Amazon: Is 'Free Cash Flow' More Important Than Net Income? [View article]
Longtermvl- repeat some #s didn’t come out in above
Is AMZN’s FCF from Short-term Cash held from Customers' Sales December Q, paid to suppliers in the March 2008 Q WORTH $16bn in Market Valuation??? Remember this FCF, as many classify it, is not Net Income.
Goldman put a 20 X 2009 estimated FCF, to try to justify Amazon's valuation of $34bn. (2009?)
Amazon a company that earned $1.5bn in the past 6 years, a 2007 profit of $476ml and a P/E of 60+) How can "FCF" (aside from earnings) most of which is of POOR QUALITY be given such a outrageous valuation (20X).
From the Goldman recommendation-in the article-
"Trading at around 20X 2009E free cash flow, Goldman believes Amazon stock can outperform on rising revenue if margins are only flat; RAPID REVENUE GROWTH ASSISTS FREE CASH FLOW BECAUSE AMAZON USES ITS IMPROVING CATEGORY SHARE TO NEGOTIATE LONGER PAYMENT TO SUPPLIERS in categories such as books..."
"FCF" for 2007 according to their definition (computation 1- in the article) came out to $1.181bn, as compared to (computation 2) the FCF beginning with Net Income , of $496ml a difference of $685ml.
Do you feel it is proper or fair to value this $685ml at $13bn, ($685ml x 20 = $13.7bn?) when it all vanished in the following quarter?
Amazon: Is 'Free Cash Flow' More Important Than Net Income? [View article]
Longtermvl- repeat some #s didn’t come out in above
Is AMZN’s FCF from Short-term Cash held from Customers' Sales December Q, paid to suppliers in the March 2008 Q WORTH $16bn in Market Valuation??? Remember this FCF, as many classify it, is not Net Income.
Goldman put a 20 X 2009 estimated FCF, to try to justify Amazon's valuation of $34bn. (2009?)
Amazon a company that earned $1.5bn in the past 6 years, a 2007 profit of $476ml and a P/E of 60+) How can "FCF" (aside from earnings) most of which is of POOR QUALITY be given such a outrageous valuation (20X).
From the Goldman recommendation-in the article-
"Trading at around 20X 2009E free cash flow, Goldman believes Amazon stock can outperform on rising revenue if margins are only flat; RAPID REVENUE GROWTH ASSISTS FREE CASH FLOW BECAUSE AMAZON USES ITS IMPROVING CATEGORY SHARE TO NEGOTIATE LONGER PAYMENT TO SUPPLIERS in categories such as books..."
"FCF" for 2007 according to their definition (computation 1- in the article) came out to $1.181bn, as compared to (computation 2) the FCF beginning with Net Income , of $496ml a difference of $685ml.
Do you feel it is proper or fair to value this $685ml at $13bn, ($685ml x 20 = $13.7bn?) when it all vanished in the following quarter?
Amazon: Is 'Free Cash Flow' More Important Than Net Income? [View article]
Longtermvl-
Is AMZN’s FCF from Short-term Cash held from Customers' Sales December Q, paid to suppliers in the March 2008 Q worth $16bn in Market Valuation??? Remember this FCF, as many classify it, is not Net Income.
Goldman put a 20 X 2009 estimated FCF, to try to justify Amazon's valuation of $34bn. (2009?)
Amazon a company that earned $1.5bn in the past 6 years, a 2007 profit of $476ml and a P/E of 60+) How can "FCF" (aside from earnings) most of which is of POOR QUALITY be given such a outrageous valuation (20X).
From the Goldman recommendation-in the article-
"Trading at around 20X 2009E free cash flow, Goldman believes Amazon stock can outperform on rising revenue if margins are only flat; RAPID REVENUE GROWTH ASSISTS FREE CASH FLOW BECAUSE AMAZON USES ITS IMPROVING CATEGORY SHARE TO NEGOTIATE LONGER PAYMENT TO SUPPLIERS in categories such as books..."
