connorport's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com http://seekingalpha.comuser/169059/comments http://seekingalpha.com/article/176548-rbc-on-sirius-past-present-future?source=feed#comment-792508 792508

On Dec 06 09:39 AM connorport wrote:

> Great stuff!! Tell me how you don't see a parallel action on this
> stock like what we saw out of ETFC. It trailed below a dollar forever
> and when it popped it popped and stayed. SIRI is closer to profits
> than ETFC. Twice the shares but twice the revs if you look with
> SIRI inching ahead slightly towards green on the books.]]> Sun, 06 Dec 2009 09:40:08 -0500

On Dec 06 09:39 AM connorport wrote:

> Great stuff!! Tell me how you don't see a parallel action on this
> stock like what we saw out of ETFC. It trailed below a dollar forever
> and when it popped it popped and stayed. SIRI is closer to profits
> than ETFC. Twice the shares but twice the revs if you look with
> SIRI inching ahead slightly towards green on the books.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/176548-rbc-on-sirius-past-present-future?source=feed#comment-792506 792506

On Dec 05 08:11 PM Mr. Stupid wrote:

> From Mel - "hey guys (board) I just read a blog with posts from this
> experienced investor name Jerrold." He says we should do a reverse
> split immediately. "Did any of you hear about this and why not. You
> guys (board) better get on top of things and start reading those
> blogs." "Jerrold demands we do this now so get on top of this and
> get 'er done."
>
> From Board Member - "Man, why didn't we think of this before Jerrold."
>
>
> ROFL]]> Sun, 06 Dec 2009 09:39:05 -0500

On Dec 05 08:11 PM Mr. Stupid wrote:

> From Mel - "hey guys (board) I just read a blog with posts from this
> experienced investor name Jerrold." He says we should do a reverse
> split immediately. "Did any of you hear about this and why not. You
> guys (board) better get on top of things and start reading those
> blogs." "Jerrold demands we do this now so get on top of this and
> get 'er done."
>
> From Board Member - "Man, why didn't we think of this before Jerrold."
>
>
> ROFL]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/176548-rbc-on-sirius-past-present-future?source=feed#comment-792502 792502

On Dec 06 08:41 AM Jerrold Williams wrote:

> Ok, stupid. You have earned your name once again, Monkey!. Why
> would I have a debate or try to prove something to someone who calls
> himself Mr. Stupid?. If someone who calls himself stupid agrees
> with me. What would that make me? I will educate yo for the last
> time...be thankful:
> Ok...I delightfully disagree with everything you say, stupid. Every
> interviewer, every analyst, the board has already approved the R/S
> months ago. Even Mel K said he would do the R/S when necessary.
> He says he isn't doing it now, just on principle. He says 10 $1.00
> bills is the same as a $10.00 bill. He is on a power trip and doesn't
> like to follow rules. He never said it would be bad for the company.
> In fact he always says the reason SIRI is penny stock is because
> of 3.9 billion shares. So, it is just a matter of timing. My issue
> is that they are putting off something that is inevitable for unexplainable
> reasons. So your point making it seem like I am the only one talking
> about a R/S is STUPID. Watch every interview he does...It always
> comes up!! If doing a R/S is "bad business", is it your point that
> having a penny stock "good business"? If you could read prior posts
> on this board, you would have read the many examples of companies
> that have done a R/S in the past and it was not a bad thing for them
> , it actually worked out great. A R/S is usually a bad thing when
> companies with a small market cap do it for the sole reason of staying
> listed, their company are losing value causing the stock to be
> a penny stock SIRI is a penny stock due to dillution of shares...
> These other companies aren't worth 2.4 billion dollars and have 3.9
> billion shares! I have said many times, why I feel it should be
> done promptly. I realize you are stupid as your name states. Get
> your Mom, Mrs stupid to help you research my prior posts. If stupid
> people like you ever agreed with me. I'd probably jump off a bridge.
> You are not on my level in any way....In fact I am disgusted by having
> to even respond to the likes of you. I am sick to my stomach! Your
> other comments are not worth responding to. You have now been educated
> by greatness. However, I feel you will remain stupid. It is probably
> hereditary. I would hate to meet your Mom, Mrs Stupid. Go ahead
> monkey. Prove how stupid you are with your next ignorant post like
> SIRI should file bankruptcy now instead of a R/S...
> PS...save the lol, ROFL, and all that teenage text message stuff
> for your friends at school. As far as me being a teenager, Ok...if
> a stupid person or a retard thinks that way, so be it. I am what
> you say I am. You are what you say you are! Be grateful that I
> blessed you with a reply, that is my last reply to the stupid people
> of the world.....Please, no one reference my name in the same sentence
> as this man.. I would appreciate that....
>
> R/S ASAP to take this company to the next level in 2010!]]> Sun, 06 Dec 2009 09:34:19 -0500

On Dec 06 08:41 AM Jerrold Williams wrote:

> Ok, stupid. You have earned your name once again, Monkey!. Why
> would I have a debate or try to prove something to someone who calls
> himself Mr. Stupid?. If someone who calls himself stupid agrees
> with me. What would that make me? I will educate yo for the last
> time...be thankful:
> Ok...I delightfully disagree with everything you say, stupid. Every
> interviewer, every analyst, the board has already approved the R/S
> months ago. Even Mel K said he would do the R/S when necessary.
> He says he isn't doing it now, just on principle. He says 10 $1.00
> bills is the same as a $10.00 bill. He is on a power trip and doesn't
> like to follow rules. He never said it would be bad for the company.
> In fact he always says the reason SIRI is penny stock is because
> of 3.9 billion shares. So, it is just a matter of timing. My issue
> is that they are putting off something that is inevitable for unexplainable
> reasons. So your point making it seem like I am the only one talking
> about a R/S is STUPID. Watch every interview he does...It always
> comes up!! If doing a R/S is "bad business", is it your point that
> having a penny stock "good business"? If you could read prior posts
> on this board, you would have read the many examples of companies
> that have done a R/S in the past and it was not a bad thing for them
> , it actually worked out great. A R/S is usually a bad thing when
> companies with a small market cap do it for the sole reason of staying
> listed, their company are losing value causing the stock to be
> a penny stock SIRI is a penny stock due to dillution of shares...
> These other companies aren't worth 2.4 billion dollars and have 3.9
> billion shares! I have said many times, why I feel it should be
> done promptly. I realize you are stupid as your name states. Get
> your Mom, Mrs stupid to help you research my prior posts. If stupid
> people like you ever agreed with me. I'd probably jump off a bridge.
> You are not on my level in any way....In fact I am disgusted by having
> to even respond to the likes of you. I am sick to my stomach! Your
> other comments are not worth responding to. You have now been educated
> by greatness. However, I feel you will remain stupid. It is probably
> hereditary. I would hate to meet your Mom, Mrs Stupid. Go ahead
> monkey. Prove how stupid you are with your next ignorant post like
> SIRI should file bankruptcy now instead of a R/S...
> PS...save the lol, ROFL, and all that teenage text message stuff
> for your friends at school. As far as me being a teenager, Ok...if
> a stupid person or a retard thinks that way, so be it. I am what
> you say I am. You are what you say you are! Be grateful that I
> blessed you with a reply, that is my last reply to the stupid people
> of the world.....Please, no one reference my name in the same sentence
> as this man.. I would appreciate that....
>
> R/S ASAP to take this company to the next level in 2010!]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/176548-rbc-on-sirius-past-present-future?source=feed#comment-791785 791785

On Dec 05 12:25 PM Mr. Stupid wrote:

> If management was smart they would have just gone ahead and filed
> bankruptsy.
>
> BK would have been better for this company since it would have shed
> most all of its debt and let them start out on new tread.
>
> Sometimes BK is the best alternative and I'm really starting to
> think they should just go ahead and do it now to get the monkey off
> their back.
>
> Mr. Stupid]]> Sat, 05 Dec 2009 13:31:17 -0500

On Dec 05 12:25 PM Mr. Stupid wrote:

> If management was smart they would have just gone ahead and filed
> bankruptsy.
>
> BK would have been better for this company since it would have shed
> most all of its debt and let them start out on new tread.
>
> Sometimes BK is the best alternative and I'm really starting to
> think they should just go ahead and do it now to get the monkey off
> their back.
>
> Mr. Stupid]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/176548-rbc-on-sirius-past-present-future?source=feed#comment-791780 791780

On Dec 05 01:05 PM Pell wrote:

> Connorport and others who don't believe the R/S is needed now. As
> the March deadline looms (even though it can be extended) negativity
> and the dilution will win out. Plus they have to make a move by June
> 2010 to either pay back Malone (Which would be a waste of over a
> billion dollars. Pay back debt if they have that much positive cash
> flow) or convert his shares to common stock. How that can be accomplished
> I don't know. Do they issue more shares since they are already authorized
> to due therefore diluting value more? Or do they just allow Malone
> and Liberty to buy them out, hopefully at a premium which would be
> my guess.
>
> So my point is simple there are 2 deadlines looming and although
> the 4Q numbers will be good it will not be sufficient enough to fight
> off the negativity that can be created and of course the continued
> fight between the long investors and the daytraders and HFT. why
> wait and risk further damage.
>
> These are hard facts that cannot be questioned.
>
> Mel knows it when he covers his butt playing both sides (Dilution
> is hurting pps and no R/S), the Board knows it, Malone knows it and
> the pro analyst know it.
>
> What is the arguement? Its fact versus fiction]]> Sat, 05 Dec 2009 13:28:05 -0500

On Dec 05 01:05 PM Pell wrote:

> Connorport and others who don't believe the R/S is needed now. As
> the March deadline looms (even though it can be extended) negativity
> and the dilution will win out. Plus they have to make a move by June
> 2010 to either pay back Malone (Which would be a waste of over a
> billion dollars. Pay back debt if they have that much positive cash
> flow) or convert his shares to common stock. How that can be accomplished
> I don't know. Do they issue more shares since they are already authorized
> to due therefore diluting value more? Or do they just allow Malone
> and Liberty to buy them out, hopefully at a premium which would be
> my guess.
>
> So my point is simple there are 2 deadlines looming and although
> the 4Q numbers will be good it will not be sufficient enough to fight
> off the negativity that can be created and of course the continued
> fight between the long investors and the daytraders and HFT. why
> wait and risk further damage.
>
> These are hard facts that cannot be questioned.
>
> Mel knows it when he covers his butt playing both sides (Dilution
> is hurting pps and no R/S), the Board knows it, Malone knows it and
> the pro analyst know it.
>
> What is the arguement? Its fact versus fiction]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/176548-rbc-on-sirius-past-present-future?source=feed#comment-791765 791765

