<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>1509alpha's Comments</title>
    <description>1509alpha's Comments RSS Syndication from SeekingAlpha.com</description>
    <link>http://seekingalpha.com/user/1778311/comments</link>
    <item>
      <title>More on Apple: iPhone and Mac sales below expectations, iPads roughly in-line. FQ1 gross margin was 38.6%, down 510 bps Y/Y but above guidance of 36% and responsible for EPS beat. FQ2 gross margin guidance of 37.5%-38.5%. Exc. retail, Americas sales +15% Y/Y (was +43% in FQ4), Europe +11% (+8% prior), Japan +25% (+113% prior), Greater China +67%, rest of Asia-Pac +10%. Retail +5%. Cash/investment balance at $137B. AAPL -4.8% AH. CC at 5PM ET (webcast). (PR)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/777531?source=feed#comment-14065331</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14065331</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Alright, $350 minus cash of $145 = $205. P.E. of 4.<br/><br/>Do you value all companies like this? Not much I can say your negative outlook is in charge for the time being. I just remain amazed.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 17:24:43 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Alright, $350 minus cash of $145 = $205. P.E. of 4.<br/><br/>Do you value all companies like this? Not much I can say your negative outlook is in charge for the time being. I just remain amazed.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple: Before Earnings, The Facts On China</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1128511/comments?source=feed#comment-14064951</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14064951</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Profits continue to rise while the stock drops. Apple beat their earnings projection by over $2/share and even the street.<br/><br/>Cash on hand $137 billion.<br/><br/>I wonder how high all sales, phone, mini and mac, would be if manufacturing could keep up?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 17:17:36 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Profits continue to rise while the stock drops. Apple beat their earnings projection by over $2/share and even the street.<br/><br/>Cash on hand $137 billion.<br/><br/>I wonder how high all sales, phone, mini and mac, would be if manufacturing could keep up?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple (AAPL): FQ1 EPS of $13.81 beats by $0.37. Revenue of $54.51B (+18% Y/Y) misses by $220M. 47.8M iPhones, 22.9M iPads, 4.1M Macs, 12.7M iPods. Expects FQ2 revenue of $41B-$43B, below $45.6B consensus. Shares -4.3% AH. (PR)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/777441?source=feed#comment-14064521</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14064521</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The cash now is up to $150/share. From $485 net $335/ share.<br/><br/>Earnings for this fiscal year projected $51/share. P.E. down to about 6.5  Amazing!]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 17:08:26 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The cash now is up to $150/share. From $485 net $335/ share.<br/><br/>Earnings for this fiscal year projected $51/share. P.E. down to about 6.5  Amazing!]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Investors are worried about iPhone demand, iPad mix, Mac sales and most importantly margins," says BTIG's Walter Piecyk, discussing concerns going into Apple's (AAPL +1.4%) FQ1 report today. Piecyk took a lot of heat for downgrading Apple to Neutral last April, but shares are down 20% since then. He thinks an "old-school" revenue beat is needed to calm investors, but with shares now below 8x FY13 EPS exc. cash and earnings expected to show the first Y/Y drop since '03, expectations have come down. Revenue is expected to grow 18% Y/Y to $54.7B.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/776191?source=feed#comment-14046771</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14046771</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Funny, no one contacted me from BTIG about my thoughts as an AAPL investor. My only concern is to have bottom line profits continue to rise year after year. Anyway that happens from margin changes or sales increases or new product development all come back to bottom line profit, keep that moving in a positive direction.<br/><br/>I wonder if AMZN investors have this margin worry Walter highlights?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 10:54:57 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Funny, no one contacted me from BTIG about my thoughts as an AAPL investor. My only concern is to have bottom line profits continue to rise year after year. Anyway that happens from margin changes or sales increases or new product development all come back to bottom line profit, keep that moving in a positive direction.<br/><br/>I wonder if AMZN investors have this margin worry Walter highlights?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple's Margins Are The Key To This Quarter And Beyond</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1126911/comments?source=feed#comment-14044791</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14044791</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Baker, completely agree. Selling a stock off because of margins or &quot;whispers&quot; should happen to companies that have only good priced in. In the case of AAPL the market has it priced for a death spiral so even mild misses should are ready be accounted for. Any good news should be a positive shock to the doom and gloom crowd.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 10:08:15 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Baker, completely agree. Selling a stock off because of margins or &quot;whispers&quot; should happen to companies that have only good priced in. In the case of AAPL the market has it priced for a death spiral so even mild misses should are ready be accounted for. Any good news should be a positive shock to the doom and gloom crowd.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Verizon (VZ) states on its Q4 call it activated 6.2M iPhones in Q4, good for 63% of total smartphone activations (up from 46% in Q3, and 56% in the year-ago period). Big Red had previously disclosed it activated 9.8M smartphones in the quarter. CFO Fran Shammo says about half of the iPhone sales involved the iPhone 5 - that remark comes as UBS points to survey data indicating a mix shift towards older and lower-capacity iPhone models. Apple (AAPL) +0.8%. (AT&amp;amp;T smartphone sales)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/772911?source=feed#comment-14001991</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14001991</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Thanks Humble, that is so good only AAPL can get that kind of news and not go up from it.