"FCF" for 2007 according to their definition (computation 1- in the article) came out to $1.181bn, as compared to (computation 2) the FCF beginning with Net Income , of $496ml a difference of $685ml.
Do you feel it is proper or fair to value this $685ml at $13bn, ($685ml x 20 = $13.7bn?) when it all vanished in the following quarter?
Two methods of computing Amazon's FCF for 2007
1) Cash Flow From Operations...........$... bn.
Less Capital Expenditure..............
Free Cash Flow.....................
2) Net Income...................
Plus Depreciation.............
Less Capital Expenditures.............
Free Cash Flow..................... ml
Difference between the formulas ......................... million
FCF, for the 12 months ending march 31, 2008 Cash from Operating Activities 3/31/08........-645ml 12/31/07.... 1,148 9/30/07.........237 6/30/07..........299 Total.................... 1.039bn Less Cap Exp....... -251
FCF-12 Mos/End 3/31/08.........$788ml FCF-12 Mos end 12/31/07........1,181m...
Amazon: Is 'Free Cash Flow' More Important Than Net Income? [View article]
Using AMZN’s method of computing FCF: it appears they had a $393ml reduction in FCF for the 12 mos ended 3/31/08 compared to 12/31/07. It was mostly from the $-366ml difference between March 31, 08 and 07s, Cash from Operating Activities. (2008) $-645ml - $-279= $-366ml). This was because of the large increase in A/Ps of $1.2bn 2007/ 2006, with the Short-Term Cash from December Q sales paid to suppliers in the March Q. (HOW CAN YOU CONSIDER THAT FCF?)
Instead of using fictional companies, why don’t you look at the numbers that Amazon issued in their Statements of Cash Flow. As I said putting billions of $s of valuation on their “FCF” is wrong, meaningless, and I repeat Warren Buffett would not consider the “FCF” from A/P as FCF. The company has little profit and is trying to justify their valuation of $33bn by use of this “FCF”.
FCF, for the 12 months ending March 31, 2008 Cash from Operating Activities
3/31/08........-645ml 12/31/07.....1,148 9/30/07..........237 6/30/07..........299 Total.................... Less Cap Exp.......-251 FCF-12 Mos ended 3/31/08.........$788ml FCF-12 Mos ended12/31/07...... ..1,181ml Decrease in FCF......................
Above is their method of calculation, beginning with CF from operations.
One analyst projected $1.5bn in FCF for the year, I think he should re-evaluate his projection and thinking.
Amazon: Is 'Free Cash Flow' More Important Than Net Income? [View article]
Lot of what you said is true, but point was-
How much market valuation is that FCF worth?
Company makes very little profit, a total of $1.5bn in the past 6 years P/E 67- very high
Market Valuation $33bn
Their Total Debt has been increasing every year,
FCF seems to be a way to pump up or support the stock price
You said Berkshire recognized the valued that float, he used a more meaningful definition to measure it, as was mentioned in the article.
The way some analysts, Amazon, FCF it can be easily manupulated.
For example in the December quarter, if they obtained better terms on $100ml of A/Ps and delayed payment until January their "FCF" (their definition) would have been $100ml higher, $1.281bn rather than $1.181bn. Would that add'l $100ml be meaningful? (except for some investment income)?
Is Amazon's Free Cash Flow Overstated? [View article]
netmargin, you don't understand the meaning or purpose of a FCF analysis. The definition of FCF Warren Buffett uses is the third one listed in the below summary of the article- The definition starts with Net Income. He would not consider the cash held to pay liabilities as FCF, as in your definition-because it's not.
Point is- if you were evaluating a business to buy, how would you consider the Cash in Bank at Dec 31, that would be paid out during the next quarter? Would you pay multiples for it? Or would you be more interested in Net Income? (Which in Amazon's has very little of.
