> I'm not going to bother responding to the rest of your comment but > the simple fact that you cite operating income for P/E valuations > says enough about your argument not to mention those pesky recurring > "non-recurring" charges for GAAP.
Just so everyone understands - you're so offended by my mention of operating earnings (which are tracked by S&P) IN ADDITION to GAAP earnings, that you're unwilling to waste your precious time rebutting my critique.
Do you know how pathetic that is?
> Clearly we can revert back to > the good 'ole days of 2007 but with double the unemployment rate. >
-
On Aug 21 02:31 PM Moses wrote:
Aug 21 23:35 pm
|Rating:
0
-1
All Comments by Vox Rationalis »A dramatic visual of how an earnings-less rally can produce a historic P/E ratio. [View news story]
> I'm not going to bother responding to the rest of your comment but
> the simple fact that you cite operating income for P/E valuations
> says enough about your argument not to mention those pesky recurring
> "non-recurring" charges for GAAP.
Just so everyone understands - you're so offended by my mention of operating earnings (which are tracked by S&P) IN ADDITION to GAAP earnings, that you're unwilling to waste your precious time rebutting my critique.
Do you know how pathetic that is?
> Clearly we can revert back to
> the good 'ole days of 2007 but with double the unemployment rate.
>