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 10:18:14 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Thanks Humble, that is so good only AAPL can get that kind of news and not go up from it.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Verizon (VZ) states on its Q4 call it activated 6.2M iPhones in Q4, good for 63% of total smartphone activations (up from 46% in Q3, and 56% in the year-ago period). Big Red had previously disclosed it activated 9.8M smartphones in the quarter. CFO Fran Shammo says about half of the iPhone sales involved the iPhone 5 - that remark comes as UBS points to survey data indicating a mix shift towards older and lower-capacity iPhone models. Apple (AAPL) +0.8%. (AT&amp;amp;T smartphone sales)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/772911?source=feed#comment-14001121</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">14001121</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I see the % increase from 56 to 63 but could someone tell me the # of units y over y. Thanks.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 10:01:11 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I see the % increase from 56 to 63 but could someone tell me the # of units y over y. Thanks.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple: Behaviorally, Fundamentally Attractive</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1124081/comments?source=feed#comment-13998451</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13998451</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[How many times in one article do you have to tell us Steve is gone? Everyone dies, people are missed but new great people step up. <br/><br/>Abe Lincoln in the 1860-1865 period was the most important person in the U.S.A. Gone and we are still here. Walt Disney, talk about a visionary, the company is better than ever.<br/><br/>Large organizations will always have change, don't sell everyone else short.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 09:06:46 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[How many times in one article do you have to tell us Steve is gone? Everyone dies, people are missed but new great people step up. <br/><br/>Abe Lincoln in the 1860-1865 period was the most important person in the U.S.A. Gone and we are still here. Walt Disney, talk about a visionary, the company is better than ever.<br/><br/>Large organizations will always have change, don't sell everyone else short.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>My 1st Quarter 2013 Apple Double Income Stream Strategy</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1122681/comments?source=feed#comment-13967611</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13967611</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[broncubnug, I agree with you because of the media more than the investing public. The media would have one less bullet to fire at AAPL with a stock split. <br/><br/>The media is so very popular, they promote or scare the public in many areas from finance to electing a President. Big brother is not the government as much as it is the media.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 11:29:01 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[broncubnug, I agree with you because of the media more than the investing public. The media would have one less bullet to fire at AAPL with a stock split. <br/><br/>The media is so very popular, they promote or scare the public in many areas from finance to electing a President. Big brother is not the government as much as it is the media.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>My 1st Quarter 2013 Apple Double Income Stream Strategy</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1122681/comments?source=feed#comment-13967141</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13967141</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The author basically is betting that AAPL will not go higher than 518. after earnings. He is receiving $17.95 through Friday next, someone else is taking the other side thinking AAPL will trade north of $520. For example if the stock trades to $550. by the contract date, the &quot;buyer&quot; will have made more than 150% on their investment in a week.<br/><br/>The author is taking $17.95 for maximum profit, capping it, and for this receiving down side protection from loss to $482.05. The author is the seller of the contract.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 11:19:11 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The author basically is betting that AAPL will not go higher than 518. after earnings. He is receiving $17.95 through Friday next, someone else is taking the other side thinking AAPL will trade north of $520. For example if the stock trades to $550. by the contract date, the &quot;buyer&quot; will have made more than 150% on their investment in a week.<br/><br/>The author is taking $17.95 for maximum profit, capping it, and for this receiving down side protection from loss to $482.05. The author is the seller of the contract.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>My 1st Quarter 2013 Apple Double Income Stream Strategy</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1122681/comments?source=feed#comment-13966761</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13966761</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Once again, you are looking at the past sales. WS prices looking forward much more than backward. You didn't respond to your error of % down, Why?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 11:08:14 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Once again, you are looking at the past sales. WS prices looking forward much more than backward. You didn't respond to your error of % down, Why?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple Earnings: What To Look For Beyond The Numbers</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1122821/comments?source=feed#comment-13966521</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13966521</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The street is not at 14.20 and 56MM in sales. This is another way to show Apple did not meet expectations. Very weak.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 11:03:51 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The street is not at 14.20 and 56MM in sales. This is another way to show Apple did not meet expectations. Very weak.