Is that so difficult to understand? check out the statement of Cash Flow and see how that large cash balance decreased over $1billion.
The Cash Flow Statement: Problems with the Current Rules
By Neil S. Weiss and James G.S. Yang
...Concerning the concept of free cash flows, two points should be emphasized: First, increasing reliance is being placed on free cash flow numbers by a variety of users, including investor analysts, credit analysts, and finance and economics theoreticians. Second, as a result of the many users of free cash flow, a variety of definitions have been introduced for the determination of free cash flow.... The weaknesses with the cash flow statement can be divided into five sections:---- 1) differences between commercial and industrial companies versus financial institutions; 2) problems with operating activities; 3) problems with investing activities; 4) problems with financing activities; and 5) the role of free cash flow. The authors offer potential solutions to these problems that could improve the cash flow statement.
The Role of Free Cash Flow- ... The concept of free cash flow was born for this reason. IT IS DEFINED AS CASH WITHOUT ANY RESTRICTIONS ON IT USE. It is available for any purpose at any time. It is similar to the concept of unappropriated retained earnings. Free cash flow has become increasingly important in financial statement analysis, yet the accounting profession has ignored it. ONE CURRENT PROBLEM WITH FREE CASH FLOW IS THAT IT HAS A NUMBER OF DEFINITIONS. As a result, different users may be using different definitions and drawing DIFFERENT CONCLUSIONS ABOUT A COMPANY’S PERFORMANCE....
* Cash provided by operations less capital expenditures * Cash provided by operations less capital expenditures and dividends paid * Net income plus depreciation less capital expenditures * EBITDA less captial expenditures * Earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) multiplied by 1 minus the tax rate, plus depreciation and amortization less changes in operating working capital and less capital spending.....
The differences in definitions are based on key issues concerning what should be considered in determining free cash flow:------
.....Should it be before or after the adjustments for changes in operating assets and liabilities? Using a free cash flow figure based on funds-flow before adjustments for changes in operating assets and liabilities takes a long-run view. In the long run, the changes will vanish. Furthermore, these funds-flow numbers are not DISPORTED BY COMPANY PRACTICES SUCH AS DELAYING PAYMENT OF TRADE CREDITORS TO INFLATE CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATIONS....
Is Amazon's Free Cash Flow Overstated? [View article]
netmargin, it seems you are not considering the quality of what you are calling FCF.
Think about this, for Amazon’s December Quarter- if AMZN received longer payment term on say $300ml of Accounts Payables, of which they paid in December and instead paid this $300ml in January 2008, this would have increased cash at Dec 31, 2007 by $300ml, and also Total Cash Flow From Operating Activities. Using your definition, FCF would have also increase by $300ml- (Net Income would remain the same).
It is correct that CFFOA would be increased by $300ml, but $300ml should not be considered as a part of FCF, it will be used to pay bills so how can it be considered FCF? Including this $300ml in FCF is wrong, it is not FCF. It is true that Amazon earns interest income from the float, but this $300ml is not FCF.
To consider FCF in valuing a business, you should use the FCF definition that Warren Buffett uses, he would laugh at the one the company and many analysts use.
“Structural free cash flow [SFCF] -- what Warren Buffett calls "owner's earnings" -- is net income from operations plus depreciation and amortization minus capital expenditures.”
Is Amazon's Free Cash Flow Overstated? [View article]
believe them? Goldman said Enron was "the best of the best"
GOLDMAN SACHS, October 9, 2001 -
Recommended List Large-Cap Growth Price:US$33.45 Target price: US$48 S&P 500: 1051 United States Enron Corp. (ENE)
Gas & Power Convergence Still the best of the best. With perceptions far below reality, we see major catalysts in third-quarter results and increased disclosure in coming months. We strongly reiterate our Recommended List rating and our conviction in high and sustained growth prospects, even though we have cut 2002 EPS to $2.15 and our price target to $48. We expect Enron shares to recover dramatically in the coming months. We view the current period as an extremely rare opportunity to purchase the shares of a company that remains extremely well positioned to grow at a substantial rate and earn strong returns in the still-very-young and evolving energy convergence space.
