Seeking Alpha

dlaw » Comments » BAC

  • The End of Money [View article]
    Mad Hedge, I think this has very much a "toppy" feel.

    If you look at the arguments for gold, there is no reason it should be going down. No reason it should go down in the foreseeable future. That is the stuff bubbles are made of - certainty.

    Gold is going down. The federal government is doing all it can to inflate, but gold is going down. Down too much, the logic is destroyed and there may be panic selling. People paying $1000/oz for coins and certainty are not going to be happy at $700/oz.


    On Feb 28 10:14 PM The Mad Hedge Fund Trader wrote:

    > OP tf Panic buying of gold coins continues to overwhelm coins dealers
    > around the world. According to the Financial Times, the US Mint sold
    > 193,500 American eagles in the first seven weeks of this year, more
    > than it sold in all of 2007 at prices 40% lower. Retail investors
    > fleeing paper assets, like plummeting stocks and bonds, are paying
    > 5% premiums over face values. The same phenomena is appearing in
    > other countries were gold coins are available to the public. Does
    > this have a toppy feel to it?
    Mar 02 12:14 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • The End of Money [View article]
    Mad Hedge, I think this has very much a "toppy" feel.

    If you look at the arguments for gold, there is no reason it should be going down. No reason it should go down in the foreseeable future. That is the stuff bubbles are made of - certainty.

    Gold is going down. The federal government is doing all it can to inflate, but gold is going down. Down too much, the logic is destroyed and there may be panic selling. People paying $1000/oz for coins and certainty are not going to be happy at $700/oz.


    On Feb 28 10:14 PM The Mad Hedge Fund Trader wrote:

    > OP tf Panic buying of gold coins continues to overwhelm coins dealers
    > around the world. According to the Financial Times, the US Mint sold
    > 193,500 American eagles in the first seven weeks of this year, more
    > than it sold in all of 2007 at prices 40% lower. Retail investors
    > fleeing paper assets, like plummeting stocks and bonds, are paying
    > 5% premiums over face values. The same phenomena is appearing in
    > other countries were gold coins are available to the public. Does
    > this have a toppy feel to it?
    Mar 02 12:14 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • The End of Money [View article]
    Thanks for the comment - and all the capital letters.
    Feb 27 15:19 pm |Rating: 0 -1 |Link to Comment
  • Too Big to Bail: Lehman Brothers Is the Model for Fixing the Zombie Banks [View article]
    The author writes:

    "The definition of "systemic risk" is when markets are surprised, but these are political distinctions. Repeat after us: "there is no such thing as systemic risk," at least that can be measured scientifically."

    I find this to be an absolutely remarkable statement, considering it was made by a person who is obviously so intelligent. To write such a thing, one would have to believe - in essence - that people's behavior never changes or at least that all behavior changes that are economically meaningful exist on a smooth continuum. Unable to deal with reality outside his lovely Gaussian models, he simply calls all that enormous amount of human behavior: "political" and dismisses it. It's no longer part of his world so he doesn't have to deal with it.

    The very real, very well-understood *economic* fact is that when the circumstances of people's lives change - when events actually occur in their lives - their behavior changes in a quantized, discontinuoos way - no matter how much they are expecting the change. It's just a fact.

    Mr. Whalen may pretend that this doesn't apply to him, but he's living in a fantasy world. So too are the bondholders of our major banks. When that fantasy world cracks, both Mr. Whalen and these bondholders will start to act very differently, very quickly and that will be a bewildering day for them.

    Feb 19 13:49 pm |Rating: +1 -1 |Link to Comment
  • What the Treasury Plan Needs: Price Discovery, Writedowns and More [View article]

    "Price Discovery"???

    How about we figure out what the heck these jokers are even trying to sell us first?
    Feb 11 17:13 pm |Rating: +2 0 |Link to Comment
  • The Great Bank Rush of 2008: What's the Money For? [View article]
    Wow is there are good observations here - really important stuff.

    I don't agree with all the author's conclusions but so what?

    He raises questions important enough that we should all be re-thinking our conclusions.
    Sep 29 10:54 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Young Jeezy's 'The Recession': I Think We’ve Bottomed Out [View article]
    If the combination of this young fool thinking he's a contrarian because the market has been negative for five minutes and the old fool, sharksm writing "the upside over the long term is infinite", then nothing will.

    The combination of the two is the best sell signal I've ever seen.

    There is clearly WAY more optimism (or denial, take your pick) buried in the market than I thought. Until that optimism gets wrung out, we won't find post-bubble pricing.
    Aug 11 13:26 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Credit Crisis Review: ARMed for Failure [View article]
    And not for nothing but Atavist when you call something "trivial," it's best to attach it to a comment which is not itself the most trivial statement on the entire page.

    If you don't want to take the evidence from what has happened after Sub-Prime ARMs adjusted after two years and apply it to what may happen when Alt-A Lemon Loans adjust after five years, don't. But all it will mean is that you are ignoring evidence - which may suit you, I don't know.
    Aug 04 10:04 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Credit Crisis Review: ARMed for Failure [View article]

    I agree with most of what the author's written, except that he makes a fool of himself by continuing this ridiculous "blame the borrowers" story.

    The evidence is clear: American banks deliberately and with forethought decided to VASTLY increase the number of poorly-documented mortgages they wrote. To suggest that they were somehow taken advantage of - en masse - is absurd. Borrowers did not hypnotize American bankers. American bankers decided to securitize lots and lots of loans with "broken odometers".

    These were not "liar loans," these were "Lemon Loans" - bad product deliberately brought to market with bad information.

    Messrs. Akerlof, Spence, and Stiglitz got a Nobel prize in economics for telling us what happens when you fill a market with lemons - and it's not good.
    Aug 04 09:59 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
More on BAC by dlaw
Comments by Ticker
dlaw's
Comments Stats
191 comments
Rating: 24 (104 - 80 )