Seeking Alpha

BAC PL » Comments » MA

  • Credit Card Companies Gone Wild and Other Economic Happenings [View article]
    That you're surprised by the increase in credit card rates (it's happening across the board) is fairly strong evidence that you've not made the connection between these actions and the credit card legislation that's the prime mover.

    Our Congress and President have decided that they know better than the free market, and have passed laws that eliminate differential pricing for riskier consumers. Essentially, the good credit risks will now have to fund the deadbeats. If that sounds like an idiotic move -- look at how the government's meddling in pushing mortgages to people who should never have gotten them worked out -- then you can understand how frustrating it is to people in the card industry, who are simply adapting to the new reality. Since when has the government interference made *anything* more efficient? How about never? Oh, and forcing low risk, healthy young people to buy more health insurance than they need is from the same bag of tricks.

    The hits just keep on coming.

    p.s. Regarding your response to the first commenter, look at Steve Case's Revolution Card.
    Oct 22 07:51 am |Rating: +5 -2 |Link to Comment
  • AmEx's Pain Likely Discover's Gain [View article]
    Frank -- We get that you love DFS. When did you get in (hopefully not last year!), and what's your prediction for 6 and 12 months for DFS?
    Aug 13 07:11 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • How Much Credit Is Too Much? Where AmEx Went Wrong [View article]
    @ mdmrjsds:

    Good points. The only thing I'd add is that, beyond the need to grow the business by expanding the target, there's another strong rationale: merchant acceptance. Expanding Amex's footprint gives the company a stronger argument (network effect) when it is negotiating with retailers to take the card.
    Aug 01 10:05 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • How Much Credit Is Too Much? Where AmEx Went Wrong [View article]
    @ mojo:

    1. The fact that Citi is a large card issuer is a far cry from saying that cards are its core business. Listen to one conference call, and you'll know what I mean. The amount of time that management, and the analysts, spend discussing cards is dwarfed by the focus on the banking operation. Back to my point: The author would do better to compare pure-plays (MBNA (pre BAC), Cap One, Advanta, DFS even), than Citi. Whether or not C is a large US player (forget about the rest of the world), the type of comparison he's making calls for like to like. What % of C employees do you think are actively focused on the card business? 5% maybe?

    2. You're mistaken again. This is simple logic, man. Look at the charts and think: If you have a young, low income, thin credit file type of card applicant, do you grant him/her a large line? Of course not. And what if you have a high FICO, 6 figure applicant -- doesn't he/she merit a higher line? Sure thing! That, very generally speaking, is why Discover has lower lines. Seriously, Discover could (and should!) be very tight with lines if it's granting credit to low income/thin credit file consumers. In a sense, I'm almost agreeing with you and the author, actually. For any given cardmember, the limit should be "right," however you define that to be. But best underwriter? What does that even mean? If you give miniscule lines, no one defaults, or the default loss is minimized. But being "hardest to get" does not make DFS the best underwriter.

    By the way, you make me laugh. It seems like you're implying that's there's something desirable about the hard-to-get Discover card. So ... the ultra-rich are tossing their Amex Black cards for Discover cash back? LOL. Even among us normal folk, who wants to pull out a Discover card at a nice restaurant? Might as well pay with food stamps.
    Aug 01 10:00 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • How Much Credit Is Too Much? Where AmEx Went Wrong [View article]
    SeekingAlpha sucks again. How do these things get on Yahoo Finance?

    1. Without checking your numbers, I'll grant that the MBNA > McDonald's comment is okay, as MBNA was a pure-play issuer. But comparing Citi to Wal-Mart and Microsoft is dumb. Citi's card issuing business is a tiny part of its whole operation.

    2. It's Jamie Dimon, not Dimond. What's next? Warren Buffet?

    3. You're missing some important decimal points in your charge-off table.

    4. Your big point, that AXP has handed out larger credit limits to its card holders is conjecture not based on fact. It's possible, given the scenario, but you've provided no proof.

    5. Discover's credit limits are low because they are targeting the low FICO, high risk sorts of people.

    6. How can anyone trust advice from someone who is long DFS? LOL
    Aug 01 07:55 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
  • Is Visa Really Priceless? [View article]
    So the main point the author is trying to make is that having a lot of shares outstanding is a negative, right? By this logic, a stock split would be an incredible sell signal? And if Visa did a reverse stock split to get to the exact same number of shares as MA, which would raise the per share price through the roof, that would somehow change the value of Visa? This argument does not hold water; the market cap is the market cap. What a half-baked load of crap.
    Apr 09 08:24 am |Rating: 0 0 |Link to Comment
More on MA by BAC PL
Comments by Ticker
BAC PL's
Comments Stats
14 comments
Rating: 30 (39 - 9 )