crashof2008

Total Rating:
0 / 0

31 Comments

    • Tue Jun 24th 07:15 AM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Whitman's Q2 Letter and Disclosure Requirements
      This is absurd. Did it ever occur to you that the historical volatility assumptions used in modeling the "value" of MBI's CDOs are completely irrational?

      Duh.

      Maybe if you had beyond college algebra you would understand that MBI is truly, irrevocably bankrupt.

      See you in January, when FASB 163 takes full force.
      View article »
    • Mon Jun 23rd 13:52 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      The End of the Monoline Bond Insurance Business
      One phrase in MBI's recent bland assurances that they have sufficient capital to meet the acceleration clauses on these swaps is that they have "10.2 billion in securities with an AVERAGE AA rating".

      What does that hedge word "average" mean here? There are many ways to compute an "average".

      For example, 10 bonds worth only 10,000 dollars each that are rated just one notch above AA "averaged" with 10 bonds worth 100 MILLION dollars rated just one notch BELOW AA would constitute such an "average" under this statement, even though the practical result would be that the vast majority of the alleged "collateral" is rated below AA.

      Given MBI's record of dissembling, it seems highly likely that a large part of that 10.2 billion figure they cite is BELOW AA and will therefore be insufficient as collateral.

      The key weasel fudge word MBI uses here is "average". Precisely HOW are they doing this "averaging"?
      View article »
    • Sun Jun 22nd 14:18 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      On the Monolines: Brown vs. Tilson, Round 2
      Brown didn't just betray the rating agencies. He betrayed the people of New York and the the insurance commissioner with his lies and his betrayal and false promises.

      It's payback time now. If he thinks that he can spin off a AAA unit and provide huge bonuses in the process for him and his henchmen, he is seriously, seriously mistaken.

      View article »
    • Sun Jun 22nd 09:14 AM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      On the Monolines: Brown vs. Tilson, Round 2
      This is one of the most inaccurate and distorted pieces of "journalism" i have ever read. It is a hodgepodge of confusion and dissembling.

      The safe harbour language which he cites are about public statements offered in the connection with trading of registered securities. Nothing more, nothing less.

      But to use this safe harbour language to defend MBI's completely unacceptable betrayal of its pledges to the ratings agencies is pathetic.

      Earlier this year, MBI was intent on keeping its AAA rating. During the negotiations with the ratings agencies, Spitzer and Dinallo, MBI pledged that they would deploy the proceeds of various securities to be offered as a buffer to risky assets in various subsidiaries.

      In exchange for this pledge, promise and commitment, all the other parties in the negotiation agreed to keep MBI's AAA rating intact on a provisional basis, pending periodic review required by the continuing collapse in key sectors of the derivatives market, including the term option bond sector used in short term muni financing, of which MBI is a market maker.

      Simply stated, MBI broke that pledge they made during the negotiations. Now the ratings agencies are furious. They have been betrayed.

      And to claim that somehow safe harbour language routinely issued in the issuance of securities issuance excuses their betrayal of the firm commitments they made to a number of key regulatory and quasi-public actors during critical negotiations is simply absurd.

      Who are you trying to kid?

      And the gibberish in this article goes on. I'll elaborate more fully shortly.

      Matt
      View article »
    • Wed Jun 18th 11:46 AM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      More Alarmism Over MBIA
      This article by yet another apologist for MBIA ever so conveniently ignores that:

      1. the monoline industry as a whole is dying as previously lucrative customers such as New York, New York City, California and Florida now do not purchase monoline insurance at horribly inflated prices but instead now issue their bonds more cheaply on the full faith and credit of the issuer, just as the Federal Government does and

      2. that if MBI uses the 900 million it pledged as collateral to spin off a new entity Moody's and others are likely to downgrade MBIA two full notches or more, which would in fact be the end of MBI.

      View article »
    • Sun Jun 8th 09:41 AM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Research Zeitgeist: Bank Capitalization Concerns Heat Up
      Keep in mind however that these Fed facilities, unlike their BOE and European counterparts are only 30-day loans.

      A loan is not a gift.

      It must be repaid.

      View article »
    • Fri Jun 6th 20:16 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      MBIA and Ambac: Edge of the Cliff, Ratings-Wise
      By MBI's own admission in their last quarterly filing, new business was down 43%.

      California, New York, New Jersey, New York City and now Florida have all decided not to use monoline insurance anymore. That trend is growing rapidly. Those are huge clients.

