It occurs to me that ultimately, financial markets are the monetary equivalent of political systems. Perhaps some are correct to suggest it not necessary to hoard gold, despite the fact that world governments take the lead in that selfsame pursuit of the "blaise blaise" medium. That factor may have something to do with the likelihood that no sane person would hope for any catastrophy but unfortunately, we all know that practically anything beyond our power to influence can prove a reasonable expectaction.
The purpose of this forum is to advise oneanother, to- wit many do their best. Although I am no expert I do recognize this, he who owns the goods may attempt to manipulate the price as he wishes. And further, re- gardless to how outlandish that price may seem if the populace is willing to support that price-it will hold until! Now, whatever you want to call us-those of us who manage to get the better grip on that factor most likely fare well depending on our situations.
OK, the price of the yellow stuff is descending. No News! Keep going as usual. Good news! If you want to unload a few bars, thats up to you. BUT, why do so on the down tick. As has been pointed out, like most everything else in life-business/politics... ments proceed in cycles.
My question:
"You in this to make money or some other less functional medium?"
And frankly, I don't want to see gold trading at 5,000 per ounce-although I suspect it could. Reason being, A VERY BAD SIGN FOR THE PLANET! While I probably should not say it, so long as it were left in the hands of a rational populace-I advise against allowing gold to advance beyond 3,000.
Gold and Silver: Prepare for a Short-Term Decline [View article]
This guy has got the big picture. Squeeze the mid-little guy out of the equation before anyone gets wise. The mega powers may be mega but they can only control by way of what they know they can afford to sacrifice to maintain that control. IF every single voting age party on this planet could afford to purchase ONLY ONE bar of gold, what do you think would happen? Particularly since the facts stand as they do. Just like the man says, wise buyers know how to smile on the down tick and pick up whatever they can.
Now this may sound a hint of subversion but the funny thing about that is. The power players do the same thing day in and day out but it's not called that when they do. Micheal Douglas said it well enough for me, .........................
Why Gold is Likely to Keep Moving Higher [View article]
All said, then I guess the wherewithal of producers is not quite relevant to these equations. XYZ Mining could just happen upon the unimaginable but are also confined to the same terms as central banks, despite the possibility that a global populace should still find it desirable? I fully understand the need to control the price, where reasonable. But, what happens if the public decides that power should belong to them?
I'm afraid I'm not sure how to react to Mr. Loaddown but I will bypass politics with my response. No doubt there are numerous highly ethical participants involved in the markets. Under the prevailing circumstances, get rich quick has practically been ruled out.
The issue now becomes, how does one possibly profit operating in areas where you don't know what to expect because you no longer are certain whom you may trust. And the ones you may trust, don't always have the deciding vote. Example: If I were sitting on 200 billionUSD which I questioned the future value of, but still wanted to help you out-like you or not. Among the real estate I'd be looking to accumulate, www.bloomberg.com/apps... think i'd be shopping among the Brits on the way over. (And not so much for real estate either) So would allow the possibility that at least a few of us have some snipit of a notion whats going down?
It was a rep. of Blanchard & Co. who told me the price of gold would never go www.gata.org/node/20. For my part, that doesn't matter so much now. But for those requiring some further reference points for their future investment strategies, it may be helpful to consider!
Well my friend, don't ever say "I told you this". I'm only referring us back to a series of events and thats only to illuminate. God forbid it should reach such a stage but contemplate this:
It seems to me that should any government discern itself to be this vulnerable, it's a bad sign for the general populace. And for damn near all to be, gives one pause. I had a curious thought just before some writer mirrored the idea. Despite all the pomp and splendor, theres looking to be new members added to the present "Third World Roster"! Hope no one got offended at that. But I would suggest we pay more attention to whats going on around here.
First, Maher-You are a cold man! Second, John2-Obviously both you and Mr. Sinclaire are generous souls. I would thank you both but so much remains to be seen. Now, in the real moment I'm afraid I must confess-I could be wrong but I think it's not so much the holders of said item to affect the price.
For example:
Should the producers ever conclude they've got us all by the balls, then this move news.goldseek.com/Jame... may just prove a futile effort! As always, your views are most welcome.
Oh yes, forgot to mention: I forget the year-think was the late eighties or early nineties. I was prepared to bet my last dollar on gold. But an "Expert" told me, the price of gold will never go up again. You can call the year, it was at 390 an ounce and this little mess we're all facing now was in it's germination phase then. So tell me, if a 1,000 was ludacris 20 years ago: What are you willing to bet that 16-2600 is all that much a joke now? All things considered, of course.
