Murphy Mac's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com http://seekingalpha.comuser/160819/comments http://seekingalpha.com/article/160558/comments?source=feed#comment-667754 667754
And it's hard to say what could be as satisfying as the iPod mini, nano, or shuffle. Or even the Mac mini. The only thing I can imagine delivering that kind of wow is the tablet.

Hopefully Apple has thought of things in ways the rest of us aren't imaginative to have dreamed up ourselves - and more wows are on the way.

That said - wow isn't everything. I'm very satisfied with my iPhone and my Macs. My Apple TV leaves me wanting certain additions, but even it has improved media consumption in my house.

I think the next big wow is coming in January.]]> Wed, 09 Sep 2009 07:42:31 -0400
And it's hard to say what could be as satisfying as the iPod mini, nano, or shuffle. Or even the Mac mini. The only thing I can imagine delivering that kind of wow is the tablet.

Hopefully Apple has thought of things in ways the rest of us aren't imaginative to have dreamed up ourselves - and more wows are on the way.

That said - wow isn't everything. I'm very satisfied with my iPhone and my Macs. My Apple TV leaves me wanting certain additions, but even it has improved media consumption in my house.

I think the next big wow is coming in January.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/160466/comments?source=feed#comment-667109 667109
I'm convinced no Beatles announcements will be made - the move from the normal Tuesday is simply because of Labor Day. Like in 2007.

Hard to picture anything as exciting as previous events, but Apple likes to surprise. The nano came out pretty soon after the mini - and people were blown away. So who really knows?]]> Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:12:34 -0400
I'm convinced no Beatles announcements will be made - the move from the normal Tuesday is simply because of Labor Day. Like in 2007.

Hard to picture anything as exciting as previous events, but Apple likes to surprise. The nano came out pretty soon after the mini - and people were blown away. So who really knows?]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/157553/comments?source=feed#comment-640123 640123
You said the Apple TV has low sales. That's the point. NFL access would be an immediate and major boost to sales.

Yes, some people use Directv for all their channels. But some only use it for football. Directv has gotten a huge number of new subscribers by offering Sunday Ticket. I know plenty of people who have both cable and sat subscriptions.

Apple could do exactly the same thing DirecTV did - add users via the NFL.

No Apple does not have cable programming. But leaving cable providers is becoming a far more prevalent practice now with alternatives like Netflix, Hulu, iTunes, and other outlets. Every additional outlet loosens the grip satellite and cable providers have on the market.


On Aug 21 11:52 AM Dan Rayburn wrote:

> This post makes no sense.
>
> For starters, the Apple TV has a very low sales rate. Even if this
> deal was made, how many Apple TV units would they really sell? Who's
> going to spend a few hundred dollars for a device that only gives
> them NFL games?
>
> Also, people who have DirecTV use it for all their cable channels,
> not just NFL content. There would be no "exodus" from DirecTV if
> NFL games were on Apple TV because Apple TV does not give you any
> cable programming.
>
> Also, you say that "For many consumers looking to quit cable or the
> dish there was a problem: live sporting events. The MLB deal changes
> that, making live baseball games easily accessible and affordable."
>
>
> But you neglect to mention that if you want to watch your local MLB
> team, live, you can't do that via Roku or the PC with MLB's offering.
> All local games are blacked out. So how does "the MLB deal change
> that"? It doesn't.]]> Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:08:51 -0400
You said the Apple TV has low sales. That's the point. NFL access would be an immediate and major boost to sales.

Yes, some people use Directv for all their channels. But some only use it for football. Directv has gotten a huge number of new subscribers by offering Sunday Ticket. I know plenty of people who have both cable and sat subscriptions.

Apple could do exactly the same thing DirecTV did - add users via the NFL.

No Apple does not have cable programming. But leaving cable providers is becoming a far more prevalent practice now with alternatives like Netflix, Hulu, iTunes, and other outlets. Every additional outlet loosens the grip satellite and cable providers have on the market.


