<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>jasonrothman1's Comments</title>
    <description>jasonrothman1's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/1696001/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>Edward Lampert's Baby: Is A REIT Around The Corner?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1466741/comments?source=feed#comment-19756432</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19756432</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Yes, and what happens to all the 100's of thousands of store employees that he's not informing about his so called plan to &quot;wind down the retail operations?&quot;  I guess that'll help our economy by adding to the unemployment rate?<br/><br/>Just another Wall Street genius helping the American economy prosper for his own good. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 22:29:42 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Yes, and what happens to all the 100's of thousands of store employees that he's not informing about his so called plan to &quot;wind down the retail operations?&quot;  I guess that'll help our economy by adding to the unemployment rate?<br/><br/>Just another Wall Street genius helping the American economy prosper for his own good. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Edward Lampert's Baby: Is A REIT Around The Corner?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1466741/comments?source=feed#comment-19756122</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19756122</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It's a &quot;pipe dream&quot; if you think they'll get 4 times the rent by subleasing, even with the current valuation of the lease. Sears Holdings is burning through cash faster then their ability to make these deals happen anyways. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 22:00:50 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It's a &quot;pipe dream&quot; if you think they'll get 4 times the rent by subleasing, even with the current valuation of the lease. Sears Holdings is burning through cash faster then their ability to make these deals happen anyways. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Profit From The Fear And Confusion Surrounding Sears</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1487102/comments?source=feed#comment-19751912</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19751912</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Why would Lampert? His investment in the company I've read averages less than $20 a share. <br/><br/>When all is said and done, he will most likely make out like a bandit, but I still feel there's not as much value in the real estate as some think, and so far they haven't been able to realize much profit from it. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 16:31:01 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Why would Lampert? His investment in the company I've read averages less than $20 a share. <br/><br/>When all is said and done, he will most likely make out like a bandit, but I still feel there's not as much value in the real estate as some think, and so far they haven't been able to realize much profit from it. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Profit From The Fear And Confusion Surrounding Sears</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1487102/comments?source=feed#comment-19751712</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19751712</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I'm sure he does, but as the now CEO of the company, he should be as concerned about the &quot;retail side&quot; as he is about the &quot;real estate&quot; side, or he is simply manipulating the company for his personal own good in the long term? ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 16:14:45 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I'm sure he does, but as the now CEO of the company, he should be as concerned about the &quot;retail side&quot; as he is about the &quot;real estate&quot; side, or he is simply manipulating the company for his personal own good in the long term? ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Profit From The Fear And Confusion Surrounding Sears</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1487102/comments?source=feed#comment-19751532</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19751532</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Never said it would end up hurting him. There's plenty of scenarios where he and Berkowitz comes out on top, and it does make sense if you're the &quot;majority&quot; shareholder in the company, you pretty much control or own it. That's why, as you have said, he &quot;buys on the dips.&quot;]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 15:58:59 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Never said it would end up hurting him. There's plenty of scenarios where he and Berkowitz comes out on top, and it does make sense if you're the &quot;majority&quot; shareholder in the company, you pretty much control or own it. That's why, as you have said, he &quot;buys on the dips.&quot;]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Profit From The Fear And Confusion Surrounding Sears</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1487102/comments?source=feed#comment-19751212</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19751212</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[You may not feel the &quot;retail side&quot; of the company is very important, but I for one would feel better if they would &quot;invest and redevelop&quot; them, as well. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 15:40:43 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[You may not feel the &quot;retail side&quot; of the company is very important, but I for one would feel better if they would &quot;invest and redevelop&quot; them, as well. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Profit From The Fear And Confusion Surrounding Sears</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1487102/comments?source=feed#comment-19751132</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19751132</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[At least we'll know where the top corporate personnel will go to live with the remaining money left in the company they take with them in the form of bonuses, stock options, severance, and &quot;parachute&quot; packages after the company is sold off and bankrupt. Although, I'm sure Lampert will retreat to his island estate off the coast of Florida and retire (well, not really, he'll still run ESL investments and own the rights to the Kenmore, Craftsman, and Diehard brand names)]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 15:36:10 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[At least we'll know where the top corporate personnel will go to live with the remaining money left in the company they take with them in the form of bonuses, stock options, severance, and &quot;parachute&quot; packages after the company is sold off and bankrupt. Although, I'm sure Lampert will retreat to his island estate off the coast of Florida and retire (well, not really, he'll still run ESL investments and own the rights to the Kenmore, Craftsman, and Diehard brand names)]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Profit From The Fear And Confusion Surrounding Sears</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1487102/comments?source=feed#comment-19750952</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">19750952</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Here's the article and what it states about that Burnaby project:<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/18gkawj'>http://bit.ly/18gkawj</a><br/><br/>&quot;In addition, it is too early to tell whether or not the project will be completed given a multitude of potential factors, both internal and external, such as the economic value for the Company, shifts in the Canadian economy, and the condition of the real estate market now or in the future. Furthermore, this is a multi-year endeavour, and the length of time it will take from this early stage of discussions with the City of Burnaby to a potential completion, is estimated at several years. Therefore, although there have been estimates made of the value of the project, even if it was to proceed, it is too early in the process for the Company to declare any value associated with it.&quot;<br/><br/>You are correct about this project being &quot;similar to the project in Minneapolis&quot; in that neither one has broken ground yet, and with the shape the Holdings company is in, they may never.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 15:23:04 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Here's the article and what it states about that Burnaby project:<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/18gkawj'>http://bit.ly/18gkawj</a><br/><br/>&quot;In addition, it is too early to tell whether or not the project will be completed given a multitude of potential factors, both internal and external, such as the economic value for the Company, shifts in the Canadian economy, and the condition of the real estate market now or in the future. Furthermore, this is a multi-year endeavour, and the length of time it will take from this early stage of discussions with the City of Burnaby to a potential completion, is estimated at several years. Therefore, although there have been estimates made of the value of the project, even if it was to proceed, it is too early in the process for the Company to declare any value associated with it.&quot;<br/><br/>You are correct about this project being &quot;similar to the project in Minneapolis&quot; in that neither one has broken ground yet, and with the shape the Holdings company is in, they may never.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Danger Zone 4/23/2013: Sears Holdings</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1360181/comments?source=feed#comment-18953921</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18953921</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[If you just plan on following your &quot;brilliant value investors,&quot; instead of doing your own &quot;due diligence,&quot; I see no value or need for you to make any comments on articles. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 13:59:44 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[If you just plan on following your &quot;brilliant value investors,&quot; instead of doing your own &quot;due diligence,&quot; I see no value or need for you to make any comments on articles. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Danger Zone 4/23/2013: Sears Holdings</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1360181/comments?source=feed#comment-18740121</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18740121</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[This is what the article states about the Data Centers and leasing:<br/><br/>&quot;Meanwhile, Ubiquity seeks deals with cell phone carriers such as Verizon Communications Inc. and AT&amp;T Inc. to affix antennas to roofs of Sears and Kmart buildings.&quot;<br/><br/>“Unlike a data center, you're not putting in $50 million to $60 million to build it. The carrier comes out and puts in the tower, and you just collect the rent.”<br/><br/>The &quot;not investing a penny&quot; refers to Cell Phone towers built on top of Sears/Kmart stores because they can lease the rooftop without building anything. Like the &quot;Field of Dreams&quot; movie, &quot;if you build it, they will come.&quot; But first Lampert has to build it, before companies will come to lease the servers inside.<br/><br/>Bottom line, the final analysis of the article states:<br/><br/>&quot;Alternate uses for real estate won't, on their own, save a corporation that lost $930 million in fiscal 2012. But, if the plan is executed effectively, Sears could add much-needed income.&quot;<br/><br/>which is somewhat optimistic, at least.