Seeking Alpha

adamcz » Comments |

Sort by:
Latest | Highest rated
  • Marvel: Simply Marvelous, Pretty Expensive [View article]
    Why did you make a post about a marketable security without sharing what it is worth, and how you arrived at that value? There is no thesis here to agree or disagree with. Worthless.
    Jul 31 07:17 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Sears Holdings: A Chart That Will Surprise You [View article]
    You'll have to let me know when Apple's growth subsided. Guess I missed it.
    Dec 04 07:33 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Sears Holdings: A Chart That Will Surprise You [View article]
    You'll have to let me know when Apple's growth subsided. Guess I missed it.
    Dec 04 07:33 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Apple Fails to Deliver, and the Rally Fizzles [View article]
    Apple keeping their price points high is great news for AAPL shareholders. Why would you sell something for $800 that consumers are happy to pay $1100 for?
    Oct 15 07:28 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • S&P 1500 Stocks With The Highest Short Interest [View article]
    104% of floated shares shorted... If the SEC can't enforce delivery of shares, what do we pay them for?
    Sep 11 19:08 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • S&P 1500 Stocks With The Highest Short Interest [View article]
    104% of floated shares shorted... If the SEC can't enforce delivery of shares, what do we pay them for?
    Sep 11 19:08 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Apple Looks Undervalued Based on Past Earnings  [View article]
    Before you can complain about price growth not matching earnings growth, you need to prove that the share price at the beginning of your study was exactly Apple's intrinsic value.

    Obviously if share prices at that point were fifty times what the company is worth, we shouldn't expect them to go anywhere but down, even with 100% earnings growth.
    Apr 11 07:06 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Leaving Google in No Man's Land [View article]
    "You should check out my top 10 holdings and compare them to Google's 3% return today"

    That is quite simply one of the dumbest comebacks I could have imagined. No investor measures their results by the month, let alone the day. I'd be interested in seeing your average compounded return over a 10 year+ period though.
    Apr 10 16:13 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Leaving Google in No Man's Land [View article]
    What was the point of this rambling "article"? It has no thesis, and doesn't attempt to provide a valuation for Google. This moron would like Google more at $500 than he does at $450? Does this website screen its contributers or what?
    Apr 04 10:06 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
Comments by Ticker
adamcz's
Comments Stats
9 comments
Rating: 0 (0 - 0 )