On Aug 21 11:52 AM Dan Rayburn wrote:

> This post makes no sense.
>
> For starters, the Apple TV has a very low sales rate. Even if this
> deal was made, how many Apple TV units would they really sell? Who's
> going to spend a few hundred dollars for a device that only gives
> them NFL games?
>
> Also, people who have DirecTV use it for all their cable channels,
> not just NFL content. There would be no "exodus" from DirecTV if
> NFL games were on Apple TV because Apple TV does not give you any
> cable programming.
>
> Also, you say that "For many consumers looking to quit cable or the
> dish there was a problem: live sporting events. The MLB deal changes
> that, making live baseball games easily accessible and affordable."
>
>
> But you neglect to mention that if you want to watch your local MLB
> team, live, you can't do that via Roku or the PC with MLB's offering.
> All local games are blacked out. So how does "the MLB deal change
> that"? It doesn't.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/155118/comments?source=feed#comment-623932 623932
Everything you say about spinning off the App Store leads to it being Android. Well - Android is out there and so far it's not doing much compared to the iPhone.

A phone is far different from a computer in terms of user expectations for the OS. A phone is more like a Tivo in that sense - you just want it to work without babysitting it. Android has a lot in common with Tivo, but start spreading it onto hundreds of hardware devices and you don't know what you'll get.

Stripping the App store from Apple's protective walls would diminish the Apps' ability to just work. And so it's just another draw into the Apple ecosystem. ]]> Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:26:09 -0400
Everything you say about spinning off the App Store leads to it being Android. Well - Android is out there and so far it's not doing much compared to the iPhone.

A phone is far different from a computer in terms of user expectations for the OS. A phone is more like a Tivo in that sense - you just want it to work without babysitting it. Android has a lot in common with Tivo, but start spreading it onto hundreds of hardware devices and you don't know what you'll get.

Stripping the App store from Apple's protective walls would diminish the Apps' ability to just work. And so it's just another draw into the Apple ecosystem. ]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/155118/comments?source=feed#comment-623359 623359
Go out on a limb, build a mobile phone when everyone insists you will fail, turn a maturing industry completely upside down, and spin it off immediately so you have no say in it anymore. Yeah, makes a lot of sense.


On Aug 10 11:37 AM rd4sndk wrote:

> You make a compelling argument. If we are to believe Apple, they
> don't make much profit off of the app store; so by spinning it off,
> they could make a lot of money on each down load with none of the
> cost.
>
> The potential cost to apple would be to leave its app store platform
> up to less imaginative people who may corrupt the present excellent
> user experience. Apple needs to make the decision if the long term
> risk out weigh the short term financial gains.]]> Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:49:08 -0400
Go out on a limb, build a mobile phone when everyone insists you will fail, turn a maturing industry completely upside down, and spin it off immediately so you have no say in it anymore. Yeah, makes a lot of sense.


On Aug 10 11:37 AM rd4sndk wrote:

> You make a compelling argument. If we are to believe Apple, they
> don't make much profit off of the app store; so by spinning it off,
> they could make a lot of money on each down load with none of the
> cost.
>
> The potential cost to apple would be to leave its app store platform
> up to less imaginative people who may corrupt the present excellent
> user experience. Apple needs to make the decision if the long term
> risk out weigh the short term financial gains.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/154263/comments?source=feed#comment-617770 617770 Thu, 06 Aug 2009 09:27:25 -0400 http://seekingalpha.com/article/153220/comments?source=feed#comment-612926 612926
There's nothing to understand, the AT&T vs. Verizon discussion is almost pointless. AT&T works for you. It drops calls for me. It's geographical. I was in Miami a couple weeks ago and AT&T had full bars EVERYWHERE I went.
Here in Charlotte there are giant gaps in highly populated areas four miles outside the city center. I live one mile out and even here I fail to get a signal at times. Verizon never dropped calls for me.

That said, outside AT&T the iPhone 3GS surpasses virtually every expectation I had. Except the still-photo camera.


On Aug 03 09:48 AM vassar wrote:

> I don't understand the problems people have with ATT. I had Verzion
> beforehand and now ATT and have not had any problems, both in rural
> and in metropolitan areas.]]> Mon, 03 Aug 2009 11:50:34 -0400
There's nothing to understand, the AT&T vs. Verizon discussion is almost pointless. AT&T works for you. It drops calls for me. It's geographical. I was in Miami a couple weeks ago and AT&T had full bars EVERYWHERE I went.
Here in Charlotte there are giant gaps in highly populated areas four miles outside the city center. I live one mile out and even here I fail to get a signal at times. Verizon never dropped calls for me.

