost over $1 trillion to have those 150 million super batteries produced and installed just for autos in the US alone. These super batteries use barium nitrate, NiMH or lithium, so wouldn't there be a huge shortage of those materials? Prices would be driven so high that it would no longer be practical.

      Biodiesel is being studied by hundreds of scientists and institutions across the world. If it works, it will be part of the solution. If/when it gains widespread acceptance, it will still take a decade to produce/convert cars to use biodiesel.       Apr 08 10:09 PM
    • The Real Solution to the Energy Problem [view article]
      kimc, you are right. Alternatives are the future. However, we need to do something for today too.

      If this technology has been around and is more efficient than fossil fuels, what is holding it back?       Apr 07 03:59 PM
    • The Real Solution to the Energy Problem [view article]
      We are not in the Middle East for oil? Do you really believe we went to war in 1991 to defend Kuwaiti freedom? Don't tell me you're that gullible. Why aren't there US troops in Myanmar or Sudan to defend their freedom and bring Democracy there? I've heard of the USD-Iraq theory before and it doesn't hold water. Besides, what does that have to do with conserving energy in order to redirect that money to other industries? If OPEC wants to get off the USD, then it will do so whether we conserve energy or not.

      Yes, there are plenty of oil reserves out there. It's costing us $400 billion in net outflow each year to get that oil. Alaska would only be a drop in the bucket. Once we drill Alaska, and we still have a huge net outflow, where do we go next?

      From what I am reading, there is strong resistance to voluntary conservation, even though it would save this country billions of dollars, reduce pollution, and produce no harmful effects on the economy. Is that right?       Apr 07 03:57 PM
    • The Real Solution to the Energy Problem [view article]
      Folks, I'm calling for tax breaks, not bigger government. Nobody will be forced to do this, but they will be rewarded for good behavior. It's a kick-start to get the economy moving in the right direction. I agree that we also need to drill for more oil, but that alone will not solve our problems. We need a combination of approaches. Smart use of alternative energies, more drilling of oil, and conservation will be the best way to lower our energy costs. Think about this: $400 billion is leaving this country every year because we use more oil than we produce. Nearly 40% of our trade deficit is due to importing more oil than we produce.

      Electric vehicles will be part of the solution, not the entire solution. How long will it take to put the infrastructure into place to support 100 million electric cars? Can our current infrastructure support it? Besides, electric isn't completely green when you have to burn coal and NG to produce it.

      No, we are not running out of oil. Yes, we are running out of cheap oil and it is hurting our economy. What if we could keep that $400 billion in our economy each year instead of sending it overseas? The $600 tax rebate stimulus came at a $106 billion cost to the US Treasury (aka taxpayers). We could have 4 times that amount each and every year.       Apr 07 11:25 AM
    • CLOs are In; CDOs are Out [view article]
      CLO's are typically corporate debt and CDO's are various consumer debt, from mortgages, to credit cards, to boat loans to small business loans. Apr 06 12:09 AM
Loading...
Symbols:
Authors:
Quick Links:
Contribute an Article Become a Seeking Alpha Contributor

Transcripts

More Transcripts»