We strongly reiterate our Recommended List rating on Enron stock. We spoke recently with top management including the CEO, CFO, chief accounting officer, and the head of wholesale services.
We challenged top management on the wide range of investor concerns that have weighed heavily on the shares and believe that the majority of market speculation is groundless, and that which has some truth to it, to be exaggerated.
Misconceptions abound and perceptions are far below reality, in our view We believe that investors have virtually given up on Enron (down 60% year to date) and its prospects based on the long list of extremely negative stories about the company and its financial condition.
The company's limited transparency on its sources of earnings, its cash flow, and financials in general has hurt investor perceptions as management has declined to be more specific in refuting outrageous claims that have assumed a life of their own.
We believe Enron's fundamentals are still strong despite the weak economy. We view Enron as one of the best companies in the economy, let alone among the companies in our energy convergence space. We are confident in the company's ability to grow earnings more than 20% annually for the next five years, despite its already large base. www.actwin.com/kalostr...
Amazon Toying with Vertical Integration [View article]
RE: AMZN's Free Cash Flow -they have Very Little (posted on a message bd) people have used the wrong formula to compute FCF for AMZN. There are various methods to compute the number depending on the type of enterprise you are dealing with.
If you use the formula from Investopedia Advisor, the link YOU posted earlier in this thread, you would see that there is no increase in FCF www.investopedia.com/t... Formula from your link-
Net income + Depreciation/Amortizat... - Change in Working Capital - Capital Expenditure ----------------------... = Free Cash Flow In some cases FCF can be calculated by taking operating cash flow and subtracting capital expenditures, (not meaningful in AMZN’s case, as it ignores cash on hand @12/31/07 that would be used to pay bills- it is not Free Cash, if accounts payables did not increase by $1.2 bn there would have been only a small increase in Cash Flow. See Balance sheet- finance.yahoo.com/q/bs... HOW CAN YOU ADD THIS INCREASE OF A/P TO FREE CASH FLOW?? IT’S NOT FREE CASH, IT HAS TO PAID OUT IN THE NEXT QUARTER????? “Free cash flow, strictly speaking, is the amount of money left over from the operations of a company that is available for distribution owners of the capital employed in the company (stockholders)”.
FCF computation for AMZN using 12/31/07 from- finance.yahoo.com/q/cf... (ignoring other smaller input items) Net Income................... +Amortization/Deprecia... -Change in Workng Capital........-832 (a/p, a/r etc) –Capital Expenditure.............. ________________ = Free Cash Flow..................... There may be other ways to compute FCF, but the above is more accurate (other minor inputs can be added) as the definition of FCF
Article- Free Cash Flow: Free, But Not Always Easy by Ben McClure, Contributor - Investopedia Advisor
The best things in life are free, and the same holds true for cash flow. Smart investors love companies that produce plenty of free cash flow (FCF). It signals a company's ability to pay debt, pay dividends, buy back stock and facilitate the growth of business - all important undertakings from an investor's perspective. However, while free cash flow is a great gauge of corporate health, it does have its limits and is not immune to accounting trickery....
...To do it another way, grab the income statement and balance sheet. Start with net income and add back charges for depreciation and amortization. Make an additional adjustment for changes in working capital, which is done by subtracting current liabilities from current assets...
Amazon: Dirty Little Secrets Persist [View article]
seekingalpha.com/artic...
Amazon: Is 'Free Cash Flow' More Important Than Net Income? [View article]
Is AMZN’s FCF from Short-term Cash held from Customers' Sales December Q, paid to suppliers in the March 2008 Q WORTH $16bn in Market Valuation??? Remember this FCF, as many classify it, is not Net Income.