That said, outside AT&T the iPhone 3GS surpasses virtually every expectation I had. Except the still-photo camera.


On Aug 03 09:48 AM vassar wrote:

> I don't understand the problems people have with ATT. I had Verzion
> beforehand and now ATT and have not had any problems, both in rural
> and in metropolitan areas.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/153174/comments?source=feed#comment-612908 612908
Google Voice is not VOIP. The calls are completed by making an outgoing voice call or receiving an incoming voice call. If you're using Google Voice to talk to someone using your mobile phone you are consuming your cellular voice minutes. It's not "freeloading" as you suggest.

SMS is another story. Google Voice can be used to completely bypass AT&T for SMS in the U.S. You don't need the app to do this, but it makes it easier and more convenient with an app.]]> Mon, 03 Aug 2009 11:41:36 -0400
Google Voice is not VOIP. The calls are completed by making an outgoing voice call or receiving an incoming voice call. If you're using Google Voice to talk to someone using your mobile phone you are consuming your cellular voice minutes. It's not "freeloading" as you suggest.

SMS is another story. Google Voice can be used to completely bypass AT&T for SMS in the U.S. You don't need the app to do this, but it makes it easier and more convenient with an app.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/153198/comments?source=feed#comment-612165 612165
That said, the video camera almost makes up for the lame still-photo camera.

Apple should consider making the volume buttons a shutter release. It could help.]]> Sun, 02 Aug 2009 20:18:37 -0400
That said, the video camera almost makes up for the lame still-photo camera.

Apple should consider making the volume buttons a shutter release. It could help.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/153174/comments?source=feed#comment-611566 611566
A Google Voice app is mostly a threat to AT&T's SMS business, as it allows sending and receiving of free SMS messages. Goodbye twenty dollars a month for unlimited texting. Indirectly, Google Voice as a whole is a threat as people can use their landlines for free long distance instead of chewing up cellular minutes.

With that in mind, I'm happy to see the FCC poke a stick at this. I doubt anything will come of it. But maybe someone besides Senator Herb Kohl will question why the carriers have established twenty cents as the cost of an SMS message when industry experts claim the actual cost is negligible. That price points to collusion by the monopoly carriers.

AT&T might rethink their whole stance: Google Voice could make using voice services bearable again, a goal the carriers have not lifted a finger to achieve. Voice minutes are hugely profitable, especially when the plans require purchasing more minutes than someone wants to use. I suspect Google Voice will lead to me using voice minutes more often. It would be interesting to know what AT&T thinks of that possibility.]]> Sun, 02 Aug 2009 12:05:32 -0400
A Google Voice app is mostly a threat to AT&T's SMS business, as it allows sending and receiving of free SMS messages. Goodbye twenty dollars a month for unlimited texting. Indirectly, Google Voice as a whole is a threat as people can use their landlines for free long distance instead of chewing up cellular minutes.

With that in mind, I'm happy to see the FCC poke a stick at this. I doubt anything will come of it. But maybe someone besides Senator Herb Kohl will question why the carriers have established twenty cents as the cost of an SMS message when industry experts claim the actual cost is negligible. That price points to collusion by the monopoly carriers.

AT&T might rethink their whole stance: Google Voice could make using voice services bearable again, a goal the carriers have not lifted a finger to achieve. Voice minutes are hugely profitable, especially when the plans require purchasing more minutes than someone wants to use. I suspect Google Voice will lead to me using voice minutes more often. It would be interesting to know what AT&T thinks of that possibility.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/150189/comments?source=feed#comment-596785 596785
I'd say the odds are around 50,000,000:1 against Apple commenting on the tablet in your bulleted "keys to the call" list. They might make a vague reference to China though.]]> Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:36:45 -0400
I'd say the odds are around 50,000,000:1 against Apple commenting on the tablet in your bulleted "keys to the call" list. They might make a vague reference to China though.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/139651/comments?source=feed#comment-518260 518260
I used the Apple TV for podcasts, music, and video. With Airfoil I can use the Apple TV to listen to Pandora or other music streaming sites. The iPhone is a great Apple TV remote.