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>My 1st Quarter 2013 Apple Double Income Stream Strategy</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1122681/comments?source=feed#comment-13962551</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13962551</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Numerous problems with the article. <br/><br/>First, the % drop in Stock price was 29% not 39%. It would take a 39% increase from these levels to get back to $702. closing price at the high mark. <br/><br/>Second, the P.E. numbers are backward looking. AAPL is projected to earn about $50 for the current fiscal year, without benefit of cash on hand that naturally is a P. E. of 10 current year. If you give AAPL credit for the almost $150/share of cash on the balance sheet the current P.E. is now about 7.5 for the current fiscal.<br/><br/>I would like to see much of this cash used in a share friendly manner because AAPL gets almost no credit for it. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2013 09:13:18 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Numerous problems with the article. <br/><br/>First, the % drop in Stock price was 29% not 39%. It would take a 39% increase from these levels to get back to $702. closing price at the high mark. <br/><br/>Second, the P.E. numbers are backward looking. AAPL is projected to earn about $50 for the current fiscal year, without benefit of cash on hand that naturally is a P. E. of 10 current year. If you give AAPL credit for the almost $150/share of cash on the balance sheet the current P.E. is now about 7.5 for the current fiscal.<br/><br/>I would like to see much of this cash used in a share friendly manner because AAPL gets almost no credit for it. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Sharp (SHCAY.PK bucks a strong market in Japan this morning and trades -3.9% after reports in the U.S. overnight said Apple (AAPL) was cutting its orders for panels from SHCAY.PK and other suppliers due to weaker-than-expected sales for the iPhone 5.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/761191?source=feed#comment-13710161</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13710161</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Every Apple store or other retailer like Wal-mart that I have inquired about the phone still has limited supplies. Why aren't these stores with a full inventory of every model if sales are so weak?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 20:35:25 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Every Apple store or other retailer like Wal-mart that I have inquired about the phone still has limited supplies. Why aren't these stores with a full inventory of every model if sales are so weak?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>77% of growth funds studied in Bernstein's Dec. analysis of 800 mutual funds owned shares of Apple (AAPL -3.6%), down from 82% in a Dec. 2011 review. Moreover, their average position relative to Apple's Russell 1000 weight had fallen markedly. However, Apple's penetration of value funds rose to 40% from 29% over this time, though its average weight remains only 0.4x that of its S&amp;amp;P 500 weight. Bernstein's conclusion: Apple needs to reel in more value investors by hiking its dividend - the current yield is 2.1%. (order cut reports: I, II) (previous)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/761151?source=feed#comment-13710041</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13710041</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[&quot; No one left to buy&quot;. Why isn't this an issue with every other company?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 20:31:13 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[&quot; No one left to buy&quot;. Why isn't this an issue with every other company?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple Ready To Bounce Back On New Growth Driver</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1110881/comments?source=feed#comment-13701981</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13701981</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Her unreasonable attacks on AAPL stopped me from watching Fast Money. I have not seen it in over a month, too bad when it first aired years ago I really enjoyed it.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:55:10 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Her unreasonable attacks on AAPL stopped me from watching Fast Money. I have not seen it in over a month, too bad when it first aired years ago I really enjoyed it.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is A Cheaper iPhone Really In The Works?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1108021/comments?source=feed#comment-13606091</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13606091</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[It's nice to read the comments of a professional that doesn't write with one wet finger in the air. I'm all for changing ones outlook when fundamentals change, but have some conviction or don't say it. I'm going to check out your website.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:38:05 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[It's nice to read the comments of a professional that doesn't write with one wet finger in the air. I'm all for changing ones outlook when fundamentals change, but have some conviction or don't say it. I'm going to check out your website.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is Apple (AAPL -0.5%) finally close to scoring an iPhone deal with NTT DoCoMo (DCM)? The president of the top Japanese carrier, which has been bleeding share to iPhone-carrying SoftBank (SFTBF.PK) and KDDI, says his company is willing to sell the iPhone if it can reach a mutually beneficial deal. DoCoMo and Apple have reportedly been at odds in the past over Apple's purchase requirements and DoCoMo's insistence on pre-installing some of its apps. (China Mobile)</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/757871?source=feed#comment-13596111</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13596111</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Why would you think that? If Apple can sell 7 million per quarter through that carrier it will smash the forward forecast.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 13:20:10 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Why would you think that? If Apple can sell 7 million per quarter through that carrier it will smash the forward forecast.