Global Market Performance: Nowhere to Hide [View article]
So then, ultimately the credit is extended to doomsayers. That being so, the market may never correct upwards as generally desired. This being so, the process is not and never was a gamble. The general public continues to rely on conditional snippits of info and the big dogs continue to playout their strategies.
Well researched estimations we may trust concerned observers to offer if so inclined. But ultimately, when XYZ desires to corner a given market utilizing disposable fronts-we are mostly left as bit players in that charade. Just like Bear Sterns. You know, I actually thought there was something unholy involved in that event. It seemed that unheard of, oh the lamentations. In at 2 and out at 30, by now I could have stuffed tt in all my bill collectors mouths.
But the truth is, it is a gamble. Even when it appears to be relaying the facts. Of curse the whole world can end at any time, but in hindsight (We're always forced to look at "In The Mean Time") as having been the real issue. Therefore my present strategy has been modified to simplistic terms. "Keep an eye on the food chain (whats eating who and who'se eating what), then place your bets accordingly". That is, assuming you entertain the notion of survival!
A common sense assessment says, these trends should hold true. So glad it occured to me to look at the CANAMEX connection in advance to the squeeze play that has to be coming! Think I'll be nesting in this area awhile for welcomed insights.
It occurs to me that ultimately, financial markets are the monetary equivalent of political systems. Perhaps some are correct to suggest it not necessary to hoard gold, despite the fact that world governments take the lead in that selfsame pursuit of the "blaise blaise" medium. That factor may have something to do with the likelihood that no sane person would hope for any catastrophy but unfortunately, we all know that practically anything beyond our power to influence can prove a reasonable expectaction.
The purpose of this forum is to advise oneanother, to- wit many do their best. Although I am no expert I do recognize this, he who owns the goods may attempt to manipulate the price as he wishes. And further, re- gardless to how outlandish that price may seem if the populace is willing to support that price-it will hold until! Now, whatever you want to call us-those of us who manage to get the better grip on that factor most likely fare well depending on our situations.
OK, the price of the yellow stuff is descending. No News! Keep going as usual. Good news! If you want to unload a few bars, thats up to you. BUT, why do so on the down tick. As has been pointed out, like most everything else in life-business/politics... ments proceed in cycles.
My question:
"You in this to make money or some other less functional medium?"
And frankly, I don't want to see gold trading at 5,000 per ounce-although I suspect it could. Reason being, A VERY BAD SIGN FOR THE PLANET! While I probably should not say it, so long as it were left in the hands of a rational populace-I advise against allowing gold to advance beyond 3,000.
You know, it's a funny thing. I recently read an article accusing the Fed of manupilating the market. And it caused me to venture that the bigger banks could do the same if they so desired. Right now it would seem that we're all getting a golden opportunity to view the glogal markets based on a more accurate snapshot.
Personally I have concluded it better to invest in the bank itself when you can find one trading in your price range. Though their holdings and recommendations can be impressive. But as we are seeing, more Custers show up to save the day for banks themselves. Tried offshore, worked out pretty well. Think I'll be heading back that way when the money's back up. Probably should have jumped on Bear Sterns when I had the chance but what can I say? Guess I just didn't believe that manna still falls from Heaven!
Gold and Silver: Prepare for a Short-Term Decline [View article]
This guy has got the big picture. Squeeze the mid-little guy out of the equation before anyone gets wise. The mega powers may be mega but they can only control by way of what they know they can afford to sacrifice to maintain that control. IF every single voting age party on this planet could afford to purchase ONLY ONE bar of gold, what do you think would happen? Particularly since the facts stand as they do. Just like the man says, wise buyers know how to smile on the down tick and pick up whatever they can.
Now this may sound a hint of subversion but the funny thing about that is. The power players do the same thing day in and day out but it's not called that when they do. Micheal Douglas said it well enough for me, .........................
Why Gold is Likely to Keep Moving Higher [View article]
All said, then I guess the wherewithal of producers is not quite relevant to these equations. XYZ Mining could just happen upon the unimaginable but are also confined to the same terms as central banks, despite the possibility that a global populace should still find it desirable? I fully understand the need to control the price, where reasonable. But, what happens if the public decides that power should belong to them?
I'm afraid I'm not sure how to react to Mr. Loaddown but I will bypass politics with my response. No doubt there are numerous highly ethical participants involved in the markets. Under the prevailing circumstances, get rich quick has practically been ruled out.
The issue now becomes, how does one possibly profit operating in areas where you don't know what to expect because you no longer are certain whom you may trust. And the ones you may trust, don't always have the deciding vote. Example: If I were sitting on 200 billionUSD which I questioned the future value of, but still wanted to help you out-like you or not. Among the real estate I'd be looking to accumulate, www.bloomberg.com/apps... think i'd be shopping among the Brits on the way over. (And not so much for real estate either) So would allow the possibility that at least a few of us have some snipit of a notion whats going down?
