Fund Managers to Fight Short Selling Disclosure Rules [View article]
So what your basically saying is that if they have to make their short position public they will no longer have the ability to control the market and will affect their profits since it would level the playing field and put them at the same status as the rest of us. What a sham of an article.
Inflation Remains Beyond Our Horizon to Predict [View article]
How anyone can say this current economic crisis could not be forecast/predicted is unbelievable. Even an economics 101 student understands he cannot continue borrowing and buying without paying back what is borrowed. And he cant obtain the money to pay back if he does not have a job that makes more than it takes to pay basic living expenses. Ours is not only a debt driven economy but also a tax supported economy. Continuous offshoring, corporate consolidation, merging, tax breaks for the wealthy and corporations, stagnant/rretreating wages, the cap on income earned and social security, the loss of our industrial base and the last 20 years excesses have destroyed that government revenue source. Our Feds know what they are doing? Did they really think that we would never have to pay borrowed money back, that with our nukes we can hold the world hostage to our debts. Apparently they currently think that this supposedly increasing of 'liquidity' by the bail out is going to increase more borrowing when all its really doing is 'giving' no strings reserves to the very top of this ponzi fraud we call our banking system in order to protect a few from losing at the expense of the many. There is no increase in money velocity when the money being pumped into the banking system is being held to pay their way out of their bad investments or given as bonuses to the CEO's. All the economic theory's and models cannot take into account the massive fraud, corruption and theft that has been perpetuated on our current fiat system. The difference between a fiat system and a hard backed monetary system is that when the abuses start on the latter it immediately causes your deflation's, inflation's, recessions's and depression's which have historically occurred very rapidly when there was any tipping of the balance's. The very proud pointing to the 'stability' of our current system, which has really had only a short lifespan, has worked until now. Under our current system we have managed to slowly ease into whatever is coming over the last 30 years which seems to be the period that all of the checks and balances, which our system was based on, were removed. You state that the feds are taking actions that they would have taken if they had been there in 1929. Well were we not under the gold standard then? Every 'expert' I read has a different outlook on whats coming and they are all seem to be grasping for answers or trying to steer a direction with their words. The only consensus is, it's new, it's probably bad and it going to be big. I have to agree, I would not believe any long term forecast's.
Sort by:
Latest | Highest ratedFund Managers to Fight Short Selling Disclosure Rules [View article]
Inflation Remains Beyond Our Horizon to Predict [View article]
Apparently they currently think that this supposedly increasing of 'liquidity' by the bail out is going to increase more borrowing when all its really doing is 'giving' no strings reserves to the very top of this ponzi fraud we call our banking system in order to protect a few from losing at the expense of the many. There is no increase in money velocity when the money being pumped into the banking system is being held to pay their way out of their bad investments or given as bonuses to the CEO's. All the economic theory's and models cannot take into account the massive fraud, corruption and theft that has been perpetuated on our current fiat system. The difference between a fiat system and a hard backed monetary system is that when the abuses start on the latter it immediately causes your deflation's, inflation's, recessions's and depression's which have historically occurred very rapidly when there was any tipping of the balance's. The very proud pointing to the 'stability' of our current system, which has really had only a short lifespan, has worked until now. Under our current system we have managed to slowly ease into whatever is coming over the last 30 years which seems to be the period that all of the checks and balances, which our system was based on, were removed.
You state that the feds are taking actions that they would have taken if they had been there in 1929. Well were we not under the gold standard then? Every 'expert' I read has a different outlook on whats coming and they are all seem to be grasping for answers or trying to steer a direction with their words. The only consensus is, it's new, it's probably bad and it going to be big. I have to agree, I would not believe any long term forecast's.