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 15:48:54 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[This is what the article states about the Data Centers and leasing:<br/><br/>&quot;Meanwhile, Ubiquity seeks deals with cell phone carriers such as Verizon Communications Inc. and AT&amp;T Inc. to affix antennas to roofs of Sears and Kmart buildings.&quot;<br/><br/>“Unlike a data center, you're not putting in $50 million to $60 million to build it. The carrier comes out and puts in the tower, and you just collect the rent.”<br/><br/>The &quot;not investing a penny&quot; refers to Cell Phone towers built on top of Sears/Kmart stores because they can lease the rooftop without building anything. Like the &quot;Field of Dreams&quot; movie, &quot;if you build it, they will come.&quot; But first Lampert has to build it, before companies will come to lease the servers inside.<br/><br/>Bottom line, the final analysis of the article states:<br/><br/>&quot;Alternate uses for real estate won't, on their own, save a corporation that lost $930 million in fiscal 2012. But, if the plan is executed effectively, Sears could add much-needed income.&quot;<br/><br/>which is somewhat optimistic, at least.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Danger Zone 4/23/2013: Sears Holdings</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1360181/comments?source=feed#comment-18726991</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18726991</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[If you read this article, there is big money that needs to be invested in creating a data center. Also, the article isn't very reassuring that Sears can pull it off. <br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/12pXKBU'>http://bit.ly/12pXKBU</a><br/><br/>If it costs $50 to $60 million per store, it'll be years before the revenue stream is a positive cash flow. Many locations aren't prime for this kind of place, so it's questionable how many stores can be converted. I suppose if they can't &quot;extract value&quot; from trying to run the stores properly or selling the property, it does make sense to try to make it into something else, but it's a big &quot;if&quot; with all the competition already out there dedicated to these kind of solutions they're offering. <br/><br/>I do give Lampert credit for thinking &quot;out of the box,&quot; but fragmenting your company and trying to do too many things at once and not being able to do any one thing right, may not necessarily be a solution to their problems.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 06:07:28 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[If you read this article, there is big money that needs to be invested in creating a data center. Also, the article isn't very reassuring that Sears can pull it off. <br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://bit.ly/12pXKBU'>http://bit.ly/12pXKBU</a><br/><br/>If it costs $50 to $60 million per store, it'll be years before the revenue stream is a positive cash flow. Many locations aren't prime for this kind of place, so it's questionable how many stores can be converted. I suppose if they can't &quot;extract value&quot; from trying to run the stores properly or selling the property, it does make sense to try to make it into something else, but it's a big &quot;if&quot; with all the competition already out there dedicated to these kind of solutions they're offering. <br/><br/>I do give Lampert credit for thinking &quot;out of the box,&quot; but fragmenting your company and trying to do too many things at once and not being able to do any one thing right, may not necessarily be a solution to their problems.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Danger Zone 4/23/2013: Sears Holdings</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1360181/comments?source=feed#comment-18726851</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18726851</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I see &quot;Payday Advance&quot; kiosks within their stores soon...LOL! Just another way to take advantage of poor people who think they have no other options. The same as when banks offer non-credit worthy individuals &quot;high interest/high fee&quot; credit cards. You don't see Wal-Mart stooping to these levels to get shoppers back into their stores and they're back to being the #1 Fortune 500 company again. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 05:42:54 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I see &quot;Payday Advance&quot; kiosks within their stores soon...LOL! Just another way to take advantage of poor people who think they have no other options. The same as when banks offer non-credit worthy individuals &quot;high interest/high fee&quot; credit cards. You don't see Wal-Mart stooping to these levels to get shoppers back into their stores and they're back to being the #1 Fortune 500 company again. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Danger Zone 4/23/2013: Sears Holdings</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1360181/comments?source=feed#comment-18651771</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18651771</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The operative word here is &quot;appear.&quot; If he's not nervous, which he should be, it's only because he feels he can at least get his money back and then some from the liquidation of Sears, but that is still debatable. As far as the subsidiaries and being larger than Amazon, if he's using the same &quot;game plan&quot; he's used the last 10 years to try to save the &quot;brick and mortar&quot; side of the company, I don't see much success in that venture either. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 19:22:49 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The operative word here is &quot;appear.&quot; If he's not nervous, which he should be, it's only because he feels he can at least get his money back and then some from the liquidation of Sears, but that is still debatable. As far as the subsidiaries and being larger than Amazon, if he's using the same &quot;game plan&quot; he's used the last 10 years to try to save the &quot;brick and mortar&quot; side of the company, I don't see much success in that venture either. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Danger Zone 4/23/2013: Sears Holdings</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1360181/comments?source=feed#comment-18182821</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18182821</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[MSF question to MLCGLOBAL:<br/>&quot;In your opinion if it all went bad do you see stock price valued at least at $140.00 in liquidation?&quot;<br/><br/>MLCGLOBAL response to MSF:<br/>&quot;That of course would be nice... it depends on the retail price per square foot in a fire sale. A ? that needs some digging&quot;<br/><br/>I can see why the author chose this as the &quot;author's pick.&quot; It shows that MSF with all his comments can't back anything up with real metrics, and the one person who backs MSF, and I might add used some real data to do it, even admits that it is all conjecture depending on what the real value of the property is at the time of the &quot;fire sale.&quot;<br/><br/>I'd also like to add, if there really is so much &quot;value&quot; in SHC as some say, why doesn't Lampert as representative of a personal investor, a hedge fund manager of ESL, and the CEO/COB of Sears Holdings, that would benefit from the rise of the stock price, make this &quot;transparent&quot; for all to see?...unless there really isn't as much value?...or maybe he's just &quot;manipulating&quot; the situation to be able to keep buying the stock on the cheap until he unfolds his real &quot;plan&quot; for the company, which I've read may even include taking the company private that would only benefit the &quot;majority&quot; stockholders?<br/><br/>I still think it's a big risk that I'm not willing to be part of it.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 02:57:21 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[MSF question to MLCGLOBAL:<br/>&quot;In your opinion if it all went bad do you see stock price valued at least at $140.00 in liquidation?&quot;<br/><br/>MLCGLOBAL response to MSF:<br/>&quot;That of course would be nice... it depends on the retail price per square foot in a fire sale. A ? that needs some digging&quot;<br/><br/>I can see why the author chose this as the &quot;author's pick.&quot; It shows that MSF with all his comments can't back anything up with real metrics, and the one person who backs MSF, and I might add used some real data to do it, even admits that it is all conjecture depending on what the real value of the property is at the time of the &quot;fire sale.&quot;<br/><br/>I'd also like to add, if there really is so much &quot;value&quot; in SHC as some say, why doesn't Lampert as representative of a personal investor, a hedge fund manager of ESL, and the CEO/COB of Sears Holdings, that would benefit from the rise of the stock price, make this &quot;transparent&quot; for all to see?...unless there really isn't as much value?...or maybe he's just &quot;manipulating&quot; the situation to be able to keep buying the stock on the cheap until he unfolds his real &quot;plan&quot; for the company, which I've read may even include taking the company private that would only benefit the &quot;majority&quot; stockholders?<br/><br/>I still think it's a big risk that I'm not willing to be part of it.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Danger Zone 4/23/2013: Sears Holdings</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1360181/comments?source=feed#comment-18054791</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18054791</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I don't remember where or exactly when but it was a few years ago I believe in a interview with Lampert that he stated that his focus was not competing with Walmart via a &quot;price war&quot; because he thought it was a &quot;losing battle,&quot; but rather he felt it was more important to give customers a better or &quot;wow&quot; experience shopping Sears and Kmart stores to bring them back again and again. From the financials etc., it doesn't appear that strategy is working well. Plus, I rarely see enough salespeople or cashiers on the sales floor in their stores to support that concept.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:21:25 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I don't remember where or exactly when but it was a few years ago I believe in a interview with Lampert that he stated that his focus was not competing with Walmart via a &quot;price war&quot; because he thought it was a &quot;losing battle,&quot; but rather he felt it was more important to give customers a better or &quot;wow&quot; experience shopping Sears and Kmart stores to bring them back again and again. From the financials etc., it doesn't appear that strategy is working well. Plus, I rarely see enough salespeople or cashiers on the sales floor in their stores to support that concept.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Danger Zone 4/23/2013: Sears Holdings</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1360181/comments?source=feed#comment-18008081</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">18008081</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Lampert engineered an incredibly take over of Kmart when they went bankrupt and used the windfall (by selling off of valuable Kmart owned properties) to take over Sears (which also was on the verge of bankruptcy) to merge two &quot;iconic&quot; companies together creating the 2nd largest retailer in the world in the hopes of making one huge money making machine to compete against Walmart, Target, as well as online superstar Amazon. <br/><br/>I'm sure Lampert thought he'd be able to turn the company around using his &quot;masterful&quot; investing and thinking style to become the &quot;hero&quot; that not only saved two &quot;iconic&quot; American companies, but made a fortune for his investors, as well. Well, with the recession and his &quot;masterful&quot; management style he hasn't been able to &quot;turnaround&quot; the company as he had hoped. <br/><br/>Now it looks like most investors see this &quot;real estate play&quot; and &quot;construction turnaround&quot; the &quot;Hail Mary&quot; that will save the company and/or investors. I'm no &quot;billionaire,&quot; and I'm sure my comments will be negated by some based just on that, because if you have at least a $billion you're automatically a &quot;superstar&quot; that can do no wrong. Well, I say this time you will see a &quot;superstar&quot; that made a mistake and isn't willing to admit to it and will do anything before he will, including &quot;going down with the ship.