devassocx

Too Big to Fail Banks: A Simple Solution

yes, what is this 'too big to fail' nonsense???

There is no reason to go beyond that statement.

The answer is simple...just cut up these giants.

Then their failure would not comprise devastation
on national economies.

Just no need to agonize over some expensive, convoluted and complex maze of laws and regulations.


On Nov 10 11:08 AM fizzicyst wrote:

> Not simple and not effective enough. You just gave the reasons why:
> lawyers/loopholes.
>
> The only foolproof way is break them into pieces small enough to
> fail and them let'em. No ineffective regulators involved !

Why GM's Not the Only Company Rush Limbaugh Should Boycott

I don't listen to Rush all the time but it seems to me that
recently GM ads have been running on his program, so I don't
really know what the point of this article is.


On Jun 10 11:32 PM Mr. Ed, Jr. wrote:

> The report is incorrect. Limbaugh does not support a boycott. (There
> is nothing in the author's quotes that has Limbaugh supporting the
> boycott-- he only is saying that many Americans are boycotting )
>
>
> The following is Limbaugh's response to the media story :
>
> " Now, for the record, ladies and gentlemen, I don't do boycotts.
> I do not sponsor them; I do not encourage them. I never have. I
> think it is media childishness when people start urging boycotts.
> I have never, ever done such a thing, and I didn't do this with General
> Motors. All I did, to clarify, was report a poll that said X number
> of Americans -- what was it, 18 or 20% -- say they are not going
> to buy a GM car anymore, after this bailout. "
>
> Also, I do not believe Sean Hannity is supporting a boycott. Last
> I heard, he was still doing "spontaneous" infomercials for his Cadillac.
>
>
> Hugh Hewitt was another conservative named in the Detroit News story.
> I do not know Hewitt's views on a boycott, but since the media has
> it wrong about Limbaugh (as usual), there is no reason to believe
> they got the rest of the story right.