Goldman put a 20 X 2009 estimated FCF, to try to justify Amazon's valuation of $34bn. (2009?)
Amazon a company that earned $1.5bn in the past 6 years, a 2007 profit of $476ml and a P/E of 60+) How can "FCF" (aside from earnings) most of which is of POOR QUALITY be given such a outrageous valuation (20X).
From the Goldman recommendation-in the article-
"Trading at around 20X 2009E free cash flow, Goldman believes Amazon stock can outperform on rising revenue if margins are only flat; RAPID REVENUE GROWTH ASSISTS FREE CASH FLOW BECAUSE AMAZON USES ITS IMPROVING CATEGORY SHARE TO NEGOTIATE LONGER PAYMENT TO SUPPLIERS in categories such as books..."
"FCF" for 2007 according to their definition (computation 1- in the article) came out to $1.181bn, as compared to (computation 2) the FCF beginning with Net Income , of $496ml a difference of $685ml.
Do you feel it is proper or fair to value this $685ml at $13bn, ($685ml x 20 = $13.7bn?) when it all vanished in the following quarter?
Two methods of computing Amazon's FCF for 2007
1) Cash Flow From Operations...........$... bn.
Less Capital Expenditure..............
Free Cash Flow.....................
2) Net Income...................
Plus Depreciation.............
Less Capital Expenditures.............
Free Cash Flow..................... ml
Amazon: Is 'Free Cash Flow' More Important Than Net Income? [View article]
Is AMZN’s FCF from Short-term Cash held from Customers' Sales December Q, paid to suppliers in the March 2008 Q WORTH $16bn in Market Valuation??? Remember this FCF, as many classify it, is not Net Income.
Goldman put a 20 X 2009 estimated FCF, to try to justify Amazon's valuation of $34bn. (2009?)
Amazon a company that earned $1.5bn in the past 6 years, a 2007 profit of $476ml and a P/E of 60+) How can "FCF" (aside from earnings) most of which is of POOR QUALITY be given such a outrageous valuation (20X).
From the Goldman recommendation-in the article-
"Trading at around 20X 2009E free cash flow, Goldman believes Amazon stock can outperform on rising revenue if margins are only flat; RAPID REVENUE GROWTH ASSISTS FREE CASH FLOW BECAUSE AMAZON USES ITS IMPROVING CATEGORY SHARE TO NEGOTIATE LONGER PAYMENT TO SUPPLIERS in categories such as books..."
"FCF" for 2007 according to their definition (computation 1- in the article) came out to $1.181bn, as compared to (computation 2) the FCF beginning with Net Income , of $496ml a difference of $685ml.
Do you feel it is proper or fair to value this $685ml at $13bn, ($685ml x 20 = $13.7bn?) when it all vanished in the following quarter?
Two methods of computing Amazon's FCF for 2007
1) Cash Flow From Operations...........$... bn.
Less Capital Expenditure..............
Free Cash Flow.....................
2) Net Income...................
Plus Depreciation.............
Less Capital Expenditures.............
Free Cash Flow..................... ml
Amazon: Is 'Free Cash Flow' More Important Than Net Income? [View article]
Is AMZN’s FCF from Short-term Cash held from Customers' Sales December Q, paid to suppliers in the March 2008 Q worth $16bn in Market Valuation??? Remember this FCF, as many classify it, is not Net Income.
Goldman put a 20 X 2009 estimated FCF, to try to justify Amazon's valuation of $34bn. (2009?)
Amazon a company that earned $1.5bn in the past 6 years, a 2007 profit of $476ml and a P/E of 60+) How can "FCF" (aside from earnings) most of which is of POOR QUALITY be given such a outrageous valuation (20X).
