marxbites

How Precious Is Silver?

Rebel my friend; it goes all the way back to monarchist big govt pro bank Hamilton and his fractional reserve shylocks of special UNGENERAL govt privilege; which fails the Gen'l Welfare AND Equal Protection clauses by leaps & bounds.

Jackson killed the 2nd BUS off and paid off America's debt the first and LAST time in our history. Only because our currency no longer cost taxpayers compounding interest for it's use, as the shylock Fed now charges. Prices were stable and American wealth accumulation was staedy and rising all the way to the CW. The exceptions were under high protective tarrifs - ie GOVT intervention.

After the taxes and fiat of the CW up until 1913 w/the FED & Inc Taxes enacted, was another period of almost true free markets free from govt and Americans flourished. The downfall actually began earlier when Big Biz finally got it's ICC to regulate fat profits while stomping out pesky little profit encroaching small competition.

What Americans dont understand is that BOTH parties long ago traded in maximum freedom Jefferson for massive govt Hamilton.

The proof for you idiot Republicans that still think our party is any much different than those commie coddling war mongering and profiteering Morgan Dems, is the incessant praise the likes of Newt or Trent Lott lavish on FDR, one of our most criminal presidents ever, right up there w/Lincoln, TR, Wilson & Bush's.

99% of Americans still believe the Govt is a net positive - it is not. Govts costs to humanity and civilisation far far far outweigh it's puny net benefits.

The same people behind the Fed & the Inc Tax are the same people that opened the New Republic to agitate against the Germans and entry into the war that Wilson got re-elected promising we'd never enter. The SAME people were behind FDR's confiscation of the people's gold and IT's presumed subsequent loss to the Fed as loan collateral.

Look what the Maestro said back in the day:

Alan Greenspan - “Gold and Economic Freedom” 1967
"An almost hysterical antagonism toward the gold standard is one issue which unites statists of all persuasions. They seem to sense – perhaps more clearly and subtly than many consistent defenders of laissez-faire – that gold and economic freedom are inseparable, that the gold standard is an instrument of laissez-faire and that each implies and requires the other. . . . This is the shabby secret of the welfare statists' tirades against gold. Deficit spending is simply a scheme for the confiscation of wealth. Gold stands in the way of this insidious process. It stands as a protector of property rights."

If This Comes True, You'll Be Glad You Own Gold & Silver

Dixie,

We need to chop Leviathan off at the thighs. Dems & Reps alike have proven they collude more often against us for themselves, than for we producers they feed off while themselves only consuming; producing nothing we would buy from it voluntarily.

If This Comes True, You'll Be Glad You Own Gold & Silver

I was just such a naysayer until I heard Cheney admit he'd kept his CFR directorship a secret as a legislator. Well indoctrinated me voted for W 2x. Well, that and W's lavishing Ted w/a 40% "education" Dept increase, instead of move towards free market education, propelled me into getting my own non-establishment biased education. As a liberal small govt fiscal conservative, I'd long ago decided the Dems were the socialist warmongers history confirms, but was deluded enough to think the Rep rhetoric was genuine. It wasn't. Indeed Lincoln was a commie socialist as hard as THAT is to believe. So the roots of the Republican party are pinker than the Dem progressive slide into it's own pinkdom. I've learned the two parties are controlled from the banking cabal that conspired to take away the people's real commodity market valued money in stages; the Morgan Dems & Rockefeller Reps.

But just wrap your mind around this from:
albensonjr.com/noconse...

//So lets take a brief look at the "conservative" roots of the Republican Party. When the Republican Party ran its first presidential candidate, John C. Fremont, back in 1856, Fremont had the backing of several men who were socialist refugees from the failed socialist/communist revolts in Europe in 1848. One of the most well-known of these was Friedrich Hassaurek, an Austrian socialist, who stumped the Midwest in Fremont's behalf. However it did little good at that point, as Fremont was beaten. However, it is worth noting that when the War of Northern Aggression broke out in 1861, General Fremont ended up with a goodly number of these forty-eighter socialists and communists on his military staff while the war was in progress. The Forty-eighter socialists seem to have flocked to Fremont. What did they know about the august general that our "history" books have not bothered to tell us?

Although Fremont was beaten in 1856, the socialists and communists were nothing if not patient. In 1860 they found another candidate worthy of their leftist support--Abraham Lincoln. So in the presidential campaign of 1860 the Forty-eighters all came out for Lincoln. Carl Wittke, author of Refugees of Revolution noted that: "Lincoln was fully aware of the political influence of the Forty-eighters in the campaign of 1860, in persuading many of their countrymen to desert the Democratic allegiance for the Republicans..." It appears that the Forty-eighters had quite a bit of influence in the Republican convention in 1860--even to helping write parts of the party's platform. So much for "conservatism" at the Republican roots!

Establishment historian James McPherson told us in his book Abraham Lincoln and the Second American Revolution that Mr. Lincoln had championed the cause of the socialists and communists in Europe in 1848, so why would he not embrace their unstinting support during his presidential aspirations in 1860? You can accurately label this scenario "the Red roots of the Republican Party."

If socialists and communists supported Fremont in 1856 and Lincoln in 1860 and 1864, we can hardly label the beginnings of the Republican Party as "conservative" now, can we? The roots of the Republican Party were anything but conservative--at best they could be considered deep pink. Our decent, patriotic folks in this country need to become aware of this so they will not be guilty of trying to take us all back to Republican "conservative" roots that do not and never did exist! It is true that the Republican Party did take a more conservative tack in the late 1940s and 50s, and even through the early 60s, but that was out of political necessity and it hardly reflects the real foundation and origins of the GOP.

It is interesting to note that, in 1860, the Democrats were the real conservatives, while the Republicans were the left-leaning radicals. People today should know the difference. The fact that most don't reveals the lack of depth in what most of us received in government schools that passed for education. Sadly, what most of us received was leftist propaganda that was paraded by us under the guise of "history." Sadly, in our day, nothing has changed and our people "still perish from lack of knowledge." //

Some mind blast eh?

Want more reality of the scam our govt is; the elites that bleed us dry who run it from the shadows, pulling the strings of the manipulatable fronts they put in office for the purpose? And the perpetual debt of perpetual wars for supposed peace?

This essay names the names, and connects the dots of the pure evil who have worked so hard in concert to take away the freedoms that some patriots once upon a time gave everything to give us.

Wall Street, Banks, and American Foreign Policy, by Murray N. Rothbard
mises.org/resources/12...

There is NO way the people's capital these criminals have squandered on themselves will ever be repaid to those who earned it. Our ONLY choice is to protect what little is left. Turn most of your paper assets into metals.

There is ZERO difference between the Warburg/Rothschild designed 2nd Reich's fiat monetary system, the very blueprint of our own FED, and the inevitable hyperinflation that results when tyrannts rob their people by coin clipping, debasement; or by printing press fiat, once they've fooled the masses into reliquishing their REAL money in exchange for unbacked money debt receipts printed from thin air. Called money because the govt says so. Boy are we stupid.

Ron Paul is dead right. He is also the only Pol I've seen in the 40 years I've paid attention, that truly upholds his solemn oath defending the constitution that no others even come close to.