Seeking Alpha

hoopdreamerz@yahoo.com » Comments » ARNA

  • A Biotech Triple Play: Dendreon, BioCryst and Arena [View article]
    Yes Mike, Peramivir has failed multiple trials over many years. IM, oral and on and on.

    So are you suggesting your price target for Biocryst is now 400M and not 4B?
    May 25 14:52 pm |Rating: +1 -1 |Link to Comment
  • A Biotech Triple Play: Dendreon, BioCryst and Arena [View article]
    Somehow my comment disappeared so maybe i need to be a little softer.

    You made two MAJOR gaffes in your Biocryst analysis.
    One, Tamiflu is ORAL not injected. As a pill it's going to be dramatically cheaper to make, distribute and administer, plus it's actually effective unlike peramivir.

    Two, Biocryst has a market valuation of $140M not $1.4B. This is a 10X difference, so your $4B target is 29X. This is a serious mistake on your part.

    Peramivir has been shown in trial after trial that it doesn't work or barely has any effect at all. Stockpiling an ineffective drug, sure i guess the US government does dumber things. But driving Biocryst stock to a 29-fold gain, i don't think so.
    May 25 09:16 am |Rating: +7 -2 |Link to Comment
  • Orexigen's Contrave: Generic Would Be No Cheaper [View article]
    What would worry me about Lorcaserin is i didn't realize patients weren't allowed to take SSRI drugs if they were in the trial. Considering the millions and millions of people taking them, how can the fda approve without knowing if this combination is safe? Lorcaserin also acts on the cns, i would be very worried about things like seratonin syndrome with people on ssri's. It's just not realistic to think that people will follow the label especially if doctors don't know what the real risks are.

    On the vivus list of exclusions, all of those sounded normal. I wouldn't be surprised if the arna list was similar.
    Apr 11 12:28 pm |Rating: +1 0 |Link to Comment
  • Orexigen's Contrave: Generic Would Be No Cheaper [View article]
    On the surface Vivus is ahead with better data, that's two strikes against Contrave. Further Orexigen didn't meet the FDA standard of a 5% improvement over placebo (4.3%), while Vivus did (7.5%). I would also argue the Vivus combo is better tolerated and safer. I also have serious doubts about whether Orexigen has the competence to adequately complete a filing for approval given a lot of recent turnover at the top of their company most notably their CSO. On safety, 26% of Contrave patients dropped out, 2X the rate of placebo. I believe for an obesity study usually you'd see the opposite. They also had changed the formulation or titration period as I recall to address major problems with nausea. These drugs are all going to be very carefully reviewed by the FDA. So in sum, I'd tilt the scales toward Qnexa and Vivus over Orexigen and see no reason to own Orexigen stock. I own shares in neither mind you.

    Do you disagree with your fellow blog writer Derek Lowe that Arena's candidate won't be approved?
    Apr 07 08:55 am |Rating: +1 -2 |Link to Comment
  • Arena's Obesity Drug Not Likely to Make It [View article]
    Mike Murphy: i didn't know you still had a newsletter. I'll bet you a subscription that Derek is right and it won't get approved.
    Apr 05 23:44 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Orexigen's Contrave: Generic Would Be No Cheaper [View article]
    The question is more whether Orexigen has an approvable concept than generic substitution. I would say it's iffy at this point.
    Apr 05 09:36 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Take Advantage of Market Confusion to Buy Orexigen Therapeutics [View article]
    How will Orexigen go about preidentifying who the strong responders are.
    Mar 18 08:46 am |Rating: 0 -1 |Link to Comment
More on ARNA by hoopdreamerz@yahoo.com
Comments by Ticker
hoopdreamerz@yahoo.com's
Comments Stats
100 comments
Rating: 3 (83 - 80 )