From the Goldman recommendation-in the article-
"Trading at around 20X 2009E free cash flow, Goldman believes Amazon stock can outperform on rising revenue if margins are only flat; RAPID REVENUE GROWTH ASSISTS FREE CASH FLOW BECAUSE AMAZON USES ITS IMPROVING CATEGORY SHARE TO NEGOTIATE LONGER PAYMENT TO SUPPLIERS in categories such as books..."
"FCF" for 2007 according to their definition (computation 1- in the article) came out to $1.181bn, as compared to (computation 2) the FCF beginning with Net Income , of $496ml a difference of $685ml.
Do you feel it is proper or fair to value this $685ml at $13bn, ($685ml x 20 = $13.7bn?) when it all vanished in the following quarter?
Two methods of computing Amazon's FCF for 2007
1) Cash Flow From Operations...........$... bn.
Less Capital Expenditure..............
Free Cash Flow.....................
2) Net Income...................
Plus Depreciation.............
Less Capital Expenditures.............
Free Cash Flow..................... ml
Difference between the formulas ......................... million
Amazon: Is 'Free Cash Flow' More Important Than Net Income? [View article]
Using AMZN’s method of computing FCF it appears they had a $393ml reduction in FCF for
the 12 mos ended 3/31/08 compared to 12/31/07.
finance.google.com/fin...
FCF, for the 12 months ending march 31, 2008
Cash from Operating Activities
3/31/08........-645ml
12/31/07.... 1,148
9/30/07.........237
6/30/07..........299
Total.................... 1.039bn
Less Cap Exp....... -251
FCF-12 Mos/End 3/31/08.........$788ml
FCF-12 Mos end 12/31/07........1,181m...
Decrease in FCF...................... $393ml
Amazon: Is 'Free Cash Flow' More Important Than Net Income? [View article]
Using AMZN’s method of computing FCF: it appears they had a $393ml reduction in FCF for the 12 mos ended 3/31/08 compared to 12/31/07. It was mostly from the $-366ml difference between
March 31, 08 and 07s, Cash from Operating Activities. (2008) $-645ml - $-279= $-366ml). This was because of the large increase in A/Ps of
$1.2bn 2007/ 2006, with the Short-Term Cash from December Q sales paid to
suppliers in the March Q. (HOW CAN YOU CONSIDER THAT FCF?)
Instead of using fictional companies, why don’t you look at the numbers that Amazon issued in their Statements of Cash Flow. As I said putting billions of $s of valuation on their “FCF” is wrong, meaningless, and I repeat Warren Buffett would not consider the “FCF” from A/P as FCF. The company has little profit and is trying to justify their valuation of $33bn by use of this “FCF”.
finance.google.com/fin...
FCF, for the 12 months ending March 31, 2008
Cash from Operating Activities
3/31/08........-645ml
12/31/07.....1,148
9/30/07..........237
6/30/07..........299
Total....................
Less Cap Exp.......-251
FCF-12 Mos ended 3/31/08.........$788ml
FCF-12 Mos ended12/31/07...... ..1,181ml
Decrease in FCF......................
Above is their method of calculation, beginning with CF from operations.
One analyst projected $1.5bn in FCF for the year, I think he should re-evaluate his projection and thinking.
Amazon: Is 'Free Cash Flow' More Important Than Net Income? [View article]
How much market valuation is that FCF worth?
Company makes very little profit, a total of $1.5bn in the past 6 years
P/E 67- very high
Market Valuation $33bn
Their Total Debt has been increasing every year,
FCF seems to be a way to pump up or support the stock price
You said Berkshire recognized the valued that float, he used a more meaningful definition to measure it, as was mentioned in the article.
The way some analysts, Amazon, FCF it can be easily manupulated.
For example in the December quarter, if they obtained better terms on $100ml of A/Ps and delayed payment until January their "FCF" (their definition) would have been $100ml higher, $1.281bn rather than $1.181bn.
Would that add'l $100ml be meaningful? (except for some investment income)?