Mentioning the Apple TV as an after-thought in a story about Apple Media Servers? Hmmm.....]]> Tue, 26 May 2009 14:18:25 -0400
I used the Apple TV for podcasts, music, and video. With Airfoil I can use the Apple TV to listen to Pandora or other music streaming sites. The iPhone is a great Apple TV remote.

Mentioning the Apple TV as an after-thought in a story about Apple Media Servers? Hmmm.....]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/137175/comments?source=feed#comment-500268 500268
iPhone is just getting started. Do you know how many times analysts declared the iPod space was saturated - nobody left to sell them to? Wrong quarter after quarter. Repeat coming with iPhones.

Blackberry users rival Apple fans in terms of loyalty. Not quite as loyal - but it would take a lot for them to consider switching to Sprint for a device that may or may not be part of a company (Palm) on the verge of bankruptcy.]]> Tue, 12 May 2009 09:58:24 -0400
iPhone is just getting started. Do you know how many times analysts declared the iPod space was saturated - nobody left to sell them to? Wrong quarter after quarter. Repeat coming with iPhones.

Blackberry users rival Apple fans in terms of loyalty. Not quite as loyal - but it would take a lot for them to consider switching to Sprint for a device that may or may not be part of a company (Palm) on the verge of bankruptcy.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/136917/comments?source=feed#comment-498953 498953
Is aapl one of those stocks you hold forever? If I saw them making serious enterprise plans I'd say yes. I don't see that happening, and it makes me wonder how aapl can move past $200.

Note for Paul Goodwin: Apple hasn't made a Powerbook since 2006.]]> Mon, 11 May 2009 11:02:55 -0400
Is aapl one of those stocks you hold forever? If I saw them making serious enterprise plans I'd say yes. I don't see that happening, and it makes me wonder how aapl can move past $200.

Note for Paul Goodwin: Apple hasn't made a Powerbook since 2006.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/136416/comments?source=feed#comment-495199 495199
Same with the cellular industry. Why did it take Apple to force something as obvious as visual voicemail?

The landline industry has ignored the VOIP phenomenon going on around them - too slow to even offer new features as PAID services. And now Google is going to offer more than the Bells ever would have dreamed of charging us for - for free.

We never learn about monopolies. Time Warner wants to charge us for Internet consumption by use, fine. But they don't even have the means in place to tell us what we consume. Like other monopolies they're fat and lazy - they just want their check.

Google is taking these businesses apart - like the Fed should have.]]> Fri, 08 May 2009 07:56:07 -0400
Same with the cellular industry. Why did it take Apple to force something as obvious as visual voicemail?

The landline industry has ignored the VOIP phenomenon going on around them - too slow to even offer new features as PAID services. And now Google is going to offer more than the Bells ever would have dreamed of charging us for - for free.

We never learn about monopolies. Time Warner wants to charge us for Internet consumption by use, fine. But they don't even have the means in place to tell us what we consume. Like other monopolies they're fat and lazy - they just want their check.

Google is taking these businesses apart - like the Fed should have.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/135572/comments?source=feed#comment-491564 491564
HOWEVER - You're proof of a point I tried to make on appleinsider.com yesterday. Twitter can do the things you point out. And the door is open because RSS has not gained traction.

I know tons of people who waste time hopping from site to site in search of fresh news instead of just setting up RSS feeds in a reader. RSS intimidates them somehow.

Twitter? Like Jason - people have found ways to get the information they want.

To me - Apple would only buy Twitter if the cost per active user made sense. Otherwise they could do it themselves. Further, I don't think Apple would be interested in Twitter in its current state. They'd expand its functions. I don't know how many people use Apple's iChat. I know I don't. But I so use Twitter from time to time. (murphymac)

Anyway - there's potential in what Apple could do with Twitter. But I don't think they need to pay $700 million to get it. Someone should have learned a lesson watching eBay buy Skype.

]]> Wed, 06 May 2009 08:29:35 -0400
HOWEVER - You're proof of a point I tried to make on appleinsider.com yesterday. Twitter can do the things you point out. And the door is open because RSS has not gained traction.

I know tons of people who waste time hopping from site to site in search of fresh news instead of just setting up RSS feeds in a reader. RSS intimidates them somehow.

