DB Chief Risk Officer: We're in the Middle of the Crisis Still [View article]
If you do not understand how the govt manipulates statistics, you do deserve the govt. you get, and the investment returns too. At what point will you believe we are in a Depression, 10 years after it is over when the govt. "revisions" catch up?
On Mar 31 02:14 PM Vox Rationalis (aka BS Detector) wrote:
> "Zero Hedge would be willing to bet that at least 5 of these data > points will likely receive some peculiar fudging, resulting in totally > unexpected upside surprises..." > > Looks like one for the loss column. > > By the way, did you bother to look at the durable goods order data > that seems to form the basis for your conspiracy theory about seasonal > data adjustment? The seasonally-adjusted growth in new orders from > January to February was 3.4%. The base number, which is adjusted > for calendar days? 3.2%. > > Excuse me if I'm unimpressed by your theory.
-
If you do not understand how the govt manipulates statistics, you do deserve the govt. you get, and the investment returns too.
Apr 01 07:50 am
|Rating:
+1
-2
All Comments by monday1929 »DB Chief Risk Officer: We're in the Middle of the Crisis Still [View article]
At what point will you believe we are in a Depression, 10 years after it is over when the govt. "revisions" catch up?
On Mar 31 02:14 PM Vox Rationalis (aka BS Detector) wrote:
> "Zero Hedge would be willing to bet that at least 5 of these data
> points will likely receive some peculiar fudging, resulting in totally
> unexpected upside surprises..."
>
> Looks like one for the loss column.
>
> By the way, did you bother to look at the durable goods order data
> that seems to form the basis for your conspiracy theory about seasonal
> data adjustment? The seasonally-adjusted growth in new orders from
> January to February was 3.4%. The base number, which is adjusted
> for calendar days? 3.2%.
>
> Excuse me if I'm unimpressed by your theory.