Is Amazon's Free Cash Flow Overstated? [View article]
Point is- if you were evaluating a business to buy, how would you consider the Cash in Bank at Dec 31, that would be paid out during the next quarter? Would you pay multiples for it? Or would you be more interested in Net Income? (Which in Amazon's has very little of.
Is that so difficult to understand? check out the statement of Cash Flow and see how that large cash balance decreased over $1billion.
finance.yahoo.com/q/cf...
THE CPA JOURNAL
The Cash Flow Statement:
Problems with the Current Rules
By Neil S. Weiss and James G.S. Yang
...Concerning the concept of free cash flows, two points should be emphasized: First, increasing reliance is being placed on free cash flow numbers by a variety of users, including investor analysts, credit analysts, and finance and economics theoreticians. Second, as a result of the many users of free cash flow, a variety of definitions have been introduced for the determination of free cash flow....
The weaknesses with the cash flow statement can be divided into five sections:----
1) differences between commercial and industrial companies versus financial institutions; 2) problems with operating activities; 3) problems with investing activities; 4) problems with financing activities; and 5) the role of free cash flow. The authors offer potential solutions to these problems that could improve the cash flow statement.
The Role of Free Cash Flow-
... The concept of free cash flow was born for this reason. IT IS DEFINED AS CASH WITHOUT ANY RESTRICTIONS ON IT USE. It is available for any purpose at any time. It is similar to the concept of unappropriated retained earnings. Free cash flow has become increasingly important in financial statement analysis, yet the accounting profession has ignored it. ONE CURRENT PROBLEM WITH FREE CASH FLOW IS THAT IT HAS A NUMBER OF DEFINITIONS. As a result, different users may be using different definitions and drawing DIFFERENT CONCLUSIONS ABOUT A COMPANY’S PERFORMANCE....
* Cash provided by operations less capital expenditures
* Cash provided by operations less capital expenditures and dividends paid
* Net income plus depreciation less capital expenditures
* EBITDA less captial expenditures
* Earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) multiplied by 1 minus the tax rate, plus depreciation and amortization less changes in operating working capital and less capital spending.....
The differences in definitions are based on key issues concerning what should be considered in determining free cash flow:------
.....Should it be before or after the adjustments for changes in operating assets and liabilities? Using a free cash flow figure based on funds-flow before adjustments for changes in operating assets and liabilities takes a long-run view. In the long run, the changes will vanish. Furthermore, these funds-flow numbers are not DISPORTED BY COMPANY PRACTICES SUCH AS DELAYING PAYMENT OF TRADE CREDITORS TO INFLATE CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATIONS....
www.nysscpa.org/printv...
Is Amazon's Free Cash Flow Overstated? [View article]
Think about this, for Amazon’s December Quarter- if AMZN received longer payment term on say $300ml of Accounts Payables, of which they paid in December and instead paid this $300ml in January 2008, this would have increased cash at Dec 31, 2007 by $300ml, and also Total Cash Flow From Operating Activities. Using your definition, FCF would have also increase by $300ml- (Net Income would remain the same).
It is correct that CFFOA would be increased by $300ml, but $300ml should not be considered as a part of FCF, it will be used to pay bills so how can it be considered FCF? Including this $300ml in FCF is wrong, it is not FCF. It is true that Amazon earns interest income from the float, but this $300ml is not FCF.
finance.yahoo.com/q/cf...
To consider FCF in valuing a business, you should use the FCF definition that Warren Buffett uses, he would laugh at the one the company and many analysts use.
“Structural free cash flow [SFCF] -- what Warren Buffett calls "owner's earnings" -- is net income from operations plus depreciation and amortization minus capital expenditures.”