&quot; <br/><br/>I suppose after this all plays out, as with anything, only time will tell who is right or wrong, so have fun ridiculing my comments until then. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 20:31:48 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Lampert engineered an incredibly take over of Kmart when they went bankrupt and used the windfall (by selling off of valuable Kmart owned properties) to take over Sears (which also was on the verge of bankruptcy) to merge two &quot;iconic&quot; companies together creating the 2nd largest retailer in the world in the hopes of making one huge money making machine to compete against Walmart, Target, as well as online superstar Amazon. <br/><br/>I'm sure Lampert thought he'd be able to turn the company around using his &quot;masterful&quot; investing and thinking style to become the &quot;hero&quot; that not only saved two &quot;iconic&quot; American companies, but made a fortune for his investors, as well. Well, with the recession and his &quot;masterful&quot; management style he hasn't been able to &quot;turnaround&quot; the company as he had hoped. <br/><br/>Now it looks like most investors see this &quot;real estate play&quot; and &quot;construction turnaround&quot; the &quot;Hail Mary&quot; that will save the company and/or investors. I'm no &quot;billionaire,&quot; and I'm sure my comments will be negated by some based just on that, because if you have at least a $billion you're automatically a &quot;superstar&quot; that can do no wrong. Well, I say this time you will see a &quot;superstar&quot; that made a mistake and isn't willing to admit to it and will do anything before he will, including &quot;going down with the ship.&quot; <br/><br/>I suppose after this all plays out, as with anything, only time will tell who is right or wrong, so have fun ridiculing my comments until then. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sears: A Purely Speculative Play?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1298231/comments?source=feed#comment-16808611</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16808611</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Actually, it means a lot. They'll keep &quot;propping up&quot; the stock because the majority stock holders will be the ones making a killing off the break-up. Now, if you have the money to enter their realm of investment, then you to will make some money off this venture.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 00:49:52 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Actually, it means a lot. They'll keep &quot;propping up&quot; the stock because the majority stock holders will be the ones making a killing off the break-up. Now, if you have the money to enter their realm of investment, then you to will make some money off this venture.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sears: A Purely Speculative Play?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1298231/comments?source=feed#comment-16808441</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16808441</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Actually, that's probably the only project so far that shows promise, but it's &quot;too little, too late.&quot; If you could name at least 10 locations being developed with potential, then you're talking. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 00:40:19 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Actually, that's probably the only project so far that shows promise, but it's &quot;too little, too late.&quot; If you could name at least 10 locations being developed with potential, then you're talking. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sears: A Purely Speculative Play?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1298231/comments?source=feed#comment-16808391</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16808391</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Ultimately, all that money will only benefit him, not those he's in charge of. Some will make money. Maybe you'll be part of the &quot;some.&quot; I just doubt anyone but the largest majority investors will.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 00:37:09 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Ultimately, all that money will only benefit him, not those he's in charge of. Some will make money. Maybe you'll be part of the &quot;some.&quot; I just doubt anyone but the largest majority investors will.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sears: A Purely Speculative Play?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1298231/comments?source=feed#comment-16785611</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16785611</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[All speculation, as are most investments. In my opinion, if this company was going anywhere, it would have started in that direction by now. The few positive &quot;tidbits&quot; this article refers to doesn't out way most of the negatives that have been going on with Sears Holdings over the years. <br/><br/>If you want to risk your money in investing in a modern day &quot;Titanic&quot; and hope to make money off the pieces later, then good luck, but trying to change their &quot;culture&quot; with a few Tony Robbins type motivational statements without &quot;putting their money where their mouth is&quot; won't &quot;amount to a hill of beans.