Maybe we should pat them on the back as they are led away in handcuffs!
On Mar 16 06:00 PM betweenthenumbers wrote:
> Great info, and a surprisingly easy and interesting read. It does > read very much like a threatening legal letter, but with much more > accessible prose (nothing new about having to talk down to politicians). > > > One interesting note: one of the most stupid things AIG did was make > bad bets backed by its AAA rating, with special provisions to allow > the buyer of AIG derivatives to receive immediate payment/collateral > were a ratings downgrade to occur (it was considered an "event of > default"), though no actual losses need be booked. This set AIG up > for the mother of all liquidity squeezes, because suddenly these > special provisions became due on "1.6T in notional derivative exposure". > AIG was essentially writing CDS *ON ITSELF*, meaning if AIG had any > credit issues, then AIG is the counterparty that would have to pay > you. Dead on arrival by any measure, yet AIG sung it to the tune > of hundreds of billions in losses. > > People keep saying that the AIGFP division doesn't deserve their > $175MM bonuses, but I disagree. This robbery is so complex and well-executed > that the characters from Ocean's Eleven would be looking for pointers, > and I think we (taxpayers of USA) should reward a job well done.
-
Maybe we should pat them on the back as they are led away in handcuffs!
Mar 17 00:26 am
|Rating:
+3
-1
All Comments by BM1087 »AIG's Blackmail Note [View article]
On Mar 16 06:00 PM betweenthenumbers wrote:
> Great info, and a surprisingly easy and interesting read. It does
> read very much like a threatening legal letter, but with much more
> accessible prose (nothing new about having to talk down to politicians).
>
>
> One interesting note: one of the most stupid things AIG did was make
> bad bets backed by its AAA rating, with special provisions to allow
> the buyer of AIG derivatives to receive immediate payment/collateral
> were a ratings downgrade to occur (it was considered an "event of
> default"), though no actual losses need be booked. This set AIG up
> for the mother of all liquidity squeezes, because suddenly these
> special provisions became due on "1.6T in notional derivative exposure".
> AIG was essentially writing CDS *ON ITSELF*, meaning if AIG had any
> credit issues, then AIG is the counterparty that would have to pay
> you. Dead on arrival by any measure, yet AIG sung it to the tune
> of hundreds of billions in losses.
>
> People keep saying that the AIGFP division doesn't deserve their
> $175MM bonuses, but I disagree. This robbery is so complex and well-executed
> that the characters from Ocean's Eleven would be looking for pointers,
> and I think we (taxpayers of USA) should reward a job well done.