One word - lobbyists look at how even Obama is in the tank for corn ethanol...dismissing the idea of doing away with the 54 cent tariff on cane ethanol...
On Nov 13 08:54 AM Subsidy Eye wrote:
> John, if sweet sorghum is such a great idea, then why are 99% of > the existing ethanol plants based on corn? Surely a company like > ADM or VSE would have not been dumb enough to have overlooked the > biofuel equivalent of money lying on the table.
When it comes to the US auto industry I don't get the manufacturers...we have all known for years that oil would be a diminishing resource...today we have a terrible bio-fuel program and auto makers are still making gas only engines and the govt has not put into play the design of an infrastructure for re-new able energy. We are so far behind the curve and it's not just the auto industry. Brazil is currently selling more cane based ethanol than gasoline - oh yeah - that's because GM supplies most of the E85 vehicles...and they use sugar [non protein] for ethanol and they have a complete system to get ethanol to the consumers. [seen any E85 stations in your area - not mine] Yes - SUVs as they are configured today will become a relic... but we have problems bigger than an SUV to now fix...
The Future of Ethanol [View article]
look at how even Obama is in the tank for corn ethanol...dismissing the idea of doing away with the 54 cent tariff on cane ethanol...
On Nov 13 08:54 AM Subsidy Eye wrote:
> John, if sweet sorghum is such a great idea, then why are 99% of
> the existing ethanol plants based on corn? Surely a company like
> ADM or VSE would have not been dumb enough to have overlooked the
> biofuel equivalent of money lying on the table.
Death of the SUV [View article]
ethanol to the consumers. [seen any E85 stations in your area - not mine] Yes - SUVs as they are configured today will become a relic...
but we have problems bigger than an SUV to now fix...