      Soon all 50 states will simply issue bonds on their own full faith and credit just like the US government does.

      It's far cheaper that way.

      Monolines will default long before states do.

      Why does MBI refuse to give an open accounting of what's actually going on in their offshore subsidiaries? What are they trying to hide?
      View article »
    • Wed Jun 4th 10:10 AM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Muni Defaults Triple
      The amount of defaults in the muni market is sure to increase with the overreliance on the tender option bond market by municipalities for short-term financing.
      View article »
    • Thu May 1st 10:30 AM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Monolines' All-Important Debt Rating Threatened
      Well we also have the fact that new writing business has fallen off a cliff. Huge major clients such as New York, California and New Jersey have all decided that the fat fees charged by the monolines simply aren't worth it and these enormous customers are simply selling their new issues directly to market without using the insurers.

      All the wild rosy scenario projections for ABK and MBIA that they are touting are heavily based on revenue streams from new writings, but in actuality they have fallen off a cliff.

      Stay tuned.

      Not to mention the Tender Option market!

      Crash of 2008
      View article »
    • Thu Apr 10th 10:51 AM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      MBIA: Credit Where Credit Is Due
      I recommend you learn as much as you can about their subsidiaries, especially their offshore ones. This is where the time bombs are.
      View article »
    • Thu Apr 10th 10:42 AM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      MBIA: Credit Where Credit Is Due
      They are overleveraged, to the gills. "Book value" is an illusion, it is mark to model NOT mark to market.
      View article »
    • Tue Mar 18th 00:21 AM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Will Lehman Follow Bear into the Woods?
      This isn't going to be easy.

      I am filming a documentary entitled "The Crash of 2008". Portions of
      what will be used in parts of the film are now available at:

      www.youtube.com/user/C...

      I was a market maker in derivative securities and have read hundreds of
      research papers published by individual Federal Reserve branches. I
      found the most informative ones to be from Kansas City and Atlanta.

      Additionally, I have reviewed scores of research papers by various
      Federal Reserve branches prior to publication.

      Matt Dubuque
      The Crash of 2008
      View article »
    • Mon Mar 17th 23:32 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Fed's Strategy to Halt Debt Meltdown is Not Working
      I am filming a documentary entitled "The Crash of 2008". Portions of
      what will be used in parts of the film are now available at:

      www.youtube.com/user/C...

      I was a market maker in derivative securities and have read hundreds of
      research papers published by individual Federal Reserve branches. I
      found the most informative ones to be from Kansas City and Atlanta.

      Additionally, I have reviewed scores of research papers by various
      Federal Reserve branches prior to publication.

      Matt Dubuque
      The Crash of 2008


      View article »
    • Fri Mar 14th 19:01 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      Spitzer: The Monoline Angle
      Could you please inform the class how it is beneficial for new business growth of MBIA that New York, California and New Jersey announced last week that they will not be using bond insurance on their new municipal bond issues?

      How is that good for business?

      If MBIA is such a AAA stock, why are they forced to pay 15% on their newly issued debt? Isn't that the rate firms with terrible prospects are required to pay?

      Or do you know far more than those who would lend money to MBIA in the capital markets?

      Have you taken the time to read the 10K and the 10Q that MBIA recently filed with the SEC? You would serve yourself well to read both and attempt to understand them.

      These are what MBIA is saying about their prospects, not me!

      Why don't you read (and try to understand) what they are saying to the Feds (in the forms of their recent 10K and 10Q) under penalty of perjury?

      My, my.

      Oh well. Best of luck to you. Be sure to check back in a year!

      Matt
      View article »
    • Fri Mar 14th 16:47 PM | Rating: 0 0
      Commented on:
      The Municipal Bond Dilemma
      I see. This does sound like socialism however. Are you stating we are not allowed to disclose facts that California last week announced they will no longer use MBIA to insure their new muni issues? New Jersey has now followed suit. Are you claiming this will have no effect on their bottom line, or that because we live in a socialist society we should not be able to discuss that?

      Are you saying that because we live in a socialist society we are not allowed to short the stock?

      My, my.

      If MBIA is such a wonderful AAA company, why do they have to pay 15% to borrow money in the capital markets? That's junk bond rate and is what they borrowed money when they raised emergency capital in the debt markets earlier this year.

      Should that fact also be kept secret?

      Matt

      View article »
Contribute an Article Become a Seeking Alpha Contributor