How the SEC Can Level the Playing Field [View article]
By your logic, the SEC should sanction naked long buying instead (or in addition).
On May 10 12:00 PM Nazbuster wrote:
> I agree that shorting naked is an abuse, but if you are so fond of > an uptick rule for shorts, why are you not advocating a "downtick" > rule for longs? Or alternatively, why not have ALL sales, including > the unloading of long shares, be required to have an uptick prior > to being able to sell the shares? Why not go even further and only > allow sales of shares at prices above their purchase only if not > held for one year or more? That would guarantee that prices only > go UP unless there are strong reasons to unload a stock. Would you > be happy with those rules as well? > > Rigging the market to favor one direction over the other is still > rigging.
Stagflation and the Limits of Growth [View article]
It isn't merely demand. Supply too will rise to accomodate, but that takes time. It is not the "below ground" resources that are bottlenecking, it's the above-ground.
How the SEC Can Level the Playing Field [View article]
On May 10 12:00 PM Nazbuster wrote:
> I agree that shorting naked is an abuse, but if you are so fond of
> an uptick rule for shorts, why are you not advocating a "downtick"
> rule for longs? Or alternatively, why not have ALL sales, including
> the unloading of long shares, be required to have an uptick prior
> to being able to sell the shares? Why not go even further and only
> allow sales of shares at prices above their purchase only if not
> held for one year or more? That would guarantee that prices only
> go UP unless there are strong reasons to unload a stock. Would you
> be happy with those rules as well?
>
> Rigging the market to favor one direction over the other is still
> rigging.
The Great Consumer Crash of 2009 [View article]
Stagflation and the Limits of Growth [View article]