&quot; ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:25:17 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[All speculation, as are most investments. In my opinion, if this company was going anywhere, it would have started in that direction by now. The few positive &quot;tidbits&quot; this article refers to doesn't out way most of the negatives that have been going on with Sears Holdings over the years. <br/><br/>If you want to risk your money in investing in a modern day &quot;Titanic&quot; and hope to make money off the pieces later, then good luck, but trying to change their &quot;culture&quot; with a few Tony Robbins type motivational statements without &quot;putting their money where their mouth is&quot; won't &quot;amount to a hill of beans.&quot; ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Eddie Lampert will stay on as the CEO at Sears Holdings (SHLD -1%), according to a new SEC filing (10-K). The exec will only earn $1 a year in salary but will be in line for incentive payouts and more stock. By many accounts, Lampert has pushed a lot of the right buttons in his downsizing and asset sales with the company as mall peer J.C. Penney has tried differing tactics.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/902651?source=feed#comment-16713071</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16713071</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The &quot;carpet bombing&quot; bloggers have awoken.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 20:12:11 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The &quot;carpet bombing&quot; bloggers have awoken.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Eddie Lampert will stay on as the CEO at Sears Holdings (SHLD -1%), according to a new SEC filing (10-K). The exec will only earn $1 a year in salary but will be in line for incentive payouts and more stock. By many accounts, Lampert has pushed a lot of the right buttons in his downsizing and asset sales with the company as mall peer J.C. Penney has tried differing tactics.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/902651?source=feed#comment-16712941</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16712941</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I wouldn't be so sure of that. The retail end of the company has been &quot;bleeding&quot; money for years and still is. Probably more than enough for Lampert to be able to use for a tax write off to compensate for the taxes on the money he'll make from the &quot;pennies on the dollar&quot; the real estate end will make for him once he takes it all private for himself. Also, he has &quot;appeared&quot; to make an effort to turn it all around for the past 10 years, so he's probably covered on the legal aspect of doing it as well. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 20:03:39 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I wouldn't be so sure of that. The retail end of the company has been &quot;bleeding&quot; money for years and still is. Probably more than enough for Lampert to be able to use for a tax write off to compensate for the taxes on the money he'll make from the &quot;pennies on the dollar&quot; the real estate end will make for him once he takes it all private for himself. Also, he has &quot;appeared&quot; to make an effort to turn it all around for the past 10 years, so he's probably covered on the legal aspect of doing it as well. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Eddie Lampert will stay on as the CEO at Sears Holdings (SHLD -1%), according to a new SEC filing (10-K). The exec will only earn $1 a year in salary but will be in line for incentive payouts and more stock. By many accounts, Lampert has pushed a lot of the right buttons in his downsizing and asset sales with the company as mall peer J.C. Penney has tried differing tactics.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/902651?source=feed#comment-16628851</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16628851</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[True, but he'll still get &quot;a bonus of up to $2 million in cash or stock and up to $4.5 million in stock per year&quot; as quoted from this article:<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://yhoo.it/ZC77h9'>http://yhoo.it/ZC77h9</a> <br/><br/>Not bad for someone who hasn't been able to make the company profitable in the past 10 years of running it, fired most of the middle/dept. management which left the salesfloor to be run by skeleton crews, and has denied raises for his employees for the past 5 years.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 18:31:21 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[True, but he'll still get &quot;a bonus of up to $2 million in cash or stock and up to $4.5 million in stock per year&quot; as quoted from this article:<br/><br/><a rel='nofollow' target='_blank' href='http://yhoo.it/ZC77h9'>http://yhoo.it/ZC77h9</a> <br/><br/>Not bad for someone who hasn't been able to make the company profitable in the past 10 years of running it, fired most of the middle/dept. management which left the salesfloor to be run by skeleton crews, and has denied raises for his employees for the past 5 years.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sears Is Headed Lower: Part II, Brands And Real Estate</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1249041/comments?source=feed#comment-16407971</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16407971</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[....only to &quot;squeeze out&quot; the small investor later....]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2013 16:23:02 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[....only to &quot;squeeze out&quot; the small investor later....]