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Friday's Fantastic Finish: Russell All-Time High, S&amp;P Catching Up</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1107221/comments?source=feed#comment-13589631</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13589631</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[This article aside, 9 of10 articles are more than bearish on AAPL with companies off to the races that make little profit compared to their valuations.<br/><br/>This is reminding me of how BERK A, was being talked down and the market drove it down while the Nas. went to the moon saying eye balls where more important than profits.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 11:12:40 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[This article aside, 9 of10 articles are more than bearish on AAPL with companies off to the races that make little profit compared to their valuations.<br/><br/>This is reminding me of how BERK A, was being talked down and the market drove it down while the Nas. went to the moon saying eye balls where more important than profits.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple Cash And Investments Are Disclosed And Supports The Stock</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1105991/comments?source=feed#comment-13568771</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13568771</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I agree with your thoughts on the matter but only with the domestic money. I don't believe they can use the over seas funds, if possible, I too would like to see it.<br/>I would like to see them issue corporate paper to their foreign suppliers allowing for more favorable pricing on finished goods. Apple could help with modernizing plants or using the funds to purchase raw materials. I'll bet Apple could get 8-10% and influence their manufacturers even more than they already do.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 21:20:10 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I agree with your thoughts on the matter but only with the domestic money. I don't believe they can use the over seas funds, if possible, I too would like to see it.<br/>I would like to see them issue corporate paper to their foreign suppliers allowing for more favorable pricing on finished goods. Apple could help with modernizing plants or using the funds to purchase raw materials. I'll bet Apple could get 8-10% and influence their manufacturers even more than they already do.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Despite the popularity of cheap smartphones, this will never be the future of Apple&amp;rsquo;s (AAPL -0.1%) products," says SVP Phil Schiller in an interview with a Chinese paper. He adds that in "every product that Apple creates, we consider using only the best technology available." The remarks throw cold water on reports of a cheaper iPhone featuring less costly materials, and particularly on a Bloomberg report that Apple is considering retail prices of just $99-$149 for the device. Update: The interview's text has been significantly revised.</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/currents/post/755991?source=feed#comment-13553381</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13553381</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Ready W.S., not you can sell AAPL because it will not have the cheap  phone because yesterday you sold it because will.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:38:33 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Ready W.S., not you can sell AAPL because it will not have the cheap  phone because yesterday you sold it because will.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple's Cheaper iPhone: Don't Panic!</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1104541/comments?source=feed#comment-13530121</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13530121</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Good post Ted, as a semi retired business owner of a small chain of retail businesses I always first looked at the impact on the bottom line. The focus on gross margin is anal, now margin is also important but that is related to volume with G.P. A larger bottom line can be attained in numerous ways and many work and sometimes change is good.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 08:26:55 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Good post Ted, as a semi retired business owner of a small chain of retail businesses I always first looked at the impact on the bottom line. The focus on gross margin is anal, now margin is also important but that is related to volume with G.P. A larger bottom line can be attained in numerous ways and many work and sometimes change is good.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mobile Manufacturers Part III: Apple Makes More Money</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1103591/comments?source=feed#comment-13512811</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13512811</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[The path to profits for most of these companies starts with healthy margins not only market share.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 18:18:20 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[The path to profits for most of these companies starts with healthy margins not only market share.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hurdles For Apple Longs</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1103231/comments?source=feed#comment-13501821</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13501821</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[So the forward P.E. of 7.5 minus cash is too high and needs to &quot;unwind'. What should the rest of the market &quot;unwind&quot; to?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 15:00:51 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[So the forward P.E. of 7.5 minus cash is too high and needs to &quot;unwind'. What should the rest of the market &quot;unwind&quot; to?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Cheaper iPhone Would Confirm A Lack Of Innovation And Declining Margins At Apple</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1102591/comments?source=feed#comment-13494411</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13494411</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Great post! Here is something for the negatives to write about and I'm shocked they haven't picked up on it already. Apple makes great products that last, I know I've owned computers starting in 1986 with the Apple 2. The point is that I use their computers and other products much longer per unit that my friends who are still with H.P. or Dell. The new attack can be that Apple will fail because the products are too good to need quick replacement.