Biofuel Production Will Continue to Grow [View article]
Biofuels will continue to grow because the biofuels industry has become a powerful special interest with powerful friends in high places in Congress, and Congress can stick it in the eye of big oil by creating nonsensical mandates. All the rest is wind and blather.
Isn't the real issue that a bankruptcy of the Big 3 automakers would leave the UAW with nothing to do? Their political friends in Congress will keep that from happening, that's for sure.
The big problem I think is retiree's health care costs. When I retire from the Fortune 500 company where I work I will still be able to use my company's health insurance policy. But the company won't subsidize me (I will pay the full freight). That's the way it is for most people I've talked to from big companies with good health insurance policies. The Big 3 shouldn't be on the hook for retiree's health care policies and the more they downsize the worse the problem will get, because there will be fewer workers for every retiree. The problem with a bailout, as I understand it, is that it won't change that basic equation, and without a change there it won't be long until the Big 3 are just back asking for more.
We shouldn't bail out the government, either. They've done the worst job of all.
On Nov 21 02:54 PM mitchm wrote:
> To those who oppose to Auto Industry Bail out; > > > In a perfect world of Capitalism only the strong survive and business > takes care of itself. But those are not the ground rules we have > been playing under. The government has controlled and mismanaged > the credit markets with the introduction of the Community Reinvestment > Act and followed it up with deregulating and miss managing Fannie > Mae and Freddie Mac to the point that our credit system almost collapsed. > > Add to that the deregulation of the futures market that allowed oil > to hit $147.00 per barrel and started a consumer driver recession. > It is the governments fault, they caused the problem and they should > stand good to fix it. Gm has been in a restructure program for the > last several years that should reach a majority of it’s goals by > 2010. I’m talking about moving the legacy cost of the retirees to > the UAW, which with other cuts and changes would drastically improve > Gm’s underlying cost > per vehicle. Some say that GM built gas guzzler SUV’s and trucks > that the public didn’t want, but that was untrue, an out right lie. > They were built due to demand for such vehicles, look at your local > Toyota lot and see the number of full size V-8 trucks and SUV’s. > Toyota saw the demand and was trying to tap into that large market. > It was $4.00 a gallon gas that killed it in less than a month and > no company can change > production over in less than 6 months and retool especially with > the availability of loans gone. The government subsidized these large > vehicles with large tax credits for business owners and drove the > demand even higher. Another government mess up. We pay more to other > countries in the form of aid to help with our security. Those opposed > to helping out our manufacturing base survive the mess ups of the > government should ask themselves who will build the tanks and planes > the next time we need them. It makes me sick to my stomach to see > supposedly grown men and women play these political games and argue > over the fate of millions of worker’s future when they caused the > problem to begin with. It’s time for our elected officials to get > off their, he said she said, politically driven backsides, accept > the responsibility that they know is their’s and fix this short term > problem.
Congress Offers Big Three Automakers Help, Makes Demands in Exchange [View article]
With a burn rate of $2.3 billion a month, the latest loan will last until about a year before the Volt is scheduled to launch. Will there be another $25 billion bailout next year to get to the Volt, and another the following year to tide them over until the Volt starts to make money, which it probably won't? That would make $100 billion in all, or about $40 a share for two stocks (not counting Chrysler) that are trading in the range of $1-3 dollars a share.
Congress' motto: No price is too high that it can't be paid with taxpayers' money.
Biofuel Production Will Continue to Grow [View article]
The Tyranny of the Shareholders [View article]
Six Myths about the Big Three [View article]
Bail Out Capitalism, Not Detroit [View article]
On Nov 21 02:54 PM mitchm wrote:
> To those who oppose to Auto Industry Bail out;
>
>
> In a perfect world of Capitalism only the strong survive and business
> takes care of itself. But those are not the ground rules we have
> been playing under. The government has controlled and mismanaged
> the credit markets with the introduction of the Community Reinvestment
> Act and followed it up with deregulating and miss managing Fannie
> Mae and Freddie Mac to the point that our credit system almost collapsed.
>
> Add to that the deregulation of the futures market that allowed oil
> to hit $147.00 per barrel and started a consumer driver recession.
> It is the governments fault, they caused the problem and they should
> stand good to fix it. Gm has been in a restructure program for the
> last several years that should reach a majority of it’s goals by
> 2010. I’m talking about moving the legacy cost of the retirees to
> the UAW, which with other cuts and changes would drastically improve
> Gm’s underlying cost
> per vehicle. Some say that GM built gas guzzler SUV’s and trucks
> that the public didn’t want, but that was untrue, an out right lie.
> They were built due to demand for such vehicles, look at your local
> Toyota lot and see the number of full size V-8 trucks and SUV’s.
> Toyota saw the demand and was trying to tap into that large market.
> It was $4.00 a gallon gas that killed it in less than a month and
> no company can change
> production over in less than 6 months and retool especially with
> the availability of loans gone. The government subsidized these large
> vehicles with large tax credits for business owners and drove the
> demand even higher. Another government mess up. We pay more to other
> countries in the form of aid to help with our security. Those opposed
> to helping out our manufacturing base survive the mess ups of the
> government should ask themselves who will build the tanks and planes
> the next time we need them. It makes me sick to my stomach to see
> supposedly grown men and women play these political games and argue
> over the fate of millions of worker’s future when they caused the
> problem to begin with. It’s time for our elected officials to get
> off their, he said she said, politically driven backsides, accept
> the responsibility that they know is their’s and fix this short term
> problem.
Bail Out Capitalism, Not Detroit [View article]
Congress Offers Big Three Automakers Help, Makes Demands in Exchange [View article]
Congress' motto: No price is too high that it can't be paid with taxpayers' money.