When I started life on an FX trading desk the first thing I was told was that the quickest way to the exit was to add to a losing trade. On the other hand, I don't doubt that some people would say that if you liked CAT at 42 you should love it at 31-32.
Personally - and trading is a very personal thing - in your position I would do two things:
1. With the money you've already got in CAT: bearing in mind any transaction costs, I'd ask myself what else I could now be doing with that money and why I think that would be a better bet than leaving it where it is. (The fact you bought CAT at 42 is now irrelevant. The fact that you believe it might go back to 42 may not be - it all depends on what else might do better from here.)
2. With any new money: the analysis is actually the same, but with half the transaction costs missing. CAT is just one alternative - you have to evaluate them all and set expectations for each within your own risk-reward parameters.
On Feb 05 12:17 PM User 351620 wrote:
> I bought caterpillar at $42. I don't intend to sell. should I buy > more at $31-$32?
Reading the comments above - all of which are interesting - is it really any wonder that it's so tough to figure out what anything's worth in today's shell-game economy? And if we can generate so many grey hairs trying to figure out a 'straightforward industrial' like CAT, what hope is there for putting a meaningful value on a bank in today's climate - Paulson Plan or no Paulson Plan? And if bankers can't ascribe meaningful values to each others' assets and earnings, why should the Plan make that much difference to interbank lending?
I suggest that anybody who reckons the Plan is a silver bullet should look at a bank balance sheet, notionally sell the RMBSs to the US taxpayer for whatever, then ask himself/herself how much of what's left (including the off-BS stuff) can be properly valued. I've done this with a couple of large European financials, and it ain't pretty - but doubtless I'm missing something.
Bullish or Bearish, And Why? [View article]
Personally - and trading is a very personal thing - in your position I would do two things:
1. With the money you've already got in CAT: bearing in mind any transaction costs, I'd ask myself what else I could now be doing with that money and why I think that would be a better bet than leaving it where it is. (The fact you bought CAT at 42 is now irrelevant. The fact that you believe it might go back to 42 may not be - it all depends on what else might do better from here.)
2. With any new money: the analysis is actually the same, but with half the transaction costs missing. CAT is just one alternative - you have to evaluate them all and set expectations for each within your own risk-reward parameters.
On Feb 05 12:17 PM User 351620 wrote:
> I bought caterpillar at $42. I don't intend to sell. should I buy
> more at $31-$32?
Caterpillar's Troubling Bond Issue [View article]
I suggest that anybody who reckons the Plan is a silver bullet should look at a bank balance sheet, notionally sell the RMBSs to the US taxpayer for whatever, then ask himself/herself how much of what's left (including the off-BS stuff) can be properly valued. I've done this with a couple of large European financials, and it ain't pretty - but doubtless I'm missing something.