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 12:32:45 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Great post! Here is something for the negatives to write about and I'm shocked they haven't picked up on it already. Apple makes great products that last, I know I've owned computers starting in 1986 with the Apple 2. The point is that I use their computers and other products much longer per unit that my friends who are still with H.P. or Dell. The new attack can be that Apple will fail because the products are too good to need quick replacement.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Cheaper iPhone Would Confirm A Lack Of Innovation And Declining Margins At Apple</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1102591/comments?source=feed#comment-13492441</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13492441</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[Great post, business 101. How have AMZN margins been lately?]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 12:00:57 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[Great post, business 101. How have AMZN margins been lately?]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Cheaper iPhone Would Confirm A Lack Of Innovation And Declining Margins At Apple</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1102591/comments?source=feed#comment-13492131</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13492131</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[goofydon, I agree with your statement on the Mini AAPL has not been the plus for the share price. I ask how can they sell the product at the upper end of the &quot;guessed&quot; price points and completely sell out and this not be viewed as great for AAPL. This is ignored while the nuts focus on something they can spin as negative. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 11:54:58 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[goofydon, I agree with your statement on the Mini AAPL has not been the plus for the share price. I ask how can they sell the product at the upper end of the &quot;guessed&quot; price points and completely sell out and this not be viewed as great for AAPL. This is ignored while the nuts focus on something they can spin as negative. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A Cheaper iPhone Would Confirm A Lack Of Innovation And Declining Margins At Apple</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1102591/comments?source=feed#comment-13491241</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13491241</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[We are in a zone that no matter what Apple hints at it will be viewed poorly. All we heard about is the need for a less expensive phone for the lower income Chinese and India, ect. So now the nuts have a new attack area. If Apple had come out with a statement against a low cost phone, the stock would sell off for not adding it to their product lineup. It will be interesting to see when the attacks stop.]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 11:42:22 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[We are in a zone that no matter what Apple hints at it will be viewed poorly. All we heard about is the need for a less expensive phone for the lower income Chinese and India, ect. So now the nuts have a new attack area. If Apple had come out with a statement against a low cost phone, the stock would sell off for not adding it to their product lineup. It will be interesting to see when the attacks stop.]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Accurate Year-Over-Year Comparisons Critical To Understanding Apple's Q1 FY13 Earnings Release</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1102351/comments?source=feed#comment-13488381</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13488381</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[I agree with your take on CNBC, they have become unusually negative on AAPL. I don't remember them with any company ever like this. Melissa Lee and Fast Money have lost me as a viewer. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 10:47:40 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[I agree with your take on CNBC, they have become unusually negative on AAPL. I don't remember them with any company ever like this. Melissa Lee and Fast Money have lost me as a viewer. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>An Apple Repeat Of Last Quarter?</title>
      <link>http://seekingalpha.com/article/1098001/comments?source=feed#comment-13408901</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">13408901</guid>
      <content>
        <![CDATA[This is as strange as it gets. AAPL is sold because at $329, the Mini will fail, what happens, it sells out everywhere in the world. Apple has a run away hit so then sell it because of margin pressure, this is from the same people who said it must market between $199 -$249. How can both be sold?<br/><br/>Why is it that every nut with a way to spill forth a negative opinion is taken as the truth that moves the share price lower?<br/><br/>How does a company that has the top retail stores in the world not receive credit that they can market directly to the consumer and win them with touch and feel? <br/><br/>Why is it that Apple must lower price points but Nike or BMW does not? How can AMZN and AAPL be valued like this? AMZN made a profit of .08 cents per share TTM while AAPL made $44.15 per share. ]]>
      </content>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 15:46:50 -0500</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[This is as strange as it gets. AAPL is sold because at $329, the Mini will fail, what happens, it sells out everywhere in the world. Apple has a run away hit so then sell it because of margin pressure, this is from the same people who said it must market between $199 -$249. How can both be sold?<br/><br/>Why is it that every nut with a way to spill forth a negative opinion is taken as the truth that moves the share price lower?<br/><br/>How does a company that has the top retail stores in the world not receive credit that they can market directly to the consumer and win them with touch and feel? <br/><br/>Why is it that Apple must lower price points but Nike or BMW does not? How can AMZN and AAPL be valued like this? AMZN made a profit of .08 cents per share TTM while AAPL made $44.15 per share. ]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