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sears Is Headed Lower: Part II, Brands And Real Estate</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1249041/comments?source=feed#comment-16351251</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16351251</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[JCPenny should be seeing a &quot;buyout&quot; offer from Eddie Lampert soon so he can merge these companies in one great &quot;hidden real estate value&quot;......LOL! Actually, I think he'll wait until they're in bankruptcy first.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 18:46:56 -0400</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[JCPenny should be seeing a &quot;buyout&quot; offer from Eddie Lampert soon so he can merge these companies in one great &quot;hidden real estate value&quot;......LOL! Actually, I think he'll wait until they're in bankruptcy first.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sears Is Headed Lower: Part II, Brands And Real Estate</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1249041/comments?source=feed#comment-16086621</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16086621</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I don't see anywhere in these articles that state Eddie Lampert should be &quot;careful,&quot; just regular investors like you and I. Please read more diligently.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2013 00:27:30 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I don't see anywhere in these articles that state Eddie Lampert should be &quot;careful,&quot; just regular investors like you and I. Please read more diligently.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sears Is Headed Lower: Part II, Brands And Real Estate</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1249041/comments?source=feed#comment-16086491</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16086491</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Unfortunately, there's been so called &quot;criminals&quot; at the head of Kmart for decades before Lampert moved in. They're the ones the gave Eddie his opportunity and Walmart to take over the retail world...LOL!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2013 00:21:01 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Unfortunately, there's been so called &quot;criminals&quot; at the head of Kmart for decades before Lampert moved in. They're the ones the gave Eddie his opportunity and Walmart to take over the retail world...LOL!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sears Is Headed Lower: Part II, Brands And Real Estate</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1249041/comments?source=feed#comment-16086361</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16086361</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Just like &quot;two wrongs don't make a right,&quot; posting the same reply twice doesn't make you right.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2013 00:04:44 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Just like &quot;two wrongs don't make a right,&quot; posting the same reply twice doesn't make you right.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sears Is Headed Lower: Part II, Brands And Real Estate</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1249041/comments?source=feed#comment-16086271</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16086271</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Haven't seen much &quot;redevelopment&quot; or &quot;investing in profitable stores&quot; but Lampert is a &quot;techy&quot; kind of guy and the online stuff is just a &quot;plaything&quot; for Lampert to see if he can duplicate Amazon's success. Plus the money isn't directly coming out of his pocket, and he has to make some kind of effort to &quot;save the company.&quot;<br/><br/>Also, wasn't the store in the Ala Moana Center in Hawaii one of their most profitable? What happened to it?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 23:55:09 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Haven't seen much &quot;redevelopment&quot; or &quot;investing in profitable stores&quot; but Lampert is a &quot;techy&quot; kind of guy and the online stuff is just a &quot;plaything&quot; for Lampert to see if he can duplicate Amazon's success. Plus the money isn't directly coming out of his pocket, and he has to make some kind of effort to &quot;save the company.&quot;<br/><br/>Also, wasn't the store in the Ala Moana Center in Hawaii one of their most profitable? What happened to it?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sears Is Headed Lower: Part II, Brands And Real Estate</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1249041/comments?source=feed#comment-16085901</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">16085901</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[My opinion, but Lampert is a very patient investor and doesn't want people to think he was &quot;misleading&quot; the public or investors in the venture he started 10 years ago. Also, we all know he's pretty smart and most likely has factored both scenarios and has just been waiting to see which one &quot;pans out&quot; to his advantage. Unfortunately, for the company and &quot;small-time&quot; investors, I'm leaning toward this article's possibility as the most likely. Either way, it's a &quot;win-win&quot; situation for Lampert even if he keeps buying on the dips. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 23:17:43 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[My opinion, but Lampert is a very patient investor and doesn't want people to think he was &quot;misleading&quot; the public or investors in the venture he started 10 years ago. Also, we all know he's pretty smart and most likely has factored both scenarios and has just been waiting to see which one &quot;pans out&quot; to his advantage. Unfortunately, for the company and &quot;small-time&quot; investors, I'm leaning toward this article's possibility as the most likely. Either way, it's a &quot;win-win&quot; situation for Lampert even if he keeps buying on the dips. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