Historic Financial Collapse Underway? [View article]
ultimately behind it and why?
Gold as an Investment? Think Again [View article]
some are correct to suggest it not necessary to hoard
gold, despite the fact that world governments take the lead in that selfsame pursuit of the "blaise blaise"
medium. That factor may have something to do with
the likelihood that no sane person would hope for any
catastrophy but unfortunately, we all know that practically anything beyond our power to influence can
prove a reasonable expectaction.
The purpose of this forum is to advise oneanother, to-
wit many do their best. Although I am no expert I do
recognize this, he who owns the goods may attempt to manipulate the price as he wishes. And further, re-
gardless to how outlandish that price may seem if the
populace is willing to support that price-it will hold until! Now, whatever you want to call us-those of us
who manage to get the better grip on that factor most
likely fare well depending on our situations.
OK, the price of the yellow stuff is descending. No News! Keep going as usual. Good news! If you want to unload a few bars, thats up to you. BUT, why do so on the down tick. As has been pointed out, like most everything else in life-business/politics...
ments proceed in cycles.
My question:
"You in this to make money or some other less functional medium?"
And frankly, I don't want to see gold trading at 5,000
per ounce-although I suspect it could. Reason being,
A VERY BAD SIGN FOR THE PLANET! While I probably
should not say it, so long as it were left in the hands
of a rational populace-I advise against allowing gold
to advance beyond 3,000.
Gold and Silver: Prepare for a Short-Term Decline [View article]
Now this may sound a hint of subversion but the funny thing about that is. The power players do the same thing day in and day out but it's not called that when they do. Micheal Douglas said it well enough for me, .........................
Why Gold is Likely to Keep Moving Higher [View article]
could just happen upon the unimaginable but are also
confined to the same terms as central banks, despite the possibility that a global populace should still find
it desirable? I fully understand the need to control the
price, where reasonable. But, what happens if the public decides that power should belong to them?
A $1Million Wager for Gold Bears [View article]
A $1Million Wager for Gold Bears [View article]
A $1Million Wager for Gold Bears [View article]
Sorry!
A $1Million Wager for Gold Bears [View article]
doubt there are numerous highly ethical participants involved in the markets. Under the prevailing circumstances, get rich quick has practically been ruled out.
The issue now becomes, how does one possibly profit operating in areas where you don't know what to expect because you no longer are certain whom you may trust. And the ones you may trust, don't always
have the deciding vote. Example:
If I were sitting on 200 billionUSD which I questioned the future value of, but still wanted to help you out-like you or not. Among the real estate I'd be
looking to accumulate, www.bloomberg.com/apps... think i'd be shopping among the Brits on the way over. (And not so much for real estate either) So would allow the possibility that at least a few of us have some snipit of a notion whats going down?
A $1Million Wager for Gold Bears [View article]
A $1Million Wager for Gold Bears [View article]
I don't know if I'd encourage you to read any further into that FMR. Too much truth will give you a
headache or worse.
A $1Million Wager for Gold Bears [View article]
www.fgmr.com/manipulat....
A $1Million Wager for Gold Bears [View article]
only to illuminate. God forbid it should reach such a
stage but contemplate this:
www.fgmr.com/confiscat....
It seems to me that should any government discern
itself to be this vulnerable, it's a bad sign for the general populace. And for damn near all to be, gives
one pause. I had a curious thought just before some
writer mirrored the idea. Despite all the pomp and splendor, theres looking to be new members added to
the present "Third World Roster"! Hope no one got offended at that. But I would suggest we pay more
attention to whats going on around here.
A $1Million Wager for Gold Bears [View article]
to be seen. Now, in the real moment I'm afraid I
must confess-I could be wrong but I think it's not so
much the holders of said item to affect the price.
For example:
Should the producers ever conclude they've got us all by the balls, then this move news.goldseek.com/Jame...
may just prove a futile effort! As always, your views
are most welcome.
Peak Oil, Gold and the U.S. Dollar [View article]
A $1Million Wager for Gold Bears [View article]
price of gold will never go up again. You can call the year, it was at 390 an ounce and this little mess we're
all facing now was in it's germination phase then. So
tell me, if a 1,000 was ludacris 20 years ago:
What are you willing to bet that 16-2600 is all that much a joke now? All things considered, of course.