> How convenient that the SEC decides to come out with this right before > most banks are due to report. > > And why other companies like WB, or NCC on that list? > Should I assume that a company like Morgan Stanley or Goldman are > more vulnerable to naked short selling than a WB, or WM? > Please...
How convenient that the SEC decides to come out with this right before most banks are due to report.
And why other companies like WB, or NCC on that list? Should I assume that a company like Morgan Stanley or Goldman are more vulnerable to naked short selling than a WB, or WM? Please...
Why I'm Committed to the UltraShort Financials ETF [View article]
WFC has big exposure in the California real estate mkt. Only time will tell how much write offs they will take. As I already see people stating that today's was a page turner, I'm sorry but when Citi still has about $1.1 trillion in assets off their balance sheet without knowing what kind of losses will be taken going forward, most banks are not a buy. Their business model is broken.
Sort by:
Latest | Highest ratedMother of All Short Squeezes? [View article]
On Jul 20 10:14 PM sharp10 wrote:
> How convenient that the SEC decides to come out with this right before
> most banks are due to report.
>
> And why other companies like WB, or NCC on that list?
> Should I assume that a company like Morgan Stanley or Goldman are
> more vulnerable to naked short selling than a WB, or WM?
> Please...
Mother of All Short Squeezes? [View article]
And why other companies like WB, or NCC on that list?
Should I assume that a company like Morgan Stanley or Goldman are more vulnerable to naked short selling than a WB, or WM?
Please...
Why I'm Committed to the UltraShort Financials ETF [View article]