Twitter? Like Jason - people have found ways to get the information they want.

To me - Apple would only buy Twitter if the cost per active user made sense. Otherwise they could do it themselves. Further, I don't think Apple would be interested in Twitter in its current state. They'd expand its functions. I don't know how many people use Apple's iChat. I know I don't. But I so use Twitter from time to time. (murphymac)

Anyway - there's potential in what Apple could do with Twitter. But I don't think they need to pay $700 million to get it. Someone should have learned a lesson watching eBay buy Skype.

]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/133115/comments?source=feed#comment-477243 477243 - A lot of companies haven't authorized iPhone use yet. They will.
- Many companies are heavily invested in BB infrastructure. A change will take time. But it will come.
- Apple is positioning itself to undercut Microsoft with Apple Server products. Apple doesn't charge for client access licenses, MS does for server access, Exchange, etc. iPhone will help these conversions happen, starting with smaller organizations.

Like you said, plenty of people entered new contracts with non-iPhones around the time the iPhone came out. Now the iPhone has proven itself and those contracts will lead to another surge for AT&T beginning in July and padding iPhone sales for the rest of the year.


]]> Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:29:29 -0400 - A lot of companies haven't authorized iPhone use yet. They will.
- Many companies are heavily invested in BB infrastructure. A change will take time. But it will come.
- Apple is positioning itself to undercut Microsoft with Apple Server products. Apple doesn't charge for client access licenses, MS does for server access, Exchange, etc. iPhone will help these conversions happen, starting with smaller organizations.

Like you said, plenty of people entered new contracts with non-iPhones around the time the iPhone came out. Now the iPhone has proven itself and those contracts will lead to another surge for AT&T beginning in July and padding iPhone sales for the rest of the year.


]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/131929/comments?source=feed#comment-470899 470899

]]> Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:08:27 -0400

]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/130829/comments?source=feed#comment-462533 462533
Based on the slant in your four short paragraphs you could have signed this "iPhone Hater".

"Once the Apple story gets old" Come on ! We're not even TWO YEARS into the iPhone! And Apple's F I R S T phone !!!

I don't think the "three bills" an iPhone requires are the compelling story either. What would be more interesting to ponder is an iPhone variant without a required data plan. An iPhone that was just a phone and an iPod, like the ROKR. But now that Apple knows how to make phones it could probably build something that would actually sell.

Does the negativity in this article have anything to do with the tablet TechCrunch is working on?




]]> Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:53:58 -0400
Based on the slant in your four short paragraphs you could have signed this "iPhone Hater".

"Once the Apple story gets old" Come on ! We're not even TWO YEARS into the iPhone! And Apple's F I R S T phone !!!

I don't think the "three bills" an iPhone requires are the compelling story either. What would be more interesting to ponder is an iPhone variant without a required data plan. An iPhone that was just a phone and an iPod, like the ROKR. But now that Apple knows how to make phones it could probably build something that would actually sell.

Does the negativity in this article have anything to do with the tablet TechCrunch is working on?




]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/129442/comments?source=feed#comment-452799 452799
And should Apple muck up their phone a little so people won't want to use it for browsing or streaming video? That should save bandwidth.

What is the point of this story?!

]]> Sun, 05 Apr 2009 20:53:35 -0400
And should Apple muck up their phone a little so people won't want to use it for browsing or streaming video? That should save bandwidth.

What is the point of this story?!

]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/128524/comments?source=feed#comment-445479 445479
Meaning, the stock will go up instead of down in the event that people buy more Apple products. Thanks Mike. Aren't you a useful tool?

How many quarters did the analysts predict that the iPod market was super-saturated - only to have yet another record breaking quarter? How many times did the analysts explain how they got that so wrong?

Doublespeak, smoke, mirrors - and you too can be an analyst.]]> Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:23:22 -0400
Meaning, the stock will go up instead of down in the event that people buy more Apple products. Thanks Mike. Aren't you a useful tool?

How many quarters did the analysts predict that the iPod market was super-saturated - only to have yet another record breaking quarter? How many times did the analysts explain how they got that so wrong?

Doublespeak, smoke, mirrors - and you too can be an analyst.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/128327/comments?source=feed#comment-444554 444554
Browsers.
Search n' Cloud.
Mobile

I think their late arrival in mobile will underscore their inability to innovate and mark the beginning of a steady decline.

