Seeking Alpha

Financial Planner » Comments |

Sort by:
Latest | Highest rated
  • Let Warren Buffett Handle Your Portfolio [View article]
    Just a note on something you said: "For Buffett's style of value investing to be successful, the efficient market theory must not be valid"

    ***

    This is a common fallacy I see a lot. Usually, I see either:

    1) the market is efficient, and by efficient they mean that all information is reflected in the stock price at any given time

    or

    2) the market is inefficient and by inefficient they mean that it is "irrational".

    But I think these are false alternatives. The market is efficient *because* of the traders making rational evaluations about the value of companies. They are seeking to maximize profits - they don't always get it right, but their motives are rational, they want to make money.

    The reason they're able to make money is that not all of the info is reflected in stocks (and an obvious conflict which demonstrates this is the illegality of insider trading), but even if insider trading were legal, it takes time for information to reach the market. Nothing happens instantaneously. When price discrepancies are found, or new information implies that a stock ought to be more valuable than what it is (based on the values of the participants trading in the market), then that represents a profit opportunity.

    It's incredible if you think about it. Those stock pickers - despite their humility - are pretty smart.
    Jan 13 15:50 pm |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Explaining the Mortgage Meltdown [View article]
    You said: The problem here begins with the lenders' internal risk management and oversight/underwriting... combined with thee various loan programs offered.

    ***
    The problem with this is that this is NOT where it actually began. You hinted at it but completely overlooked it. Another reader mentioned Congress, which is half correct. However, none of these loans could be made under a free market banking system with such impunity.

    The Federal Reserve dictates the short-term interest rates and also sets the standard for lending practices of member banks. Since banks are "insured" against loss, there is a loosening of lending guidelines - hence the fractional reserve system.

    It's easy to blame the member banks because they have no alternative. If you're a bank, you come under certain rules and regulations. Of course, smaller banks don't take the risks of larger banks. For example, local credit unions or banks that do business only in a handful of counties in one particular State won't take on the same types of risky loans that a larger bank like Countrywide will.

    Sometimes I think that some of the big shots in the banking and financial business believe that they are "too big to fail"...and maybe they are. With more regulation comes more alleged protection - for depositors AND the institution itself; protection from responsibility.

    Get rid of the gyrating, arbitrary interest rates set by the Fed, and most of your reckless lending policies will be solved. Reckless banks will go out of business, but they'll still be rated appropriately by independent rating agencies.

    It sounds harsh, but we are living the alternative. Does anybody really enjoy this?
    Apr 08 11:32 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • "Reluctant Banks" Let Defaulted Borrowers Stay in Homes [View article]
    The mortgage brokers aren't to blame...well not completely. I'm sure there were more than a few dishonest brokers in the bunch, but the Federal Reserve encourages such behavior by discouraging savings through fractional reserve banking and inflating or manipulating the money supply.
    Apr 05 11:57 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Is the SEC Really to Blame for Bear Stearns? [View article]
    Check your premises. You are assuming that the SEC is necessary to regulate leverage in the financial industry. However, it is the Federal Reserve System that forces the issue through the policy of fractional reserve banking and in turn influences other financial firms to follow suit regardless of whether they are in the banking business or not.

    The SEC merely controls the flow of information, or is supposed to. The leverage is not bad, it is the idea that they can leverage as much as they want with no consequences. There is a Government body that stands ready to bail not only them out, but investors as well, be it the SIPC or FDIC.
    Apr 05 11:37 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
Comments by Ticker
Financial Planner's
Comments Stats
4 comments
Rating: 0 (0 - 0 )