You are confusing Cash Flow with Free Cash Flow
Is Amazon's Free Cash Flow Overstated? [View article]
GOLDMAN SACHS, October 9, 2001 -
Recommended List Large-Cap Growth
Price:US$33.45 Target price: US$48 S&P 500: 1051
United States Enron Corp. (ENE)
Gas & Power Convergence
Still the best of the best. With perceptions far below reality, we see major catalysts in third-quarter results and increased
disclosure in coming months. We strongly reiterate our Recommended List rating and our conviction in high and sustained growth prospects, even though we have cut 2002 EPS to $2.15 and our price target to $48. We expect Enron shares to recover dramatically in the coming months. We view the current period as an extremely rare opportunity to purchase the shares of a company that remains extremely well positioned to grow at a substantial rate and earn strong returns in the still-very-young and evolving energy convergence space.
We strongly reiterate our Recommended List rating on Enron stock. We spoke recently with top management including the CEO, CFO, chief accounting officer, and the head of wholesale services.
We challenged top management on the wide range of investor concerns that have weighed heavily on the shares and believe that the majority of market speculation is groundless, and that which has some truth to it, to be exaggerated.
Misconceptions abound and perceptions are far below reality, in our view We believe that investors have virtually given up on Enron (down 60% year to date) and its prospects based on the long list of extremely negative stories about the company and its financial condition.
The company's limited transparency on its sources of earnings, its cash flow, and financials in general has hurt investor perceptions as management has declined to be more specific in refuting outrageous claims that have assumed a life of their own.
We believe Enron's fundamentals are still strong despite the weak economy. We view Enron as one of the best companies in the economy, let alone among the companies in our energy convergence space. We are confident in the company's ability to grow earnings more than 20% annually for the next five years, despite its already large base.
www.actwin.com/kalostr...
Amazon Toying with Vertical Integration [View article]
RE: AMZN's Free Cash Flow -they have Very Little
(posted on a message bd)
people have used the wrong formula to compute FCF for AMZN. There are various methods to compute the number depending on the type of enterprise you are dealing with.
If you use the formula from Investopedia Advisor, the link YOU posted earlier in this thread, you would see that there is no increase in FCF
www.investopedia.com/t...
Formula from your link-
Net income
+ Depreciation/Amortizat...
- Change in Working Capital
- Capital Expenditure
----------------------...
= Free Cash Flow
In some cases FCF can be calculated by taking operating cash flow and subtracting capital expenditures, (not meaningful in AMZN’s case, as it ignores cash on hand @12/31/07 that would be used to pay bills- it is not Free Cash, if accounts payables did not increase by $1.2 bn there would have been only a small increase in Cash Flow.
See Balance sheet- finance.yahoo.com/q/bs...
HOW CAN YOU ADD THIS INCREASE OF A/P TO FREE CASH FLOW?? IT’S NOT FREE CASH, IT HAS TO PAID OUT IN THE NEXT QUARTER?????
“Free cash flow, strictly speaking, is the amount of money left over from the operations of a company that is available for distribution owners of the capital employed in the company (stockholders)”.
FCF computation for AMZN using 12/31/07 from-
finance.yahoo.com/q/cf...
(ignoring other smaller input items)
Net Income...................
+Amortization/Deprecia...
-Change in Workng Capital........-832 (a/p, a/r etc)
–Capital Expenditure..............
________________
= Free Cash Flow.....................
There may be other ways to compute FCF, but the above is more accurate (other minor inputs can be added) as the definition of FCF
Article-
Free Cash Flow: Free, But Not Always Easy
by Ben McClure, Contributor - Investopedia Advisor
The best things in life are free, and the same holds true for cash flow. Smart investors love companies that produce plenty of free cash flow (FCF). It signals a company's ability to pay debt, pay dividends, buy back stock and facilitate the growth of business - all important undertakings from an investor's perspective. However, while free cash flow is a great gauge of corporate health, it does have its limits and is not immune to accounting trickery....
...To do it another way, grab the income statement and balance sheet. Start with net income and add back charges for depreciation and amortization. Make an additional adjustment for changes in working capital, which is done by subtracting current liabilities from current assets...
www.investopedia.com/t...