NT was an incomplete copy of UNIX, (read Show Stopper) Zune is an uninspired copy of the iPod.

Nobody has ever used a significant percentage of the features MS forced us to buy in overpriced Office. Office isn't a must-have anymore - alternatives are aplenty. Windows is far less important than it was ten years ago.

If someone developed serious competition for Exchange MS would really be up against the ropes.]]> Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:21:22 -0400
Browsers.
Search n' Cloud.
Mobile

I think their late arrival in mobile will underscore their inability to innovate and mark the beginning of a steady decline.

NT was an incomplete copy of UNIX, (read Show Stopper) Zune is an uninspired copy of the iPod.

Nobody has ever used a significant percentage of the features MS forced us to buy in overpriced Office. Office isn't a must-have anymore - alternatives are aplenty. Windows is far less important than it was ten years ago.

If someone developed serious competition for Exchange MS would really be up against the ropes.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/128277/comments?source=feed#comment-443679 443679
As someone else said, there is no Pre. A story like this isn't out of line to ignore it - although mentioning it in passing might make sense given the hype we've seen.

But seriously, other phones have gotten the hype as iPhone killers only to fall far short on launch.

]]> Sat, 28 Mar 2009 20:19:52 -0400
As someone else said, there is no Pre. A story like this isn't out of line to ignore it - although mentioning it in passing might make sense given the hype we've seen.

But seriously, other phones have gotten the hype as iPhone killers only to fall far short on launch.

]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/127294/comments?source=feed#comment-436275 436275
This article is little more than a user comment on a gadget blog.

Why don't you go write it again and try a little harder. I'm interested in why I should want a Google phone instead of an iPhone. I'm also interested in why a non-technical user would be better off with the Google phone.

And have an editor read it before you post it. ]]> Mon, 23 Mar 2009 07:59:53 -0400
This article is little more than a user comment on a gadget blog.

Why don't you go write it again and try a little harder. I'm interested in why I should want a Google phone instead of an iPhone. I'm also interested in why a non-technical user would be better off with the Google phone.

And have an editor read it before you post it. ]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/127135/comments?source=feed#comment-435493 435493
Cisco would be at the top my list of companies that could cull some sense out of Yahoo. Maybe some cents too.


]]> Sun, 22 Mar 2009 13:50:54 -0400
Cisco would be at the top my list of companies that could cull some sense out of Yahoo. Maybe some cents too.


]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/126953/comments?source=feed#comment-433444 433444
]]> Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:48:55 -0400
]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/127000/comments?source=feed#comment-433405 433405
That said, I don't necessarily agree that paying more for a download is appropriate. The market will shake out what's worth what. But that could take a while, especially if studios and labels continue to punish Apple.

]]> Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:27:00 -0400
That said, I don't necessarily agree that paying more for a download is appropriate. The market will shake out what's worth what. But that could take a while, especially if studios and labels continue to punish Apple.

]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/126948/comments?source=feed#comment-433360 433360
Unfortunately your behavior is rewarded in the end, as stories covering aapl draw hits. It doesn't stop me from being embarrassed for you though.]]> Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:11:40 -0400
Unfortunately your behavior is rewarded in the end, as stories covering aapl draw hits. It doesn't stop me from being embarrassed for you though.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/125866/comments?source=feed#comment-424307 424307
Maybe you should read a little about the development of the iPhone's screen technology.

electronics.howstuffwo...

]]> Fri, 13 Mar 2009 09:47:15 -0400
Maybe you should read a little about the development of the iPhone's screen technology.

electronics.howstuffwo...

]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/124915/comments?source=feed#comment-419114 419114
Apple has the discipline not to run around making senseless acquisitions. The cash they have now lets them continue to research new markets and products while the competition scrambles to keep up.

I'm glad Apple has ignored the hundreds of articles pushing them to spend the cash.]]> Mon, 09 Mar 2009 10:53:15 -0400
Apple has the discipline not to run around making senseless acquisitions. The cash they have now lets them continue to research new markets and products while the competition scrambles to keep up.

I'm glad Apple has ignored the hundreds of articles pushing them to spend the cash.]]>