On Dec 05 12:38 PM Mr. Stupid wrote:

> why would anyone listen to anyone that has an avatar of a person
> holding a gun to their head? MMMMMMMM
>
> ROFL]]> Sat, 05 Dec 2009 13:20:47 -0500

On Dec 05 12:38 PM Mr. Stupid wrote:

> why would anyone listen to anyone that has an avatar of a person
> holding a gun to their head? MMMMMMMM
>
> ROFL]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/176548-rbc-on-sirius-past-present-future?source=feed#comment-791764 791764

On Dec 05 01:05 PM Pell wrote:

> Connorport and others who don't believe the R/S is needed now. As
> the March deadline looms (even though it can be extended) negativity
> and the dilution will win out. Plus they have to make a move by June
> 2010 to either pay back Malone (Which would be a waste of over a
> billion dollars. Pay back debt if they have that much positive cash
> flow) or convert his shares to common stock. How that can be accomplished
> I don't know. Do they issue more shares since they are already authorized
> to due therefore diluting value more? Or do they just allow Malone
> and Liberty to buy them out, hopefully at a premium which would be
> my guess.
>
> So my point is simple there are 2 deadlines looming and although
> the 4Q numbers will be good it will not be sufficient enough to fight
> off the negativity that can be created and of course the continued
> fight between the long investors and the daytraders and HFT. why
> wait and risk further damage.
>
> These are hard facts that cannot be questioned.
>
> Mel knows it when he covers his butt playing both sides (Dilution
> is hurting pps and no R/S), the Board knows it, Malone knows it and
> the pro analyst know it.
>
> What is the arguement? Its fact versus fiction]]> Sat, 05 Dec 2009 13:20:06 -0500

On Dec 05 01:05 PM Pell wrote:

> Connorport and others who don't believe the R/S is needed now. As
> the March deadline looms (even though it can be extended) negativity
> and the dilution will win out. Plus they have to make a move by June
> 2010 to either pay back Malone (Which would be a waste of over a
> billion dollars. Pay back debt if they have that much positive cash
> flow) or convert his shares to common stock. How that can be accomplished
> I don't know. Do they issue more shares since they are already authorized
> to due therefore diluting value more? Or do they just allow Malone
> and Liberty to buy them out, hopefully at a premium which would be
> my guess.
>
> So my point is simple there are 2 deadlines looming and although
> the 4Q numbers will be good it will not be sufficient enough to fight
> off the negativity that can be created and of course the continued
> fight between the long investors and the daytraders and HFT. why
> wait and risk further damage.
>
> These are hard facts that cannot be questioned.
>
> Mel knows it when he covers his butt playing both sides (Dilution
> is hurting pps and no R/S), the Board knows it, Malone knows it and
> the pro analyst know it.
>
> What is the arguement? Its fact versus fiction]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/176548-rbc-on-sirius-past-present-future?source=feed#comment-791667 791667 Sat, 05 Dec 2009 11:19:30 -0500 http://seekingalpha.com/article/176548-rbc-on-sirius-past-present-future?source=feed#comment-791659 791659 kaufman.senate.gov/pre... ]]> Sat, 05 Dec 2009 11:11:27 -0500 kaufman.senate.gov/pre... ]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/176548-rbc-on-sirius-past-present-future?source=feed#comment-791617 791617

On Dec 04 08:42 PM Jerrold Williams wrote:

> lol...If you are going to comment on peoples' intelligence...At least
> spell the word "intelligent" right!! For that you deserve an insult,
> Never come to this blog again idiot!!!
>
> unintellegent:correct spelling is unintelligent....What a jerk!
> I'm disgusted by your existence! Use spell check Mr.. Intellect
> !
>
> Ok, I made childish comments....Do I sound "unintellegent"..?
> lol....
>
> Demand the R/S!!!! Help reduce stupidity in America!!!]]> Sat, 05 Dec 2009 10:22:28 -0500

On Dec 04 08:42 PM Jerrold Williams wrote:

> lol...If you are going to comment on peoples' intelligence...At least
> spell the word "intelligent" right!! For that you deserve an insult,
> Never come to this blog again idiot!!!
>
> unintellegent:correct spelling is unintelligent....What a jerk!
> I'm disgusted by your existence! Use spell check Mr.. Intellect
> !
>
> Ok, I made childish comments....Do I sound "unintellegent"..?
> lol....
>
> Demand the R/S!!!! Help reduce stupidity in America!!!]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/176548-rbc-on-sirius-past-present-future?source=feed#comment-790210 790210

On Dec 04 09:55 AM fwi wrote:

> There is some good research out there which shows that reverse stock
> splits do not bode well for the continuing rise in the price of the
> shares. My thought is that managements see the "higher" price and
> get a bit complacent. From what I read in the article, it sounds
> like Sirius' manangement is determined to grow the share price without
> doing the reverse split, wanting to get the price up the old fashioned
> way. This is most heartening. And the current volatility in the price
> of the stock is a good thing, giving the longs more opportunities
> to buy.
>
> The only thing teenagers and up want for Christmas this year is electronics
> enhancements. I think SIRI is in the sweet spot. A very cheap gift
> that keeps on giving. SIRI stock in every stocking.]]> Fri, 04 Dec 2009 10:04:32 -0500