It was a rep. of Blanchard & Co. who told me the price of gold would never go www.gata.org/node/20. For my part, that doesn't matter so much now. But for those requiring some further reference points for their future investment strategies, it may be helpful to consider!
Sort by:
Latest | Highest ratedHistoric Financial Collapse Underway? [View article]
ultimately behind it and why?
Global Market Performance: Nowhere to Hide [View article]
Global Market Performance: Nowhere to Hide [View article]
That being so, the market may never correct upwards as generally desired. This being so, the process is not and never was a gamble. The general public continues to rely on conditional snippits of info and the big dogs continue to playout their strategies.
Well researched estimations we may trust concerned observers to offer if so inclined. But ultimately, when XYZ desires to corner a given market utilizing disposable fronts-we are mostly left as bit players in that charade. Just like Bear Sterns. You know, I actually thought there was something unholy involved in that event. It seemed that unheard of, oh
the lamentations. In at 2 and out at 30, by now I could have stuffed tt in all my bill collectors mouths.
But the truth is, it is a gamble. Even when it appears
to be relaying the facts. Of curse the whole world can end at any time, but in hindsight (We're always forced to look at "In The Mean Time") as having been the real issue. Therefore my present strategy has been modified to simplistic terms. "Keep an eye on the food chain (whats eating who and who'se eating what), then place your bets accordingly". That is, assuming you entertain the notion of survival!
Transportation Stocks Continue 2008 Outperformance [View article]
Gold as an Investment? Think Again [View article]
some are correct to suggest it not necessary to hoard
gold, despite the fact that world governments take the lead in that selfsame pursuit of the "blaise blaise"
medium. That factor may have something to do with
the likelihood that no sane person would hope for any
catastrophy but unfortunately, we all know that practically anything beyond our power to influence can
prove a reasonable expectaction.
The purpose of this forum is to advise oneanother, to-
wit many do their best. Although I am no expert I do
recognize this, he who owns the goods may attempt to manipulate the price as he wishes. And further, re-
gardless to how outlandish that price may seem if the
populace is willing to support that price-it will hold until! Now, whatever you want to call us-those of us
who manage to get the better grip on that factor most
likely fare well depending on our situations.
OK, the price of the yellow stuff is descending. No News! Keep going as usual. Good news! If you want to unload a few bars, thats up to you. BUT, why do so on the down tick. As has been pointed out, like most everything else in life-business/politics...
ments proceed in cycles.
My question:
"You in this to make money or some other less functional medium?"
And frankly, I don't want to see gold trading at 5,000
per ounce-although I suspect it could. Reason being,
A VERY BAD SIGN FOR THE PLANET! While I probably
should not say it, so long as it were left in the hands
of a rational populace-I advise against allowing gold
to advance beyond 3,000.
How Cheap Are U.S. Bank Stocks? [View article]
Personally I have concluded it better to invest in the bank itself when you can find one trading in your price range. Though their holdings and recommendations can be impressive. But as we are seeing, more Custers show up to save the day for banks themselves. Tried offshore, worked out pretty well. Think I'll be heading back that way when the money's back up. Probably should have jumped on Bear Sterns when I had the chance but what can I say? Guess I just didn't believe that manna still falls from Heaven!
Gold and Silver: Prepare for a Short-Term Decline [View article]
Now this may sound a hint of subversion but the funny thing about that is. The power players do the same thing day in and day out but it's not called that when they do. Micheal Douglas said it well enough for me, .........................
Why Gold is Likely to Keep Moving Higher [View article]
could just happen upon the unimaginable but are also
confined to the same terms as central banks, despite the possibility that a global populace should still find
it desirable? I fully understand the need to control the
price, where reasonable. But, what happens if the public decides that power should belong to them?
A $1Million Wager for Gold Bears [View article]
A $1Million Wager for Gold Bears [View article]
A $1Million Wager for Gold Bears [View article]
Sorry!
A $1Million Wager for Gold Bears [View article]
doubt there are numerous highly ethical participants involved in the markets. Under the prevailing circumstances, get rich quick has practically been ruled out.
The issue now becomes, how does one possibly profit operating in areas where you don't know what to expect because you no longer are certain whom you may trust. And the ones you may trust, don't always
have the deciding vote. Example:
If I were sitting on 200 billionUSD which I questioned the future value of, but still wanted to help you out-like you or not. Among the real estate I'd be
looking to accumulate, www.bloomberg.com/apps... think i'd be shopping among the Brits on the way over. (And not so much for real estate either) So would allow the possibility that at least a few of us have some snipit of a notion whats going down?
A $1Million Wager for Gold Bears [View article]
A $1Million Wager for Gold Bears [View article]
I don't know if I'd encourage you to read any further into that FMR. Too much truth will give you a
headache or worse.
A $1Million Wager for Gold Bears [View article]
www.fgmr.com/manipulat....