Bear Stearns: Why It's Safe to Bet Against Joe Lewis [View article]
Everyone, please extend your wise counsel on this conundrum that I cannot figure out:
1. If JPMorgan is Bear Stearns' biggest counterparty, wouldn't it be forced to buy Bear out at any given price? If not JPM will go bankrupt = either a bullet in the stomach or one in the heart.
2. If JPM may fail because of the BSC fiasco, wouldn't GS, MS etc want to jump in and acquire JPM at US$2 a share? Otherwise, as JPM's counterparty they may also face bankruptcy.
3. What is preventing investment banks from going through waves of mega-mergers like automobiles (3 left) and aerospace (1 left) industries?
4. In case i-banks are nationalised and therefore tied to the tighest strait-jackets in terms of leverage, would there be any point at all in their indepedent existence from commercial banks?
5. How is any kind of risk management effective, when on 30 times leverage, the markets you deal in move more than 3.33% a day?
-
Everyone, please extend your wise counsel on this conundrum that I cannot figure out:
Mar 24 02:35 am
|Rating:
0
0
All Comments by roger maxims »Bear Stearns: Why It's Safe to Bet Against Joe Lewis [View article]
1. If JPMorgan is Bear Stearns' biggest counterparty, wouldn't it be forced to buy Bear out at any given price? If not JPM will go bankrupt = either a bullet in the stomach or one in the heart.
2. If JPM may fail because of the BSC fiasco, wouldn't GS, MS etc want to jump in and acquire JPM at US$2 a share? Otherwise, as JPM's counterparty they may also face bankruptcy.
3. What is preventing investment banks from going through waves of mega-mergers like automobiles (3 left) and aerospace (1 left) industries?
4. In case i-banks are nationalised and therefore tied to the tighest strait-jackets in terms of leverage, would there be any point at all in their indepedent existence from commercial banks?
5. How is any kind of risk management effective, when on 30 times leverage, the markets you deal in move more than 3.33% a day?