On Dec 04 09:55 AM fwi wrote:

> There is some good research out there which shows that reverse stock
> splits do not bode well for the continuing rise in the price of the
> shares. My thought is that managements see the "higher" price and
> get a bit complacent. From what I read in the article, it sounds
> like Sirius' manangement is determined to grow the share price without
> doing the reverse split, wanting to get the price up the old fashioned
> way. This is most heartening. And the current volatility in the price
> of the stock is a good thing, giving the longs more opportunities
> to buy.
>
> The only thing teenagers and up want for Christmas this year is electronics
> enhancements. I think SIRI is in the sweet spot. A very cheap gift
> that keeps on giving. SIRI stock in every stocking.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/176548-rbc-on-sirius-past-present-future?source=feed#comment-790194 790194 Fri, 04 Dec 2009 09:57:50 -0500 http://seekingalpha.com/article/176548-rbc-on-sirius-past-present-future?source=feed#comment-790186 790186

On Dec 04 09:24 AM Pell wrote:

> Jerrold,
>
> I finally came to the conclusion that RAF and the others who do not
> understand the importance of a R/S now do so because they probably
> bought high prior to merger.
>
> A R/S would be terrible for them. For those who had the sense to
> wait until after the merger or those who continued to buy to offset
> our pps cost know the R/S will not affect us.
>
> I for one waited to after the merger to buy. I do admit to selling
> a bunch of shares at $ .69 several months ago that had an average
> price of about $ .25 but then a loaded up after the price fell again
> to around $. 52. So its all profit for me and I still understand
> the R/S is necessary.
>
> I am holding this stock because I believe after the R/S, institutional
> investors and future quarterly numbers will take this stock to much
> higher pps levels. How many times could regular guys like us own
> a few thousand shares in a stock trading $15 or $20 a share after
> the R/S settles in and future earning support that value.]]> Fri, 04 Dec 2009 09:55:43 -0500

On Dec 04 09:24 AM Pell wrote:

> Jerrold,
>
> I finally came to the conclusion that RAF and the others who do not
> understand the importance of a R/S now do so because they probably
> bought high prior to merger.
>
> A R/S would be terrible for them. For those who had the sense to
> wait until after the merger or those who continued to buy to offset
> our pps cost know the R/S will not affect us.
>
> I for one waited to after the merger to buy. I do admit to selling
> a bunch of shares at $ .69 several months ago that had an average
> price of about $ .25 but then a loaded up after the price fell again
> to around $. 52. So its all profit for me and I still understand
> the R/S is necessary.
>
> I am holding this stock because I believe after the R/S, institutional
> investors and future quarterly numbers will take this stock to much
> higher pps levels. How many times could regular guys like us own
> a few thousand shares in a stock trading $15 or $20 a share after
> the R/S settles in and future earning support that value.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/175896-janco-partners-arenson-resumes-sirius-coverage-discusses-pros-and-cons?source=feed#comment-788765 788765

On Dec 03 11:19 AM I'm Not Jim Cramer wrote:

> I haven't posted in soooooo long, but I still stop back once in a
> while to see what's going on. I see the conspiracy theorists are
> still running the show. It seems almost quaint! LOL I got out of
> trading Sirius when it became a "normal" stock a couple of months
> ago. I'm a trader, and there simply isn't enough movement in the
> stock to interest me anymore.
> Still, here's the number one problem for the stock, the huge abundance
> of shares. Nothing good will happen to the stock until that is solved.
>
> In my opinion Mel should have taken his lumps in the up market of
> this year, rather than the down market coming for 2010.
> I'm guessing this company will struggle to reach for $1.00 until
> March, and do the reverse then, because it won't make it. Congrats
> to everybody who made a ton of money this year in the stock, but
> don't be foolish. Buy puts now to cover what's going to happen next
> year, while the VIX is low and the cost cheap. Good luck!]]> Thu, 03 Dec 2009 13:30:37 -0500

On Dec 03 11:19 AM I'm Not Jim Cramer wrote:

> I haven't posted in soooooo long, but I still stop back once in a
> while to see what's going on. I see the conspiracy theorists are
> still running the show. It seems almost quaint! LOL I got out of
> trading Sirius when it became a "normal" stock a couple of months
> ago. I'm a trader, and there simply isn't enough movement in the
> stock to interest me anymore.
> Still, here's the number one problem for the stock, the huge abundance
> of shares. Nothing good will happen to the stock until that is solved.
>
> In my opinion Mel should have taken his lumps in the up market of
> this year, rather than the down market coming for 2010.
> I'm guessing this company will struggle to reach for $1.00 until
> March, and do the reverse then, because it won't make it. Congrats
> to everybody who made a ton of money this year in the stock, but
> don't be foolish. Buy puts now to cover what's going to happen next
> year, while the VIX is low and the cost cheap. Good luck!]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/175896-janco-partners-arenson-resumes-sirius-coverage-discusses-pros-and-cons?source=feed#comment-787121 787121

On Dec 02 04:28 PM R A F wrote:

> More site pollution from the usual gang of idiots: Pell/Jerrold/Stupid
>
>
> Check the inordinate number or comments - all inane - from this group
> (or one in the same) loser(s). Saying basically the same thing over
> and over, daily since the rally in SIRI began several months ago.
>
>
> Fearmongering anyone? Keep trying - maybe there is someone out there
> who will actually fall for your BS.]]> Wed, 02 Dec 2009 16:52:43 -0500

On Dec 02 04:28 PM R A F wrote:

> More site pollution from the usual gang of idiots: Pell/Jerrold/Stupid
>
>
> Check the inordinate number or comments - all inane - from this group
> (or one in the same) loser(s). Saying basically the same thing over
> and over, daily since the rally in SIRI began several months ago.
>
>
> Fearmongering anyone? Keep trying - maybe there is someone out there
> who will actually fall for your BS.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/175896-janco-partners-arenson-resumes-sirius-coverage-discusses-pros-and-cons?source=feed#comment-786087 786087

On Dec 02 08:32 AM Jerrold Williams wrote:

> I sense the old "bait and switch" . Huge volume after hours and people
> are getting happy. The manipulators want fresh meat to invest on
> the illusion of an increase in price. Look for it to dip down back
> to .63 or lower by the end of the day as big boys take profit. Big
> boys are playing a dirty game to rip off retail investors. Be very
> careful before you invest when s/p is going up suspiciously after
> hours for no apparent reason. It is too easy for big boys to produce
> a false price increase with this penny stock....This stock does not
> trade on technical strength...It trades on manipulators strength....Hmmmm..wonder
> why Mel K is fighting SEC to keep this a penny stock....I think I
> just nailed it....He can make a lot more money helping manipulators
> than getting stock price up......It is sickening!!!
> Mel K says no r/s when it is inevitable, he talks about global satellite
> when the company is in debt up to Mars...., then s/p goes up after
> hours with no realistic news......all signs pointing to a scheme
> to make a quick additional 2-3% in a day off retail investors....It's
> is SICKENING!!! Add that to that flash trading and millions are being
> leeched off retail investors!!
>
> Join ther Revolution!!! Fight for Reverse split!!!
>
> End the leeching of the middle class retail investor!!
>
> Watch this dip back to .63 by end of the day....like clockwork..
>
>
> Watch for paid bloggers to dispute my claim.......then watch the
> facts...numbers don't lie.....63 by end of day....or by end of week.......]]> Wed, 02 Dec 2009 08:46:51 -0500

On Dec 02 08:32 AM Jerrold Williams wrote:

> I sense the old "bait and switch" . Huge volume after hours and people
> are getting happy. The manipulators want fresh meat to invest on
> the illusion of an increase in price. Look for it to dip down back
> to .63 or lower by the end of the day as big boys take profit. Big
> boys are playing a dirty game to rip off retail investors. Be very
> careful before you invest when s/p is going up suspiciously after
> hours for no apparent reason. It is too easy for big boys to produce
> a false price increase with this penny stock....This stock does not
> trade on technical strength...It trades on manipulators strength....Hmmmm..wonder
> why Mel K is fighting SEC to keep this a penny stock....I think I
> just nailed it....He can make a lot more money helping manipulators
> than getting stock price up......It is sickening!!!
> Mel K says no r/s when it is inevitable, he talks about global satellite
> when the company is in debt up to Mars...., then s/p goes up after
> hours with no realistic news......all signs pointing to a scheme
> to make a quick additional 2-3% in a day off retail investors....It's
> is SICKENING!!! Add that to that flash trading and millions are being
> leeched off retail investors!!
>
> Join ther Revolution!!! Fight for Reverse split!!!
>
> End the leeching of the middle class retail investor!!
>
> Watch this dip back to .63 by end of the day....like clockwork..
>
>
> Watch for paid bloggers to dispute my claim.......then watch the
> facts...numbers don't lie.....63 by end of day....or by end of week.......]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/175896-janco-partners-arenson-resumes-sirius-coverage-discusses-pros-and-cons?source=feed#comment-785018 785018

On Dec 01 03:00 PM Pell wrote:

> Love your comments Connorport but you are wrong on this one. This
> stock cannot grow with the R/S. We need long term institutional investors.
> The stock will continue to be manipulated no matter what 4Q says.
>
>
> At this point we only risk SIRXM not hitting the mark on estimates.
> The pros will no longer estimate low on this stock for all the reasons
> you mention. Therefore it becomes a risk of SIRIXM not hitting the
> mark.
>
> We are riding a high on news, its time to make the move.]]> Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:56:05 -0500

On Dec 01 03:00 PM Pell wrote:

> Love your comments Connorport but you are wrong on this one. This
> stock cannot grow with the R/S. We need long term institutional investors.
> The stock will continue to be manipulated no matter what 4Q says.
>
>
> At this point we only risk SIRXM not hitting the mark on estimates.
> The pros will no longer estimate low on this stock for all the reasons
> you mention. Therefore it becomes a risk of SIRIXM not hitting the
> mark.
>
> We are riding a high on news, its time to make the move.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/175896-janco-partners-arenson-resumes-sirius-coverage-discusses-pros-and-cons?source=feed#comment-784873 784873 Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:59:33 -0500 http://seekingalpha.com/article/175896-janco-partners-arenson-resumes-sirius-coverage-discusses-pros-and-cons?source=feed#comment-784871 784871

On Dec 01 02:12 PM Pell wrote:

> Jerrold and Connorport it is sooo simple its funny.
>
> But I made my opinion known to Seeking Alpha and E-Trade that these
> sites are not the place for PAID OPINIONS!
>
> The R/S will happen as I predicted for months.
>
> The Board cannot wait any longer.
>
> How many times can we make Satwaves, RAF and the rest of the cronies
> look foolish.]]> Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:58:15 -0500

On Dec 01 02:12 PM Pell wrote:

> Jerrold and Connorport it is sooo simple its funny.
>
> But I made my opinion known to Seeking Alpha and E-Trade that these
> sites are not the place for PAID OPINIONS!
>
> The R/S will happen as I predicted for months.
>
> The Board cannot wait any longer.
>
> How many times can we make Satwaves, RAF and the rest of the cronies
> look foolish.]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/175896-janco-partners-arenson-resumes-sirius-coverage-discusses-pros-and-cons?source=feed#comment-784867 784867 Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:54:20 -0500 http://seekingalpha.com/article/175897-sirius-xm-s-karmazin-speaks-out-against-reverse-split?source=feed#comment-784797 784797

On Dec 01 01:52 PM Pell wrote:

> "Karmazin pointed to the fact that Sirius XM Radio (SIRI) remains
> a highly valued company despite its low share price, which he attributed
> only to the large number of shares outstanding. Most companies that
> perform reverse stock splits to maintain listing requirements have
> little to no value to begin with. A reverse split does not change
> that fact. Sirius XM, on the other hand, commands a market value
> of nearly $2.5 billion. Likewise, a reverse split would not change
> the overall value of the company."
>
> Again RAF and the rest of the paid bloggers the above is your boys
> words. Sound again like somebody you know?
>
> Mel can't fight it. He could if legislation helped against HFT but
> that will not happen anytime soon.
>
> Once again PELL was RIGHT!]]> Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:08:00 -0500

On Dec 01 01:52 PM Pell wrote:

> "Karmazin pointed to the fact that Sirius XM Radio (SIRI) remains
> a highly valued company despite its low share price, which he attributed
> only to the large number of shares outstanding. Most companies that
> perform reverse stock splits to maintain listing requirements have
> little to no value to begin with. A reverse split does not change
> that fact. Sirius XM, on the other hand, commands a market value
> of nearly $2.5 billion. Likewise, a reverse split would not change
> the overall value of the company."
>
> Again RAF and the rest of the paid bloggers the above is your boys
> words. Sound again like somebody you know?
>
> Mel can't fight it. He could if legislation helped against HFT but
> that will not happen anytime soon.
>
> Once again PELL was RIGHT!]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/175896-janco-partners-arenson-resumes-sirius-coverage-discusses-pros-and-cons?source=feed#comment-784672 784672

On Dec 01 12:22 PM Jerrold Williams wrote:

> Thanks for the intro Scotterpod...Let me give everyone some insight.
>
> First,
> Senior Analyst Murray Arenson has a price target of $.80. SIRIUS
> XM needs to get their share price over $1.00 by March 15, 2010. Therefore
> Mr. Arenson is indirectly predicting a reverse split. As far as "not
> anytime soon", well not within the next month...That is agreed, but
> it will be done within the next 4 months. As far as Mel Karmazin
> doing everything he can to not do a reverse split. What are his options?
> Buy at least a billion shares himself? Convince the SEC that it is
> a good thing to have easily manipulated penny stocks traded on NASDAQ
> permanantly? Acquire 1 million new subs in the fourth quarter? I
> listened to the interview and Brandon sees that as a possibility..Ok,
> we will see. I feel an $.80 price target is optimistic yet doable.
> Look for it to happen right before the Blackberry app is launched,
> people will buy the rumor then sell the news as they did with the
> SKYDOCK...The chance for this to hit $1.00 has passed with the great
> 3rd quarter report. As Mel K stated the reason the stock is only
> $.63 is because of the number of SHARES outstanding. This is not
> the typical penny stock that is undervalued. It has fair value,,
> it just is diluted at a ridiculous level. Mel K will go on a crusade
> to get the SEC to change their rules, just because at this stage
> he wants to show how powerful he is. He knows SIRI won't hit $1.00
> by March. he is already in talks with the SEC to get rules change
> to allow SIRI at $.60-$.70 to remain listed. We all know how easy
> penny stocks are manipulated. Yet Mel K is on a crusade to keep this
> stock a penny stock! ALL EGO on his part! How does this help stock
> holders? This stock won't move anymore until it has a respectable
> s/p, well over $1.00. For that to happen r/s is needed. Until then
> I'm all out...Someone help me understand why it is a good thing to
> have billions of shares outstanding and exclude institutional investors?
> I do a lot of Margin trades...I can't even trade SIRI on margin because
> it's a penny stock...What is the benefit of having this dilution?
> someone please help me understand! Mel K is keeping many interested
> investors out for what? Self importance? Or some other yet to be
> seen reason....Proceed with caution with this stock at this time...Watch
> how at the end of the day SIRI will trade at $.63 or $.64 even....many
> .0001 moves through the day....something is up with this stock....Using
> my fraud algorithm, it will end the day 7pm at exactly $.63....trust
> me...
>
> Sorry to keep you wating Scooterpod...I was in the gym......
>
> On Dec 01 08:58 AM Scooterpod wrote:]]> Tue, 01 Dec 2009 13:12:23 -0500

