golfcrackerjack

Total Rating:
0 / 0

1 Comment

    • Fri Mar 14th 02:29 AM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Pfizer vs. the New England Journal of Medicine: A Significant Legal Showdown
      While all this author wrote about PFE's legal strategies and tactics may be true and of import, it's my hope that the nut issues that underlie this tussle will eventually add up to one more board in the coffin of the practice of confidential reviews of biomedical journal submissions. Referees (as a class) ought to take more responsibility for their reviews than is now the case. Knowing that one's name -- as a reviewer -- will be published along with reviewed articles will improve the quality of reviews -- & even more important, will ultimately improve the quality of the published science as well.
      I'd be the first to admit that there may be some circumstances where reviewers' identities should be kept secret, but the default position for serious journals ought to be transparency, not secrecy.
      Aloha from lovely Hawaii...
      PS. Some journals are now revealing authors' names to reviewers... which is a small and MUCH less significant step in the right direction.
      View article »
Contribute an Article Become a Seeking Alpha Contributor