Seeking Alpha

devassocx » Comments » AXPW.OB

  • White House Report: GM Volt Is Not Ready for Prime Time [View article]
    If a solution won't work unless the older alternative solution's
    price is raised via taxation then I say that the new solution is
    a very poor one.

    That is what I would expect from an agenda driven government,
    not from a practical, thinking government.

    New ways to do things should offer benefits unavailable
    with the old way in such quantity as to command a higher price,
    not because of a government distortion of the pricing system.


    On Apr 24 08:57 AM Steven Chu wrote:

    > The US only has the production capacity for hamsters - but Asia has
    > horses. And they are Li-ion horses being sold in massive quantities.
    >
    >
    > The dumbest thing we could do is not stimulate these firms. Of course
    > they are losing. And that is partially due to poor historical policy
    > to create incentives for better technology, manufacturing, and cost
    > reduction. Subsidized gas instead of subsidized EVs and batteries.
    >
    >
    > It will be expensive. But stimulating these companies is necessary.
    >
    >
    > Battery technology and vehicle design must be parallel processes
    > and must be continuous. We may end up driving GM/Segway PUMAs instead
    > of sedans, but it won't happen with US batteries if we sit on the
    > sidelines.
    >
    > And remember, half of the battle is getting consumers used to the
    > idea of using a different type of vehicle - this needs time, momentum,
    > and marketing. It won't happen unless there are incentives from the
    > consumer and producer sides, and unless alternatives (combustion
    > horses) ado not have their carbon mitigation costs priced in.
    >
    > $27 billion manufacturer incentives, $7500 consumer subsidy, government
    > purchase of EV fleets, and gas tax for $3.50 gas. This is the formula
    > for change.
    >
    Apr 25 14:22 pm |Rating: 0 -1 |Link to Comment
  • Response to Jack Lifton's 'Lithium Batteries: Nothing But Illusion'  [View article]
    But isn't lead toxic and a danger to the environment?
    And isn't the acid the same?


    On Apr 22 12:58 PM altaman wrote:

    > Actually lithium is the wrong approach to motor vehicles because
    > it is too expensive and highly toxic. Just how is anyone going to
    > sell the used cars when they require a $5000-10000 battery replacement?
    > A better approach is the so called advanced lead-acid battery mated
    > to a large capacitor to buffer and protect the acid cells (developed
    > in Australia). Its is about 1/3 the cost while being only 1/3 heaver.
    > That is an extremely worthwhile tradeoff particularly in larger vehicles.
    Apr 23 23:57 pm |Rating: +1 0 |Link to Comment
More on AXPW.OB by devassocx
devassocx's
Comments Stats
96 comments
Rating: 63 (96 - 33 )