On Dec 01 12:22 PM Jerrold Williams wrote:

> Thanks for the intro Scotterpod...Let me give everyone some insight.
>
> First,
> Senior Analyst Murray Arenson has a price target of $.80. SIRIUS
> XM needs to get their share price over $1.00 by March 15, 2010. Therefore
> Mr. Arenson is indirectly predicting a reverse split. As far as "not
> anytime soon", well not within the next month...That is agreed, but
> it will be done within the next 4 months. As far as Mel Karmazin
> doing everything he can to not do a reverse split. What are his options?
> Buy at least a billion shares himself? Convince the SEC that it is
> a good thing to have easily manipulated penny stocks traded on NASDAQ
> permanantly? Acquire 1 million new subs in the fourth quarter? I
> listened to the interview and Brandon sees that as a possibility..Ok,
> we will see. I feel an $.80 price target is optimistic yet doable.
> Look for it to happen right before the Blackberry app is launched,
> people will buy the rumor then sell the news as they did with the
> SKYDOCK...The chance for this to hit $1.00 has passed with the great
> 3rd quarter report. As Mel K stated the reason the stock is only
> $.63 is because of the number of SHARES outstanding. This is not
> the typical penny stock that is undervalued. It has fair value,,
> it just is diluted at a ridiculous level. Mel K will go on a crusade
> to get the SEC to change their rules, just because at this stage
> he wants to show how powerful he is. He knows SIRI won't hit $1.00
> by March. he is already in talks with the SEC to get rules change
> to allow SIRI at $.60-$.70 to remain listed. We all know how easy
> penny stocks are manipulated. Yet Mel K is on a crusade to keep this
> stock a penny stock! ALL EGO on his part! How does this help stock
> holders? This stock won't move anymore until it has a respectable
> s/p, well over $1.00. For that to happen r/s is needed. Until then
> I'm all out...Someone help me understand why it is a good thing to
> have billions of shares outstanding and exclude institutional investors?
> I do a lot of Margin trades...I can't even trade SIRI on margin because
> it's a penny stock...What is the benefit of having this dilution?
> someone please help me understand! Mel K is keeping many interested
> investors out for what? Self importance? Or some other yet to be
> seen reason....Proceed with caution with this stock at this time...Watch
> how at the end of the day SIRI will trade at $.63 or $.64 even....many
> .0001 moves through the day....something is up with this stock....Using
> my fraud algorithm, it will end the day 7pm at exactly $.63....trust
> me...
>
> Sorry to keep you wating Scooterpod...I was in the gym......
>
> On Dec 01 08:58 AM Scooterpod wrote:]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/175896-janco-partners-arenson-resumes-sirius-coverage-discusses-pros-and-cons?source=feed#comment-784353 784353 Tue, 01 Dec 2009 10:22:12 -0500 http://seekingalpha.com/article/174490-sirius-trend-independent-analyst-opinions-turning-positive?source=feed#comment-784135 784135

On Dec 01 08:27 AM Pell wrote:

> Jerrold, I will be contacting Seeking Alpha and E-Trade today. I
> suggest you do the same.
>
> I urge anyone who is not assciated with SATWAVES in anyway do the
> same.
>
> Unforntunately, some people may believe some of the garbage like
> Mel is going to publically announce a R/S in an interview, or SIRIXM
> is ready for China when the stock is stagnant.
>
> SATWAVES and RAF and I suspect some othrs are PAID! End of story
> and it should be disclosed or readers should take legal action against,
> SATWAVES, RAF SEEKING ALPHA and E-Trade.
>
> That is how I will present my case to Seeking Alpha and E-Trade.
>
>
> SIRILONG waiting for real reporting]]> Tue, 01 Dec 2009 08:49:14 -0500

On Dec 01 08:27 AM Pell wrote:

> Jerrold, I will be contacting Seeking Alpha and E-Trade today. I
> suggest you do the same.
>
> I urge anyone who is not assciated with SATWAVES in anyway do the
> same.
>
> Unforntunately, some people may believe some of the garbage like
> Mel is going to publically announce a R/S in an interview, or SIRIXM
> is ready for China when the stock is stagnant.
>
> SATWAVES and RAF and I suspect some othrs are PAID! End of story
> and it should be disclosed or readers should take legal action against,
> SATWAVES, RAF SEEKING ALPHA and E-Trade.
>
> That is how I will present my case to Seeking Alpha and E-Trade.
>
>
> SIRILONG waiting for real reporting]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/174490-sirius-trend-independent-analyst-opinions-turning-positive?source=feed#comment-783210 783210

On Nov 30 03:55 PM Jerrold Williams wrote:

> There you have it....The "expert" even admits SIRI is dead (stagnant)
> at least for the rest of this year and probably until at best Febuary
> 2010 if they have a great report. Then as they get closer to March,
> the rev-split will come...Or Mel K will be stubborn and extend for
> another 6 months or whatever...This has to stop....I love the service,
> but I had to sell all shares and look to buy back in 2010 as we approach
> the report if I notice a buzz about the service. I lucked out today
> and purchased big on VOXX. Audiovox the maker of the SKYDOCK....its
> up close to 9% today......SIRI still stagnating.....a penny stock
> that moves up and down a penny or so.......Mel K stop this!!! SIRI
> investors have become "fans" of the stock....I am a fan of the service....but
> not a fan of any stock that holds steady in the $.60's. I buy
> stocks to make a gain...not to be a cheerleader! Stop the manipulation
> of the stock!!!! REV-SPLIT!!! lET'S START THE MOVEMENT!!! Penny
> stocks have too many negatives.....UNDO THE WRONG!!!
>
> I understand those holding for TAX REASONS...otherwise, I'd sell
> and buy back in 2010 as RAF agrees will be when we may see some more
> gains....Too bad...if it wasnt a penny stock...it would be moving
> much more...]]> Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:28:56 -0500

