ArtfulDodger

Fertilizer Manufacturers Face an Uphill Battle

Friends and fellow-commentators, here's a new site to keep up with the truth about the global warming hoax.

climatedepot.com/

Agrium Shares Are Ripe for Growth - Barron's

Dear Rachael Granby:

Thank you for the well-written, concise article. It's to the point and all business, with no extraneous information that you see so much of on this site from amateur authors who toss in political comments and personal jabs.

Articles presented in this manner are the type that can help us with our investing, which is what SA is supposed to be about—not a platform for political agendas and personal attacks.

I would hope more authors would take notice of your writing.

Thanks again!

Fertilizer Manufacturers Face an Uphill Battle

grh1212:

You are wrong about the IPCC report.

In part:
"The truth is very different. Most of the media articles you will see refer to reports issued by the IPCC. The IPCC is the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate change, a political body appointed by the UN. Many of the 3,000 members of this panel are not scientists, but simply political appointees. The few real scientists on the panel have disputed the panel's findings but have been silenced by having their comments deleted from the reports.

Several of these scientists have asked to have their names removed from the IPCC report, but have had their requests denied. Several have actually sued the panel to have their names removed, but few have been successful.

The actual fact regarding consensus on this issue is that there are many more scientists who dispute the claims regarding global warming than there are who support them."
See here:
www.firecongress.org/a...

On Apr 18 05:48 PM grh1212 wrote:

> Over 1500 meteorological experts of the IPCC say that man is at least
> adding if not the main reason for global warming. The few scientists
> who argue otherwise are in the pocket of the oil companies. As far
> as the liberal bias of the media is concerned, the scandal is that
> on news shows the overwhelming conclusion of the IPCC scientists
> is paired against the opinion of 7 biased scientists and the reporter
> sounds off with "what are we to think? !500 say A but three say B.
> It's such an even split of opinion. Only Solomon could decide"<br/>

Fertilizer Manufacturers Face an Uphill Battle

Mad Trader:

Surely you're not quoting that quack, Snerlich, and being serious about it?

Note that in 1968, Paul Ehrlich, Al Snore's mentor, in his book, “The Population Bomb,” predicted there would soon be a major food shortage in the U.S. and that "in the 1970s ... hundreds of millions of people are going to starve to death." Ehrlich forecasted that 65 million Americans would die of starvation between 1980 and 1989, and by 1999 the U.S. population would have declined to 22.6 million.

Ehrlich had a real cheery outlook for England back in the `60s: "If I were a gambler,” he said, “I would take even money that England will not exist in the year 2000." This was all supposed to be brought about by “over population” and a “nuclear freeze.”

Today, Ehrlich is a Warmer—and is out and about (when the weather is hot enough; the Warmers hide all winter nowadays due to the coldness) predicting a similar outcome for the world as he did in the `60s.

Hippies and kooks of all types fell for this craziness, as they have his predictions regarding “global warming”—none of which has come close to coming true.

People who are today adamant about “Global Warming” (now called "Climate Change" because of the recent cold winters and because none of the Warmers' predictions have come true) were also adamant about other predicted catastrophes that never came about, and about which they do not mention today, such as the Y2K-con, over-population, global freezing, nuclear winters, acid rain poisoning, vanishing wildlife, killer bee onslaughts, tree shortages, water shortages, oil depletions, energy shortages, worldwide poverty, C02 poisonings, flooding of whole land masses, famines on a worldwide scale, earthquakes causing huge pieces of land to fall into the ocean, nuclear war, nuclear power plant meltdowns killing billions and envenoming whole continents, ozone depletion brought about by a “greenhouse effect,” dying coral reefs causing the deaths of all ocean life, disappearance of most oceanic fish caused by too many humans having to eat to survive, oil pipelines causing animal extinction, and every other prophesied calamity that has never come about.

I remember well all the above mentioned and predicted catastrophes, and the same type of people are falling for the most recent predictions that fell for all of those: kooks and cynics who can't reason and politicians who used them to gain more power for themselves through legislation.

If Al Snore and Snerlich were stock pickers not one of you would pay their touts any attention due to their horrible past records.

Time for Fertilizer Stocks?

Mr. David Fessler:

Not sure at all what your conclusion is in this article. It looks like get ready to buy, but watch for a while first?

The Good and Bad of Fertilizer Stocks

Good research. Good article. Thank you very much!