On Nov 30 03:55 PM Jerrold Williams wrote:

> There you have it....The "expert" even admits SIRI is dead (stagnant)
> at least for the rest of this year and probably until at best Febuary
> 2010 if they have a great report. Then as they get closer to March,
> the rev-split will come...Or Mel K will be stubborn and extend for
> another 6 months or whatever...This has to stop....I love the service,
> but I had to sell all shares and look to buy back in 2010 as we approach
> the report if I notice a buzz about the service. I lucked out today
> and purchased big on VOXX. Audiovox the maker of the SKYDOCK....its
> up close to 9% today......SIRI still stagnating.....a penny stock
> that moves up and down a penny or so.......Mel K stop this!!! SIRI
> investors have become "fans" of the stock....I am a fan of the service....but
> not a fan of any stock that holds steady in the $.60's. I buy
> stocks to make a gain...not to be a cheerleader! Stop the manipulation
> of the stock!!!! REV-SPLIT!!! lET'S START THE MOVEMENT!!! Penny
> stocks have too many negatives.....UNDO THE WRONG!!!
>
> I understand those holding for TAX REASONS...otherwise, I'd sell
> and buy back in 2010 as RAF agrees will be when we may see some more
> gains....Too bad...if it wasnt a penny stock...it would be moving
> much more...]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/174490-sirius-trend-independent-analyst-opinions-turning-positive?source=feed#comment-783186 783186

On Nov 30 03:55 PM Jerrold Williams wrote:

> There you have it....The "expert" even admits SIRI is dead (stagnant)
> at least for the rest of this year and probably until at best Febuary
> 2010 if they have a great report. Then as they get closer to March,
> the rev-split will come...Or Mel K will be stubborn and extend for
> another 6 months or whatever...This has to stop....I love the service,
> but I had to sell all shares and look to buy back in 2010 as we approach
> the report if I notice a buzz about the service. I lucked out today
> and purchased big on VOXX. Audiovox the maker of the SKYDOCK....its
> up close to 9% today......SIRI still stagnating.....a penny stock
> that moves up and down a penny or so.......Mel K stop this!!! SIRI
> investors have become "fans" of the stock....I am a fan of the service....but
> not a fan of any stock that holds steady in the $.60's. I buy
> stocks to make a gain...not to be a cheerleader! Stop the manipulation
> of the stock!!!! REV-SPLIT!!! lET'S START THE MOVEMENT!!! Penny
> stocks have too many negatives.....UNDO THE WRONG!!!
>
> I understand those holding for TAX REASONS...otherwise, I'd sell
> and buy back in 2010 as RAF agrees will be when we may see some more
> gains....Too bad...if it wasnt a penny stock...it would be moving
> much more...]]> Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:10:18 -0500

On Nov 30 03:55 PM Jerrold Williams wrote:

> There you have it....The "expert" even admits SIRI is dead (stagnant)
> at least for the rest of this year and probably until at best Febuary
> 2010 if they have a great report. Then as they get closer to March,
> the rev-split will come...Or Mel K will be stubborn and extend for
> another 6 months or whatever...This has to stop....I love the service,
> but I had to sell all shares and look to buy back in 2010 as we approach
> the report if I notice a buzz about the service. I lucked out today
> and purchased big on VOXX. Audiovox the maker of the SKYDOCK....its
> up close to 9% today......SIRI still stagnating.....a penny stock
> that moves up and down a penny or so.......Mel K stop this!!! SIRI
> investors have become "fans" of the stock....I am a fan of the service....but
> not a fan of any stock that holds steady in the $.60's. I buy
> stocks to make a gain...not to be a cheerleader! Stop the manipulation
> of the stock!!!! REV-SPLIT!!! lET'S START THE MOVEMENT!!! Penny
> stocks have too many negatives.....UNDO THE WRONG!!!
>
> I understand those holding for TAX REASONS...otherwise, I'd sell
> and buy back in 2010 as RAF agrees will be when we may see some more
> gains....Too bad...if it wasnt a penny stock...it would be moving
> much more...]]> http://seekingalpha.com/article/174490-sirius-trend-independent-analyst-opinions-turning-positive?source=feed#comment-783084 783084 Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:55:12 -0500 http://seekingalpha.com/article/174490-sirius-trend-independent-analyst-opinions-turning-positive?source=feed#comment-783052 783052 Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:27:26 -0500 http://seekingalpha.com/article/175633-a-power-a-powerful-stock-for-an-option-trade?source=feed#comment-781925 781925 Sun, 29 Nov 2009 20:05:19 -0500 http://seekingalpha.com/article/175517-china-s-green-stimulus-a-power-first-solar-may-get-big-chunk?source=feed#comment-779932 779932 Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:34:18 -0500